In children with monosymptomatic enuresis, four desmopressin recipients withdrew versus 20 alarm recipients after randomization.
In plain wordsIn children with bedwetting, withdrawal occurred in 5.2% with desmopressin versus 30.7% with an alarm.
- Peptide
- Desmopressin
- Outcome
- DecreaseWithdrawal after randomization
- Study
n = 142
- Comparator
- enuretic alarm
- Outcome group
- Treatment adherence and retention · Kidney and urinary
- Studied dose
- Dose not stated · sublingual · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Withdrawals
- 4 children
- desmopressin
- Withdrawal proportion
- 5.2%
- desmopressin
- Withdrawals
- 20 children
- alarm
- Withdrawal proportion
- 30.7%
- alarm
Source sentences
Overall 4 children (5.2%) in the desmopressin group and 20 (30.7%) in the enuretic alarm group withdrew after randomization.
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
We compared the long-term success of desmopressin sublingual lyophilisate formulation and enuretic alarm therapy in children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis, and determined predictive factors for treatment success.
A total of 142 children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis were randomized to receive treatment consisting of desmopressin or enuretic alarm for 6 months.
Additional intention to treat analyses were performed, considering cases with missing data as failures.