Skip to content

Study · Observational study · n = 376 · 2013

4 results

Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles.

Lin MH, Wu FS, Lee RK, Li SH, Lin SY, Hwu YM

Fertility and sterility28 Aug 2013Cited by 110 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study4

4 results from studies that gave the peptide. 4 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In normal IVF-ICSI responders, adding triptorelin to hCG was linked to higher implantation rates than hCG alone.

    In plain wordsIn normal IVF-ICSI responders, triptorelin plus hCG was linked to higher implantation rates compared with hCG alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseImplantation rate
    Study

    n = 376

    Comparator
    hCG alone
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.2 mgAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Implantation rate
    29.6%
    dual trigger
    Implantation rate
    18.4%
    hCG trigger

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The dual trigger group demonstrated statistically significantly higher implantation (29.6% vs. 18.4%), clinical pregnancy (50.7% vs. 40.1%), and live-birth (41.3% vs. 30.4%) rates as compared with the hCG trigger group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective cohort study.
    Summary · context
    Normal responders to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation who were undergoing IVF-ICSI with a GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Summary · context
    Standard dosage of hCG trigger (6,500 IU of recombinant hCG) versus dual trigger (0.2 mg of triptorelin and 6,500 IU of recombinant hCG).
  2. 02HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In normal IVF-ICSI responders, adding triptorelin to hCG was linked to higher clinical pregnancy rates than hCG alone.

    In plain wordsIn normal IVF-ICSI responders, triptorelin plus hCG was linked to higher pregnancy rates compared with hCG alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseClinical pregnancy rate
    Study

    n = 376

    Comparator
    hCG alone
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.2 mgAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Clinical pregnancy rate
    50.7%
    dual trigger
    Clinical pregnancy rate
    40.1%
    hCG trigger

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The dual trigger group demonstrated statistically significantly higher implantation (29.6% vs. 18.4%), clinical pregnancy (50.7% vs. 40.1%), and live-birth (41.3% vs. 30.4%) rates as compared with the hCG trigger group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective cohort study.
    Summary · context
    Normal responders to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation who were undergoing IVF-ICSI with a GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Summary · context
    Standard dosage of hCG trigger (6,500 IU of recombinant hCG) versus dual trigger (0.2 mg of triptorelin and 6,500 IU of recombinant hCG).
  3. 03HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In normal IVF-ICSI responders, adding triptorelin to hCG was linked to higher live-birth rates than hCG alone.

    In plain wordsIn normal IVF-ICSI responders, triptorelin plus hCG was linked to higher live-birth rates compared with hCG alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseLive-birth rate
    Study

    n = 376

    Comparator
    hCG alone
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.2 mgAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Live-birth rate
    41.3%
    dual trigger
    Live-birth rate
    30.4%
    hCG trigger

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The dual trigger group demonstrated statistically significantly higher implantation (29.6% vs. 18.4%), clinical pregnancy (50.7% vs. 40.1%), and live-birth (41.3% vs. 30.4%) rates as compared with the hCG trigger group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective cohort study.
    Summary · context
    Normal responders to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation who were undergoing IVF-ICSI with a GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Summary · context
    Standard dosage of hCG trigger (6,500 IU of recombinant hCG) versus dual trigger (0.2 mg of triptorelin and 6,500 IU of recombinant hCG).
  4. 04HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In normal IVF-ICSI responders, embryo quality did not differ significantly between triptorelin plus hCG and hCG alone.

    In plain wordsIn normal IVF-ICSI responders, embryo quality was similar with triptorelin plus hCG and hCG alone.

    Outcome
    No significant changeEmbryo quality
    Study

    n = 376

    Comparator
    hCG alone
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.2 mgAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was no statistically significant difference in terms of patient demographics, cycle parameters, or embryo quality.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective cohort study.
    Summary · context
    Normal responders to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation who were undergoing IVF-ICSI with a GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Summary · context
    Standard dosage of hCG trigger (6,500 IU of recombinant hCG) versus dual trigger (0.2 mg of triptorelin and 6,500 IU of recombinant hCG).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials4

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

4 trials · 2 completed · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 4NCT04992468

Dual Trigger for Elective Fertility Preservation

Fundación Santiago Dexeus Fontn = 1365 Oct 2021 to 25 Apr 2023

Infertility

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 25 Jul 2023
Status unknownNot applicableNCT04717752

A Randomized Controlled Study of Different Trigger Modes of Antagonist Regimen in Patients With Low Ovarian Reserve

Nanjing Universityn = 310est. 20 Jan 2021 to est. 31 Dec 2021

Poor Ovarian Response

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 28 Jan 2021
Status unknownPhase 4NCT02715336

Efficacy and Safety of Medication Used to Stimulate Ovulation

Create Fertility Centern = 666Oct 2015 to est. Sept 2021

IVF Cycle · Ovarian Stimulation · Egg Retrieval · Pregnancy · Miscarriages · Ovarian Hyperstimulation

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 20 Jul 2020
CompletedNot applicableNCT02368964

IVF Treatment in Women With Immature Oocytes in Previous Cycle

Sheba Medical Centern = 1001 Feb 2015 to 1 Jun 2020

Infertility

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 24 Jun 2022

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.