Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2015

1 result

Incretin-based therapies and acute pancreatitis risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Giorda CB, Sacerdote C, Nada E, Marafetti L, Baldi I, Gnavi R

Endocrine22 Aug 2014Cited by 51 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, pooled incretin-based therapies (GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors) showed no difference in overall pancreatitis risk versus non-users (odds ratio 1.08).

    In plain wordsIn people with type 2 diabetes, incretin drugs as a group were not linked to more pancreatitis than no incretin use.

    Outcome
    No significant changeAcute pancreatitis risk
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Non-users of incretins
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Measurements

    Odds ratio, pancreatitis
    1.08
    incretin users vs non-users

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No difference was found in the overall risk of pancreatitis between incretin users and non-users (odds ratio 1.08; 95 % CI [0.84-1.40]).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Studies were evaluated against the following criteria: design (either cohort or case-control); outcome definition (incidence of pancreatitis); exposure definition (new or current or past incretins users); and comparison between patients receiving incretins or not for type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Six studies meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.