Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 148 · 2013

25 results

Pharmacodynamic characteristics of lixisenatide once daily versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on metformin.

Kapitza C, Forst T, Coester HV, Poitiers F, Ruus P, Hincelin-Méry A

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism25 Feb 2013Cited by 151 (Europe PMC)

Summary

AimAssess the pharmacodynamics of lixisenatide once daily (QD) versus liraglutide QD in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on metformin.MethodsIn this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast. Primary endpoint was change in postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) exposure from baseline to day 28 during a breakfast test meal.ResultsLixisenatide reduced PPG significantly more than liraglutide [mean change in AUC(0:30-4:30h) : -12.6 vs. -4.0 h·mmol/L, respectively; p < 0.0001 (0:30 h = start of meal)]. Change in maximum PPG excursion was -3.9 mmol/l vs. -1.4 mmol/l, respectively (p < 0.0001). More lixisenatide-treated patients achieved 2-h PPG <7.8 mmol/l (69% vs. 29%). Changes in fasting plasma glucose were greater with liraglutide (-0.3 vs. -1.3 mmol/l, p < 0.0001). Lixisenatide provided greater decreases in postprandial glucagon (p < 0.05), insulin (p < 0.0001) and C-peptide (p < 0.0001). Mean HbA1c decreased in both treatment groups (from 7.2% to 6.9% with lixisenatide vs. 7.4% to 6.9% with liraglutide) as did body weight (-1.6 kg vs. -2.4 kg, respectively). Overall incidence of adverse events was lower with lixisenatide (55%) versus liraglutide (65%), with no serious events or hypoglycaemia reported.ConclusionsOnce daily prebreakfast lixisenatide provided a significantly greater reduction in PPG (AUC) during a morning test meal versus prebreakfast liraglutide. Lixisenatide provided significant decreases in postprandial insulin, C-peptide (vs. an increase with liraglutide) and glucagon, and better gastrointestinal tolerability than liraglutide.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study25

25 results from studies that gave the peptide. 25 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, postprandial glucose AUC changed by -12.6 with lixisenatide versus -4.0 h·mmol/L with liraglutide (p < 0.0001).

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide reduced post-meal glucose exposure more than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreasePostprandial glucose AUC
    Study

    n = 148

    Comparator
    Liraglutide once daily, titrated to 1.8 mg
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean change in postprandial plasma glucose AUC(0:30-4:30h)
    −12.6 h·mmol/L
    lixisenatide, baseline to day 28
    Mean change in postprandial plasma glucose AUC(0:30-4:30h)
    −4 h·mmol/L
    liraglutide, baseline to day 28
    P value
    < 0.0001 unitless
    postprandial plasma glucose AUC, lixisenatide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide reduced PPG significantly more than liraglutide [mean change in AUC(0:30-4:30h) : -12.6 vs. -4.0 h·mmol/L, respectively; p < 0.0001 (0:30 h = start of meal)].
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, liraglutide reduced postprandial plasma glucose exposure less than lixisenatide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide lowered blood sugar after a meal, but less than lixisenatide did.

    Outcome
    DecreaseChange in postprandial plasma glucose AUC(0:30-4:30h)
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Change in PPG AUC(0:30-4:30h)
    −4 h·mmol/L
    liraglutide
    Change in PPG AUC(0:30-4:30h)
    −12.6 h·mmol/L
    lixisenatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide reduced PPG significantly more than liraglutide [mean change in AUC(0:30-4:30h) : -12.6 vs. -4.0 h·mmol/L, respectively; p < 0.0001 (0:30 h = start of meal)].
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Primary endpoint was change in postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) exposure from baseline to day 28 during a breakfast test meal.
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, maximum glucose excursion changed by -3.9 with lixisenatide versus -1.4 mmol/l with liraglutide (p < 0.0001).

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide reduced the maximum post-meal glucose rise more than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMaximum postprandial glucose excursion
    Study

    n = 148

    Comparator
    Liraglutide once daily, titrated to 1.8 mg
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Change in maximum postprandial plasma glucose excursion
    −3.9 mmol/l
    lixisenatide
    Change in maximum postprandial plasma glucose excursion
    −1.4 mmol/l
    liraglutide
    P value
    < 0.0001 unitless
    maximum postprandial glucose excursion, lixisenatide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Change in maximum PPG excursion was -3.9 mmol/l vs. -1.4 mmol/l, respectively (p < 0.0001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, 69% achieved 2-h glucose <7.8 mmol/l with lixisenatide versus 29% with liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, more reached the post-meal glucose target with lixisenatide than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    Increase2-hour postprandial glucose below 7.8 mmol/l
    Study

    n = 148

    Comparator
    Liraglutide once daily, titrated to 1.8 mg
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Patients with 2-h postprandial glucose <7.8 mmol/l
    69%
    lixisenatide
    Patients with 2-h postprandial glucose <7.8 mmol/l
    29%
    liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    More lixisenatide-treated patients achieved 2-h PPG <7.8 mmol/l (69% vs. 29%).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, fasting glucose changed by -0.3 with lixisenatide versus -1.3 mmol/l with liraglutide (p < 0.0001).

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, fasting glucose decreased less with lixisenatide than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseFasting plasma glucose
    Study

    n = 148

    Comparator
    Liraglutide once daily, titrated to 1.8 mg
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Change in fasting plasma glucose
    −0.3 mmol/l
    lixisenatide
    Change in fasting plasma glucose
    −1.3 mmol/l
    liraglutide
    P value
    < 0.0001 unitless
    fasting plasma glucose change, lixisenatide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in fasting plasma glucose were greater with liraglutide (-0.3 vs. -1.3 mmol/l, p < 0.0001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide reduced postprandial glucagon more than liraglutide (p < 0.05).

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide reduced post-meal glucagon more than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreasePostprandial glucagon
    Study

    n = 148

    Comparator
    Liraglutide once daily, titrated to 1.8 mg
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.05 unitless
    postprandial glucagon, lixisenatide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide provided greater decreases in postprandial glucagon (p < 0.05), insulin (p < 0.0001) and C-peptide (p < 0.0001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide reduced postprandial insulin more than liraglutide (p < 0.0001).

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide reduced post-meal insulin more than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreasePostprandial insulin
    Study

    n = 148

    Comparator
    Liraglutide once daily, titrated to 1.8 mg
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.0001 unitless
    postprandial insulin, lixisenatide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide provided greater decreases in postprandial glucagon (p < 0.05), insulin (p < 0.0001) and C-peptide (p < 0.0001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide reduced postprandial C-peptide more than liraglutide (p < 0.0001).

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide reduced post-meal C-peptide more than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreasePostprandial C-peptide
    Study

    n = 148

    Comparator
    Liraglutide once daily, titrated to 1.8 mg
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.0001 unitless
    postprandial C-peptide, lixisenatide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide provided greater decreases in postprandial glucagon (p < 0.05), insulin (p < 0.0001) and C-peptide (p < 0.0001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, adverse events occurred in 55% with lixisenatide versus 65% with liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, adverse events were less frequent with lixisenatide than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseOverall adverse event incidence
    Study

    n = 148

    Comparator
    Liraglutide once daily, titrated to 1.8 mg
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Incidence of adverse events
    55%
    lixisenatide
    Incidence of adverse events
    65%
    liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Overall incidence of adverse events was lower with lixisenatide (55%) versus liraglutide (65%), with no serious events or hypoglycaemia reported.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, liraglutide reduced the maximum postprandial glucose excursion less than lixisenatide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide lowered the highest blood sugar after a meal, but less than lixisenatide did.

    Outcome
    DecreaseChange in maximum postprandial glucose excursion
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Change in maximum PPG excursion
    −1.4 mmol/l
    liraglutide
    Change in maximum PPG excursion
    −3.9 mmol/l
    lixisenatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Change in maximum PPG excursion was -3.9 mmol/l vs. -1.4 mmol/l, respectively (p < 0.0001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  11. 11HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, 29% of liraglutide patients reached 2-h postprandial glucose below 7.8 mmol/l, against 69% with lixisenatide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, fewer people reached the 2-hour after-meal sugar target with liraglutide than with lixisenatide.

    Outcome
    Not applicablePatients with 2-h postprandial glucose below 7.8 mmol/l
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Patients with 2-h PPG <7.8 mmol/l
    29%
    liraglutide
    Patients with 2-h PPG <7.8 mmol/l
    69%
    lixisenatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    More lixisenatide-treated patients achieved 2-h PPG <7.8 mmol/l (69% vs. 29%).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  12. 12HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, liraglutide reduced fasting plasma glucose more than lixisenatide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide lowered fasting blood sugar more than lixisenatide did.

    Outcome
    DecreaseChange in fasting plasma glucose
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Change in fasting plasma glucose
    −1.3 mmol/l
    liraglutide
    Change in fasting plasma glucose
    −0.3 mmol/l
    lixisenatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in fasting plasma glucose were greater with liraglutide (-0.3 vs. -1.3 mmol/l, p < 0.0001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  13. 13HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide produced greater decreases in postprandial glucagon than liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, after-meal glucagon fell more with lixisenatide than with liraglutide.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedPostprandial glucagon
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide provided greater decreases in postprandial glucagon (p < 0.05), insulin (p < 0.0001) and C-peptide (p < 0.0001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  14. 14HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide produced greater decreases in postprandial insulin than liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, lixisenatide lowered after-meal insulin more than liraglutide did.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedPostprandial insulin
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide provided greater decreases in postprandial glucagon (p < 0.05), insulin (p < 0.0001) and C-peptide (p < 0.0001).
  15. 15HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, postprandial C-peptide increased with liraglutide, whereas lixisenatide decreased it.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, after-meal C-peptide rose with liraglutide but fell with lixisenatide.

    Outcome
    IncreasePostprandial C-peptide
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    decreases in postprandial insulin, C-peptide (vs. an increase with liraglutide)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Lixisenatide provided greater decreases in postprandial glucagon (p < 0.05), insulin (p < 0.0001) and C-peptide (p < 0.0001).
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  16. 16HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, mean HbA1c decreased with liraglutide, from 7.4% to 6.9%, as it did with lixisenatide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c fell with liraglutide, and it also fell with lixisenatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c baseline
    7.4%
    liraglutide
    HbA1c end
    6.9%
    liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Mean HbA1c decreased in both treatment groups (from 7.2% to 6.9% with lixisenatide vs. 7.4% to 6.9% with liraglutide) as did body weight (-1.6 kg vs. -2.4 kg, respectively).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  17. 17HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, body weight decreased with liraglutide (-2.4 kg), as it did with lixisenatide (-1.6 kg).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, body weight fell with liraglutide, and it also fell with lixisenatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBody weight change
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Body weight change
    −2.4 kg
    liraglutide
    Body weight change
    −1.6 kg
    lixisenatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Mean HbA1c decreased in both treatment groups (from 7.2% to 6.9% with lixisenatide vs. 7.4% to 6.9% with liraglutide) as did body weight (-1.6 kg vs. -2.4 kg, respectively).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  18. 18HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, 65% of liraglutide patients had adverse events, against 55% with lixisenatide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, 65% had side effects with liraglutide and 55% with lixisenatide.

    Outcome
    Not applicableOverall incidence of adverse events
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Adverse event incidence
    65%
    liraglutide
    Adverse event incidence
    55%
    lixisenatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Overall incidence of adverse events was lower with lixisenatide (55%) versus liraglutide (65%)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  19. 19HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, no serious adverse events were reported.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, no serious side effects were reported.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSerious adverse events
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    with no serious events or hypoglycaemia reported.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  20. 20HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, no hypoglycaemia was reported.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, no low blood sugar events were reported.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHypoglycaemia
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    with no serious events or hypoglycaemia reported.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  21. 21HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, lixisenatide had better gastrointestinal tolerability than liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, lixisenatide was easier on the stomach and gut than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    Not applicableGastrointestinal tolerability
    Study

    n = 71

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and better gastrointestinal tolerability than liraglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  22. 22HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, HbA1c decreased from 7.2% to 6.9% with lixisenatide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, HbA1c decreased during lixisenatide treatment compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change
    Study

    n = 77

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean HbA1c
    7.2%
    lixisenatide, before treatment
    Mean HbA1c
    6.9%
    lixisenatide, after treatment

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Mean HbA1c decreased in both treatment groups (from 7.2% to 6.9% with lixisenatide vs. 7.4% to 6.9% with liraglutide) as did body weight (-1.6 kg vs. -2.4 kg, respectively).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  23. 23HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, mean body weight changed by -1.6 kg with lixisenatide and by -2.4 kg with liraglutide; no between-group comparison was reported for this outcome.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, weight went down by 1.6 kg with lixisenatide; weight also went down with liraglutide, by 2.4 kg.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBody weight change
    Study

    n = 77

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Body weight change
    −1.6 kg
    lixisenatide
    Body weight change
    −2.4 kg
    liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Mean HbA1c decreased in both treatment groups (from 7.2% to 6.9% with lixisenatide vs. 7.4% to 6.9% with liraglutide) as did body weight (-1.6 kg vs. -2.4 kg, respectively).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  24. 24HumanNon-randomized trialSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, no serious adverse events were reported with lixisenatide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, no serious adverse events were reported during lixisenatide treatment.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSerious adverse events
    Study

    n = 77

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Overall incidence of adverse events was lower with lixisenatide (55%) versus liraglutide (65%), with no serious events or hypoglycaemia reported.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.
  25. 25HumanNon-randomized trialSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, no hypoglycaemia was reported with lixisenatide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes on metformin, no low blood sugar events were reported during lixisenatide treatment.

    Outcome
    Not applicableHypoglycaemia
    Study

    n = 77

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg once daily weeks 1-2, then 20 µg once daily · subcutaneous · 28 daysAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Overall incidence of adverse events was lower with lixisenatide (55%) versus liraglutide (65%), with no serious events or hypoglycaemia reported.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In this 28-day, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study (NCT01175473), patients (mean HbA1c 7.3%) received subcutaneous lixisenatide QD (10 µg weeks 1-2, then 20 µg; n = 77) or liraglutide QD (0.6 mg week 1, 1.2 mg week 2, then 1.8 mg; n = 71) 30 min before breakfast.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 2Results postedNCT01175473

Effects of Lixisenatide Compared to Liraglutide on the Postprandial Plasma Glucose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Sanofin = 148Aug 2010 to Nov 2010

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 28 Nov 2016

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 4Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 3

    27 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 2

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  4. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.