Skip to content

Study · Observational study · 2015

12 results

The association of the treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide or insulin with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective observational study.

Paul SK, Klein K, Maggs D, Best JH

Cardiovascular diabetology24 Jan 2015Cited by 45 (Europe PMC)

Summary

BackgroundTo evaluate the association of treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide and/or insulin on macrovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective longitudinal pharmaco-epidemiological study using large ambulatory care data to evaluate the risks of heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke in established T2DM patients who received a first prescription of exenatide twice daily (EBID) or insulin between June 2005 and May 2009, with follow-up data available until December 2012. Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870). Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.ResultsDuring a median 3.5 years of follow-up, cardiovascular event rates per 1000 person-years were significantly lower for the EBID and EBID + insulin groups compared to the insulin group (HF: 4.4 and 6.1 vs. 17.9; MI: 1.1 and 1.2 vs. 2.5; stroke: 2.4 and 1.8 vs. 6.1). Patients in the EBID/EBID + insulin group had significantly reduced risk of HF, MI and stroke by 61/56%, 50/38% and 52/63% respectively, compared to patients in the insulin group (p < 0.01).ConclusionsTreatment with exenatide, with or without concomitant insulin was associated with reduced macrovascular risks compared to insulin; although inherent potential bias in epidemiological studies should be considered.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study12

6 results from studies that gave the peptide. 6 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to lower heart failure event rates than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to fewer heart failure events than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHeart failure event rate
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    HF event rate
    4.4 per 1000 person-years
    EBID
    HF event rate
    17.9 per 1000 person-years
    insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    During a median 3.5 years of follow-up, cardiovascular event rates per 1000 person-years were significantly lower for the EBID and EBID + insulin groups compared to the insulin group (HF: 4.4 and 6.1 vs. 17.9; MI: 1.1 and 1.2 vs. 2.5; stroke: 2.4 and 1.8 vs. 6.1).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.
  2. 02HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to lower myocardial infarction rates than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to fewer heart attacks than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMyocardial infarction event rate
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    MI event rate
    1.1 per 1000 person-years
    EBID
    MI event rate
    2.5 per 1000 person-years
    insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    During a median 3.5 years of follow-up, cardiovascular event rates per 1000 person-years were significantly lower for the EBID and EBID + insulin groups compared to the insulin group (HF: 4.4 and 6.1 vs. 17.9; MI: 1.1 and 1.2 vs. 2.5; stroke: 2.4 and 1.8 vs. 6.1).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.
  3. 03HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to lower stroke rates than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to fewer strokes than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseStroke event rate
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    stroke event rate
    2.4 per 1000 person-years
    EBID
    stroke event rate
    6.1 per 1000 person-years
    insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    During a median 3.5 years of follow-up, cardiovascular event rates per 1000 person-years were significantly lower for the EBID and EBID + insulin groups compared to the insulin group (HF: 4.4 and 6.1 vs. 17.9; MI: 1.1 and 1.2 vs. 2.5; stroke: 2.4 and 1.8 vs. 6.1).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.
  4. 04HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to lower adjusted heart failure risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to lower heart failure risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAdjusted heart failure risk
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    HF risk reduction
    61%
    EBID versus insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Patients in the EBID/EBID + insulin group had significantly reduced risk of HF, MI and stroke by 61/56%, 50/38% and 52/63% respectively, compared to patients in the insulin group (p < 0.01).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.
  5. 05HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to lower adjusted myocardial infarction risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to lower heart attack risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAdjusted myocardial infarction risk
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    MI risk reduction
    50%
    EBID versus insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Patients in the EBID/EBID + insulin group had significantly reduced risk of HF, MI and stroke by 61/56%, 50/38% and 52/63% respectively, compared to patients in the insulin group (p < 0.01).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.
  6. 06HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to lower adjusted stroke risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, exenatide with oral drugs was linked to lower stroke risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAdjusted stroke risk
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    stroke risk reduction
    52%
    EBID versus insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Patients in the EBID/EBID + insulin group had significantly reduced risk of HF, MI and stroke by 61/56%, 50/38% and 52/63% respectively, compared to patients in the insulin group (p < 0.01).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone6

In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  1. 07HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure with oral drugs was linked to lower heart failure rates than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure was linked to fewer heart failure events than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHeart failure event rate with mixed exposure
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    HF event rate
    6.1 per 1000 person-years
    EBID + insulin
    HF event rate
    17.9 per 1000 person-years
    insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    During a median 3.5 years of follow-up, cardiovascular event rates per 1000 person-years were significantly lower for the EBID and EBID + insulin groups compared to the insulin group (HF: 4.4 and 6.1 vs. 17.9; MI: 1.1 and 1.2 vs. 2.5; stroke: 2.4 and 1.8 vs. 6.1).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  2. 08HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure with oral drugs was linked to lower myocardial infarction rates than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure was linked to fewer heart attacks than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMyocardial infarction rate with mixed exposure
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    MI event rate
    1.2 per 1000 person-years
    EBID + insulin
    MI event rate
    2.5 per 1000 person-years
    insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    During a median 3.5 years of follow-up, cardiovascular event rates per 1000 person-years were significantly lower for the EBID and EBID + insulin groups compared to the insulin group (HF: 4.4 and 6.1 vs. 17.9; MI: 1.1 and 1.2 vs. 2.5; stroke: 2.4 and 1.8 vs. 6.1).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  3. 09HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure with oral drugs was linked to lower stroke rates than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure was linked to fewer strokes than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseStroke rate with mixed exposure
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    stroke event rate
    1.8 per 1000 person-years
    EBID + insulin
    stroke event rate
    6.1 per 1000 person-years
    insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    During a median 3.5 years of follow-up, cardiovascular event rates per 1000 person-years were significantly lower for the EBID and EBID + insulin groups compared to the insulin group (HF: 4.4 and 6.1 vs. 17.9; MI: 1.1 and 1.2 vs. 2.5; stroke: 2.4 and 1.8 vs. 6.1).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  4. 10HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure was linked to lower adjusted heart failure risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure was linked to lower heart failure risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAdjusted heart failure risk with mixed exposure
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    HF risk reduction
    56%
    EBID + insulin versus insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Patients in the EBID/EBID + insulin group had significantly reduced risk of HF, MI and stroke by 61/56%, 50/38% and 52/63% respectively, compared to patients in the insulin group (p < 0.01).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  5. 11HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure was linked to lower adjusted myocardial infarction risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure was linked to lower heart attack risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAdjusted myocardial infarction risk with mixed exposure
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    MI risk reduction
    38%
    EBID + insulin versus insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Patients in the EBID/EBID + insulin group had significantly reduced risk of HF, MI and stroke by 61/56%, 50/38% and 52/63% respectively, compared to patients in the insulin group (p < 0.01).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  6. 12HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In T2DM records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure was linked to lower adjusted stroke risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    In plain wordsIn diabetes records, mixed exenatide/insulin exposure was linked to lower stroke risk than insulin with oral drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAdjusted stroke risk with mixed exposure
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    insulin with oral antidiabetes drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    stroke risk reduction
    63%
    EBID + insulin versus insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Patients in the EBID/EBID + insulin group had significantly reduced risk of HF, MI and stroke by 61/56%, 50/38% and 52/63% respectively, compared to patients in the insulin group (p < 0.01).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Three treatment groups were: EBID with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (EBID, n = 2804), insulin with OADs (Insulin, n = 28551), and those who changed medications between EBID and insulin or had combination of EBID and insulin during follow-up, along with OADs (EBID + insulin, n = 7870).
    Summary · context
    Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to evaluate the association of treatment groups with the risks of macrovascular events.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.