Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2013

2 results

Evaluating the short-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes failing metformin monotherapy in the United States.

Langer J, Hunt B, Valentine WJ

Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP1 Apr 2013Cited by 30 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneOther designOther

    In a model of adults with type 2 diabetes failing metformin, the cost per patient reaching HbA1c below 7% was lowest with liraglutide 1.2 mg ($7,993) and highest with sitagliptin ($11,570).

    In plain wordsIn a cost model of adults with type 2 diabetes, reaching the HbA1c target cost least with liraglutide 1.2 mg and most with sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    Not applicableCost per patient achieving HbA1c below 7%
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Sitagliptin 100 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Cost per patient with HbA1c <7%
    7993 USD
    liraglutide 1.2 mg
    Cost per patient with HbA1c <7%
    11,570 USD
    sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The cost per patient achieving an HbA1c less than 7% was lowest for patients receiving liraglutide 1.2 mg ($7,993) and highest for patients receiving sitagliptin ($11,570).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Data were taken from a 52-week randomized, controlled trial (NCT00700817) in which adults with type 2 diabetes (mean age = 55 years, HbA1c = 8.4%, body mass index = 33 kg/m2) failing metformin monotherapy were randomly allocated to receive either liraglutide 1.2 mg, liraglutide 1.8 mg, or sitaglipti…

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneOther designOther

    In a model of adults with type 2 diabetes failing metformin, annual cost of control was $10,335 with liraglutide 1.2 mg and $11,755 with liraglutide 1.8 mg versus $16,858 with sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a cost model of adults with type 2 diabetes, the yearly cost of reaching full control was lower with liraglutide than with sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    Not applicableAnnual cost of control (HbA1c target, no hypoglycemia, no weight gain)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Sitagliptin 100 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Annual cost of control
    10,335 USD
    liraglutide 1.2 mg
    Annual cost of control
    11,755 USD
    liraglutide 1.8 mg
    Annual cost of control
    16,858 USD
    sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Annual mean costs of control were $10,335 on liraglutide 1.2 mg and $11,755 on liraglutide 1.8 mg versus $16,858 on sitagliptin.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Data were taken from a 52-week randomized, controlled trial (NCT00700817) in which adults with type 2 diabetes (mean age = 55 years, HbA1c = 8.4%, body mass index = 33 kg/m2) failing metformin monotherapy were randomly allocated to receive either liraglutide 1.2 mg, liraglutide 1.8 mg, or sitaglipti…

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT00700817

The Effect of Liraglutide Compared to Sitagliptin, Both in Combination With Metformin on Glycaemic Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 665Jun 2008 to Jun 2010

Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.