Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · 2015

2 results

A randomized controlled trial of liraglutide versus insulin detemir plus sitagliptin: Effective switch from intensive insulin therapy to the once-daily injection in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes.

Inoue Y, Nakamura A, Kondo Y, Hamano K, Satoh S, Terauchi Y

Journal of clinical pharmacology23 Mar 2015Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes switched from basal-bolus insulin, HbA1c change at 24 weeks with liraglutide did not differ significantly from insulin detemir plus sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes, blood sugar control (HbA1c) after switching to liraglutide was not significantly different from insulin detemir plus sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHbA1c change from baseline at 24 weeks
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Insulin detemir plus sitagliptin
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c change
    0.1%
    liraglutide
    HbA1c change
    0.3%
    detemir

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At 24 weeks, the mean changes in HbA1c from baseline were 0.1% ± 0.9% versus 0.3% ± 0.8% in the liraglutide versus detemir groups, respectively (P = .46).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline to 24 weeks.
    Summary · context
    In this multicenter, open-label trial, 90 patients whose diabetes had been controlled well or moderately (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c ] ≤ 7.3%) with basal-bolus insulin regimen were randomly assigned to a liraglutide group or a detemir group and were followed up for 24 weeks.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes switched from basal-bolus insulin, the overall treatment satisfaction score rose in the liraglutide group (P < .001); the rise in the detemir group was not significant (P = .12).

    In plain wordsIn Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes, treatment satisfaction rose after switching to liraglutide; the rise in the detemir group was not significant.

    Outcome
    IncreaseDiabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire overall satisfaction score
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Satisfaction score before
    25.2 points
    liraglutide
    Satisfaction score after
    29.9 points
    liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The "overall" satisfaction score for the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire changed from 25.2 ± 7.4 to 29.9 ± 5.3 (P < .001) and from 26.4 ± 6.1 to 28.3 ± 6.4 (P = .12) in the liraglutide and detemir groups, respectively.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this multicenter, open-label trial, 90 patients whose diabetes had been controlled well or moderately (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c ] ≤ 7.3%) with basal-bolus insulin regimen were randomly assigned to a liraglutide group or a detemir group and were followed up for 24 weeks.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.