Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 561 · 2014

9 results

Tolerability of nausea and vomiting and associations with weight loss in a randomized trial of liraglutide in obese, non-diabetic adults.

Lean ME, Carraro R, Finer N, Hartvig H, Lindegaard ML, Rössner S, Van Gaal L, Astrup A

International journal of obesity (2005)14 Aug 2013Cited by 135 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study9

9 results from studies that gave the peptide. 9 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In obese non-diabetic adults, more participants reported at least one episode of nausea or vomiting with liraglutide 1.2-3.0 mg (17-38%) than with placebo or orlistat (both 4%) in year 1.

    In plain wordsIn obese adults without diabetes, nausea or vomiting was reported more often with liraglutide than with placebo or orlistat in the first year.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNausea or vomiting (at least 1 episode) in year 1
    Study

    n = 561

    Comparator
    Placebo or orlistat
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    1.2-3.0 mg · subcutaneous · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with nausea/vomiting
    17 to 38%
    liraglutide 1.2-3.0 mg
    Participants with nausea/vomiting
    4%
    placebo
    Participants with nausea/vomiting
    4%
    orlistat

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In year 1, more participants reported ⩾1 episode of nausea/vomiting on treatment with liraglutide 1.2-3.0 mg (17-38%) than with placebo or orlistat (both 4%, P⩽0.001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After commencing a 500-kcal/day deficit diet plus exercise, 564 participants (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomly assigned (after a 2-week run-in period) to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3.0 mg), placebo or open-label orlistat (120 mg × 3 per day).
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In obese non-diabetic adults on liraglutide 3.0 mg, 48% reported some nausea.

    In plain wordsIn obese adults without diabetes taking liraglutide 3.0 mg, 48% reported some nausea.

    Outcome
    Not applicableNausea reported, liraglutide 3.0 mg
    Study

    n = 93

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg · subcutaneous · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with nausea
    48%
    liraglutide 3.0 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among participants on liraglutide 3.0 mg, 48% reported some nausea
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After commencing a 500-kcal/day deficit diet plus exercise, 564 participants (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomly assigned (after a 2-week run-in period) to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3.0 mg), placebo or open-label orlistat (120 mg × 3 per day).
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In obese non-diabetic adults on liraglutide 3.0 mg, 13% reported some vomiting.

    In plain wordsIn obese adults without diabetes taking liraglutide 3.0 mg, 13% reported some vomiting.

    Outcome
    Not applicableVomiting reported, liraglutide 3.0 mg
    Study

    n = 93

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg · subcutaneous · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with vomiting
    13%
    liraglutide 3.0 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among participants on liraglutide 3.0 mg, 48% reported some nausea and 13% some vomiting
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After commencing a 500-kcal/day deficit diet plus exercise, 564 participants (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomly assigned (after a 2-week run-in period) to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3.0 mg), placebo or open-label orlistat (120 mg × 3 per day).
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In obese non-diabetic adults on liraglutide 3.0 mg, 4 of 93 participants (4%) reported withdrawals.

    In plain wordsIn obese adults without diabetes taking liraglutide 3.0 mg, 4 of 93 people (4%) reported withdrawals.

    Outcome
    Not applicableWithdrawals, liraglutide 3.0 mg
    Study

    n = 93

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg · subcutaneous · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Withdrawals
    4 participants
    liraglutide 3.0 mg, of 93

    Source sentences

    Summary
    but only 4 out of 93 (4%) reported withdrawals.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After commencing a 500-kcal/day deficit diet plus exercise, 564 participants (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomly assigned (after a 2-week run-in period) to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3.0 mg), placebo or open-label orlistat (120 mg × 3 per day).
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese non-diabetic adults on liraglutide 3.0 mg, weight loss, with or without nausea/vomiting, was significantly greater than with placebo.

    In plain wordsIn obese adults without diabetes, liraglutide 3.0 mg led to more weight loss than placebo, whether or not nausea or vomiting occurred.

    Outcome
    Increase1-year weight loss versus placebo
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg · subcutaneous · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both weight losses were significantly greater than the respective weight losses for participants on placebo (P<0.001) or orlistat (P<0.05).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The mean 1-year weight loss on treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg from randomization was 9.2 kg for participants reporting nausea/vomiting episodes, versus 6.3 kg for those with none (a treatment difference of 2.9 kg (95% confidence interval 0.5-5.3); P=0.02).
    Summary · context
    After commencing a 500-kcal/day deficit diet plus exercise, 564 participants (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomly assigned (after a 2-week run-in period) to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3.0 mg), placebo or open-label orlistat (120 mg × 3 per day).
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese non-diabetic adults on liraglutide 3.0 mg, weight loss, with or without nausea/vomiting, was significantly greater than with orlistat.

    In plain wordsIn obese adults without diabetes, liraglutide 3.0 mg led to more weight loss than orlistat, whether or not nausea or vomiting occurred.

    Outcome
    Increase1-year weight loss versus orlistat
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Orlistat
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg · subcutaneous · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both weight losses were significantly greater than the respective weight losses for participants on placebo (P<0.001) or orlistat (P<0.05).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The mean 1-year weight loss on treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg from randomization was 9.2 kg for participants reporting nausea/vomiting episodes, versus 6.3 kg for those with none (a treatment difference of 2.9 kg (95% confidence interval 0.5-5.3); P=0.02).
    Summary · context
    After commencing a 500-kcal/day deficit diet plus exercise, 564 participants (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomly assigned (after a 2-week run-in period) to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3.0 mg), placebo or open-label orlistat (120 mg × 3 per day).
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In obese non-diabetic adults on liraglutide, most nausea and vomiting episodes occurred during dose escalation (weeks 1-6) and were mild or moderate.

    In plain wordsIn obese adults without diabetes taking liraglutide, most nausea and vomiting happened in the first weeks of raising the dose and was mild or moderate.

    Outcome
    Not applicableTiming and severity of nausea and vomiting episodes
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    1.2-3.0 mg · subcutaneous · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Most episodes occurred during dose escalation (weeks 1-6), with 'mild' or 'moderate' symptoms.
  8. 08HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In obese non-diabetic adults on liraglutide 3.0 mg, 1-year weight loss was greater in participants who reported nausea or vomiting (9.2 kg) than in those with none (6.3 kg).

    In plain wordsIn obese adults without diabetes on liraglutide 3.0 mg, nausea or vomiting was linked to greater one-year weight loss than no nausea or vomiting.

    Outcome
    Increase1-year weight loss by nausea/vomiting status
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Liraglutide 3.0 mg without nausea/vomiting
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg · subcutaneous · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Weight loss
    9.2 kg
    with nausea/vomiting
    Weight loss
    6.3 kg
    no nausea/vomiting
    Treatment difference
    2.9 kg
    95% CI 0.5-5.3

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The mean 1-year weight loss on treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg from randomization was 9.2 kg for participants reporting nausea/vomiting episodes, versus 6.3 kg for those with none (a treatment difference of 2.9 kg (95% confidence interval 0.5-5.3); P=0.02).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After commencing a 500-kcal/day deficit diet plus exercise, 564 participants (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomly assigned (after a 2-week run-in period) to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3.0 mg), placebo or open-label orlistat (120 mg × 3 per day).
  9. 09HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In obese non-diabetic adults on liraglutide 3.0 mg, quality-of-life scores at 20 weeks improved similarly with or without nausea or vomiting.

    In plain wordsIn obese adults without diabetes on liraglutide 3.0 mg, quality of life improved similarly whether or not nausea or vomiting occurred.

    Outcome
    No significant changeQuality-of-life score at 20 weeks by nausea/vomiting status
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Liraglutide 3.0 mg without nausea/vomiting
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg · subcutaneous · 20 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Quality-of-life scores at 20 weeks improved similarly with or without nausea/vomiting on treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After commencing a 500-kcal/day deficit diet plus exercise, 564 participants (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomly assigned (after a 2-week run-in period) to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3.0 mg), placebo or open-label orlistat (120 mg × 3 per day).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 2Results postedNCT00422058

The Effect of Liraglutide on Body Weight in Obese Subjects Without Diabetes

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 56410 Jan 2007 to 30 Apr 2009

Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder · Obesity

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.