In adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, similar proportions reached HbA1c below 7% with liraglutide and glargine (45.9% vs 48.4%), so superiority of glargine was not shown.
In plain wordsIn adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, about the same share reached the HbA1c target with liraglutide as with glargine insulin.
- Peptide
- Liraglutide
- Outcome
- No significant changeProportion reaching HbA1c <7%
- Study
n = 978
- Comparator
- Insulin glargine
- Outcome group
- Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
- Studied dose
- 1.8 mg daily · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- HbA1c <7% responders
- 45.9%
- liraglutide
- HbA1c <7% responders
- 48.4%
- glargine
Source sentences
Similar numbers of subjects in both groups attained an HbA1c level of <7% (48.4 vs. 45.9%); therefore, superiority of glargine over liraglutide was not observed (p = 0.44).
2 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
This randomized, multinational, open-label trial included subjects treated for T2DM with metformin ± sulphonylurea, who had glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 7.5-12%.
Subjects were assigned to 24 weeks of insulin glargine, titrated to target fasting plasma glucose of 4.0-5.5 mmol/L or liraglutide, escalated to the highest approved clinical dose of 1.8 mg daily.