Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 55 · 2015

10 results

Afamelanotide and narrowband UV-B phototherapy for the treatment of vitiligo: a randomized multicenter trial.

Lim HW, Grimes PE, Agbai O, Hamzavi I, Henderson M, Haddican M, Linkner RV, Lebwohl M

JAMA dermatology1 Jan 2015Cited by 114 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study10

10 results from studies that gave the peptide. 10 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with generalized vitiligo, afamelanotide implant plus NB-UV-B gave a better response than NB-UV-B alone at day 56.

    In plain wordsIn adults with vitiligo, adding afamelanotide to light therapy gave a better response than light therapy alone at day 56.

    Outcome
    IncreaseResponse on Vitiligo Area Scoring Index and VETF scoring at day 56
    Study

    n = 55

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Pigmentation · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Response in the combination therapy group was superior to that in the NB-UV-B monotherapy group (P < .05) at day 56.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We enrolled men and women 18 years or older with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPTs) III to VI and a confirmed diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo that involved 15% to 50% of total body surface area.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to combination therapy (n = 28) vs NB-UV-B monotherapy (n = 27).
    Summary · context
    After 1 month of NB-UV-B phototherapy, 16 mg of afamelanotide was administered subcutaneously to the combination therapy group monthly for 4 months while NB-UV-B phototherapy continued; the other group continued to receive NB-UV-B monotherapy.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with vitiligo, afamelanotide plus NB-UV-B led to repigmentation of the face earlier than NB-UV-B alone (41.0 vs 61.0 days).

    In plain wordsIn adults with vitiligo, adding afamelanotide led to facial repigmentation sooner than light therapy alone.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTime to repigmentation of the face
    Study

    n = 55

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Pigmentation · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Time to face repigmentation
    41 days
    combination therapy
    Time to face repigmentation
    61 days
    NB-UV-B monotherapy

    Source sentences

    Summary
    For the face and upper extremities, a significantly higher percentage of patients in the combination therapy group achieved repigmentation, and at earlier times (face, 41.0 vs 61.0 days [P = .001]; upper extremities, 46.0 vs 69.0 days [P = .003]).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We enrolled men and women 18 years or older with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPTs) III to VI and a confirmed diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo that involved 15% to 50% of total body surface area.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to combination therapy (n = 28) vs NB-UV-B monotherapy (n = 27).
    Summary · context
    After 1 month of NB-UV-B phototherapy, 16 mg of afamelanotide was administered subcutaneously to the combination therapy group monthly for 4 months while NB-UV-B phototherapy continued; the other group continued to receive NB-UV-B monotherapy.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with vitiligo, afamelanotide plus NB-UV-B led to repigmentation of the upper extremities earlier than NB-UV-B alone (46.0 vs 69.0 days).

    In plain wordsIn adults with vitiligo, adding afamelanotide led to arm repigmentation sooner than light therapy alone.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTime to repigmentation of the upper extremities
    Study

    n = 55

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Pigmentation · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Time to upper extremity repigmentation
    46 days
    combination therapy
    Time to upper extremity repigmentation
    69 days
    NB-UV-B monotherapy

    Source sentences

    Summary
    For the face and upper extremities, a significantly higher percentage of patients in the combination therapy group achieved repigmentation, and at earlier times (face, 41.0 vs 61.0 days [P = .001]; upper extremities, 46.0 vs 69.0 days [P = .003]).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We enrolled men and women 18 years or older with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPTs) III to VI and a confirmed diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo that involved 15% to 50% of total body surface area.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to combination therapy (n = 28) vs NB-UV-B monotherapy (n = 27).
    Summary · context
    After 1 month of NB-UV-B phototherapy, 16 mg of afamelanotide was administered subcutaneously to the combination therapy group monthly for 4 months while NB-UV-B phototherapy continued; the other group continued to receive NB-UV-B monotherapy.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with vitiligo, repigmentation at day 168 was 48.64% with afamelanotide plus NB-UV-B versus 33.26% with NB-UV-B alone.

    In plain wordsIn adults with vitiligo, adding afamelanotide gave more repigmentation at day 168 than light therapy alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseRepigmentation at day 168
    Study

    n = 55

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Pigmentation · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Repigmentation
    48.64%
    combination therapy, day 168
    Repigmentation
    33.26%
    NB-UV-B monotherapy, day 168

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the combination therapy group, repigmentation was 48.64% (95% CI, 39.49%-57.80%) at day 168 vs 33.26% (95% CI, 24.18%-42.33%) in the NB-UV-B monotherapy group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We enrolled men and women 18 years or older with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPTs) III to VI and a confirmed diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo that involved 15% to 50% of total body surface area.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to combination therapy (n = 28) vs NB-UV-B monotherapy (n = 27).
    Summary · context
    After 1 month of NB-UV-B phototherapy, 16 mg of afamelanotide was administered subcutaneously to the combination therapy group monthly for 4 months while NB-UV-B phototherapy continued; the other group continued to receive NB-UV-B monotherapy.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    Erythema was a notable adverse event in both the combination group and the NB-UV-B monotherapy group.

    In plain wordsRedness of the skin occurred in both groups, with and without afamelanotide.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedErythema
    Study

    n = 55

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Notable adverse events included erythema in both groups and minor infections and nausea in the combination therapy group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We enrolled men and women 18 years or older with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPTs) III to VI and a confirmed diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo that involved 15% to 50% of total body surface area.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to combination therapy (n = 28) vs NB-UV-B monotherapy (n = 27).
    Summary · context
    After 1 month of NB-UV-B phototherapy, 16 mg of afamelanotide was administered subcutaneously to the combination therapy group monthly for 4 months while NB-UV-B phototherapy continued; the other group continued to receive NB-UV-B monotherapy.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    Minor infections were a notable adverse event in the afamelanotide plus NB-UV-B group.

    In plain wordsMinor infections were reported in the group that received afamelanotide with light therapy.

    Outcome
    IncreaseMinor infections
    Study

    n = 55

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Infection
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Notable adverse events included erythema in both groups and minor infections and nausea in the combination therapy group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We enrolled men and women 18 years or older with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPTs) III to VI and a confirmed diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo that involved 15% to 50% of total body surface area.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to combination therapy (n = 28) vs NB-UV-B monotherapy (n = 27).
    Summary · context
    After 1 month of NB-UV-B phototherapy, 16 mg of afamelanotide was administered subcutaneously to the combination therapy group monthly for 4 months while NB-UV-B phototherapy continued; the other group continued to receive NB-UV-B monotherapy.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    Nausea was a notable adverse event in the afamelanotide plus NB-UV-B group.

    In plain wordsNausea was reported in the group that received afamelanotide with light therapy.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNausea
    Study

    n = 55

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Notable adverse events included erythema in both groups and minor infections and nausea in the combination therapy group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We enrolled men and women 18 years or older with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPTs) III to VI and a confirmed diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo that involved 15% to 50% of total body surface area.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to combination therapy (n = 28) vs NB-UV-B monotherapy (n = 27).
    Summary · context
    After 1 month of NB-UV-B phototherapy, 16 mg of afamelanotide was administered subcutaneously to the combination therapy group monthly for 4 months while NB-UV-B phototherapy continued; the other group continued to receive NB-UV-B monotherapy.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with generalized vitiligo, a significantly higher percentage of patients achieved repigmentation of the face and upper extremities with afamelanotide plus NB-UV-B than with NB-UV-B alone.

    In plain wordsIn adults with vitiligo, more people given afamelanotide with light therapy had skin color return on the face and arms than with light therapy alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProportion of patients with repigmentation of the face and upper extremities
    Study

    n = 55

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Pigmentation · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    For the face and upper extremities, a significantly higher percentage of patients in the combination therapy group achieved repigmentation, and at earlier times (face, 41.0 vs 61.0 days [P = .001]; upper extremities, 46.0 vs 69.0 days [P = .003]).
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes IV to VI, afamelanotide plus NB-UV-B improved the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index at days 56 and 84.

    In plain wordsIn people with darker skin types IV to VI, adding afamelanotide improved the vitiligo score at days 56 and 84.

    Outcome
    IncreaseVitiligo Area Scoring Index in SPTs IV to VI at days 56 and 84
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Pigmentation · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Comparison between Fitzpatrick SPTs showed patients with SPTs IV to VI in the combination therapy group had improvement in the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index at days 56 and 84 (P < .05)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We enrolled men and women 18 years or older with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPTs) III to VI and a confirmed diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo that involved 15% to 50% of total body surface area.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to combination therapy (n = 28) vs NB-UV-B monotherapy (n = 27).
    Summary · context
    After 1 month of NB-UV-B phototherapy, 16 mg of afamelanotide was administered subcutaneously to the combination therapy group monthly for 4 months while NB-UV-B phototherapy continued; the other group continued to receive NB-UV-B monotherapy.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with Fitzpatrick skin phototype III, no significant difference was noted between afamelanotide plus NB-UV-B and NB-UV-B alone.

    In plain wordsIn people with skin type III, adding afamelanotide made no significant difference to the vitiligo score.

    Outcome
    No significant changeVitiligo Area Scoring Index in SPT III
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    NB-UV-B monotherapy
    Outcome group
    Pigmentation · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    16 mg · subcutaneous · 4 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    no significant difference was noted in patients with SPT III.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We enrolled men and women 18 years or older with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPTs) III to VI and a confirmed diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo that involved 15% to 50% of total body surface area.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to combination therapy (n = 28) vs NB-UV-B monotherapy (n = 27).
    Summary · context
    After 1 month of NB-UV-B phototherapy, 16 mg of afamelanotide was administered subcutaneously to the combination therapy group monthly for 4 months while NB-UV-B phototherapy continued; the other group continued to receive NB-UV-B monotherapy.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 1NCT01430195

Afamelanotide and Narrow-Band Ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) Light in the Treatment of Nonsegmental Vitiligo (NSV)

Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals Limitedn = 56Jun 2011 to Nov 2012

Vitiligo

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 22 Mar 2013

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    13 Oct 2026, 21:44 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    13 Oct 2026, 16:31 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.