Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2016

6 results

Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes in France.

Roussel R, Martinez L, Vandebrouck T, Douik H, Emiel P, Guery M, Hunt B, Valentine WJ

Journal of medical economics5 Nov 2015Cited by 16 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study6

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone6

In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  1. 01Computer modelNot a test of Liraglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a simulation of adults with type 2 diabetes in France, liraglutide was projected to add 0.25 QALYs of quality-adjusted life expectancy compared with sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model for France, liraglutide was projected to give slightly more healthy life years than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected quality-adjusted life expectancy versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Healthcare costs and utilization · Whole body

    Measurements

    Quality-adjusted life expectancy gain
    0.25 QALYs
    vs sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Liraglutide was associated with an increase in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.25 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and an increase in mean direct healthcare costs of €2558 per patient compared with sitagliptin.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The present study aimed to compare the projected long-term clinical and cost implications associated with liraglutide, sitagliptin and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve glycemic control on metformin monotherapy in France.
    Summary · context
    Long-term (patient lifetime) projections of clinical outcomes and direct costs (2013 Euros; €) were made using a validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  2. 02Computer modelNot a test of Liraglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a simulation of adults with type 2 diabetes in France, liraglutide was projected to raise mean direct healthcare costs by €2558 per patient compared with sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model for France, liraglutide was projected to cost more per patient than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected direct healthcare cost versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Healthcare costs and utilization · Whole body

    Measurements

    Mean direct healthcare cost increase
    2558 € per patient
    vs sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Liraglutide was associated with an increase in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.25 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and an increase in mean direct healthcare costs of €2558 per patient compared with sitagliptin.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The present study aimed to compare the projected long-term clinical and cost implications associated with liraglutide, sitagliptin and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve glycemic control on metformin monotherapy in France.
    Summary · context
    Long-term (patient lifetime) projections of clinical outcomes and direct costs (2013 Euros; €) were made using a validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  3. 03Computer modelNot a test of Liraglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a simulation of adults with type 2 diabetes in France, liraglutide was projected to add 0.23 QALYs of quality-adjusted life expectancy compared with glimepiride.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model for France, liraglutide was projected to give slightly more healthy life years than glimepiride.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected quality-adjusted life expectancy versus glimepiride
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes
    Comparator
    Glimepiride
    Outcome group
    Healthcare costs and utilization · Whole body

    Measurements

    Quality-adjusted life expectancy gain
    0.23 QALYs
    vs glimepiride

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the comparison with glimepiride, liraglutide was associated with an increase in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.23 QALYs and an increase in direct costs of €4695.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The present study aimed to compare the projected long-term clinical and cost implications associated with liraglutide, sitagliptin and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve glycemic control on metformin monotherapy in France.
    Summary · context
    Long-term (patient lifetime) projections of clinical outcomes and direct costs (2013 Euros; €) were made using a validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  4. 04Computer modelNot a test of Liraglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a simulation of adults with type 2 diabetes in France, liraglutide was projected to raise direct costs by €4695 compared with glimepiride.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model for France, liraglutide was projected to cost more than glimepiride.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected direct cost versus glimepiride
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes
    Comparator
    Glimepiride
    Outcome group
    Healthcare costs and utilization · Whole body

    Measurements

    Direct cost increase
    4695 €
    vs glimepiride

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the comparison with glimepiride, liraglutide was associated with an increase in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.23 QALYs and an increase in direct costs of €4695.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The present study aimed to compare the projected long-term clinical and cost implications associated with liraglutide, sitagliptin and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve glycemic control on metformin monotherapy in France.
    Summary · context
    Long-term (patient lifetime) projections of clinical outcomes and direct costs (2013 Euros; €) were made using a validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  5. 05Computer modelNot a test of Liraglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a simulation of adults with type 2 diabetes in France, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of liraglutide was €10,275 per QALY gained versus sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model for France, liraglutide cost about €10,275 for each extra healthy life year compared with sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    Not applicableIncremental cost-effectiveness ratio versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Healthcare costs and utilization · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Based on these estimates, liraglutide was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €10,275 per QALY gained vs sitagliptin and €20,709 per QALY gained vs glimepiride in France.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The present study aimed to compare the projected long-term clinical and cost implications associated with liraglutide, sitagliptin and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve glycemic control on metformin monotherapy in France.
    Summary · context
    Long-term (patient lifetime) projections of clinical outcomes and direct costs (2013 Euros; €) were made using a validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  6. 06Computer modelNot a test of Liraglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a simulation of adults with type 2 diabetes in France, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of liraglutide was €20,709 per QALY gained versus glimepiride.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model for France, liraglutide cost about €20,709 for each extra healthy life year compared with glimepiride.

    Outcome
    Not applicableIncremental cost-effectiveness ratio versus glimepiride
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes
    Comparator
    Glimepiride
    Outcome group
    Healthcare costs and utilization · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Based on these estimates, liraglutide was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €10,275 per QALY gained vs sitagliptin and €20,709 per QALY gained vs glimepiride in France.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The present study aimed to compare the projected long-term clinical and cost implications associated with liraglutide, sitagliptin and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve glycemic control on metformin monotherapy in France.
    Summary · context
    Long-term (patient lifetime) projections of clinical outcomes and direct costs (2013 Euros; €) were made using a validated computer simulation model of type 2 diabetes.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.