Skip to content

Study · In silico · 2012

3 results

Long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with liraglutide versus sitagliptin therapy when added to metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a CORE Diabetes Model analysis.

Lee WC, Samyshkin Y, Langer J, Palmer JL

Journal of medical economics13 Aug 2012Cited by 22 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study3

3 results from studies that gave the peptide. No result from this study comes from people.

  1. 01Computer modelIn silicoOther

    In a simulation of adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide 1.8 mg added to metformin cost $37,234 per QALY gained versus sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model, liraglutide 1.8 mg cost $37,234 for each extra healthy year gained compared with sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    Not applicableICER, liraglutide 1.8 mg versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IMS CORE Diabetes Model, 35-year simulation
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin 100 mg daily
    Outcome group
    Healthcare costs and utilization · Whole body
    Studied dose
    1.8 mg daily · 5 yearsAs given in this study.

    Measurements

    ICER
    37.234 $ per QALY
    liraglutide 1.8 mg vs sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    For liraglutide 1.8 mg vs sitagliptin, the ICER was $37,234 per QALY gained
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The IMS CORE Diabetes Model (CDM), a non-product-specific, validated computer simulation model that projects the long-term outcomes related to interventions for type 2 diabetes, is used for simulation of these interventions.
    Summary · context
    In the model, patients were treated initially on one of the three treatment options: liraglutide 1.2 mg daily, 1.8 mg daily, or sitagliptin 100 mg daily, each used as add-on therapy to metformin for 5 years.
  2. 02Computer modelIn silicoOther

    In a simulation of adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide 1.2 mg added to metformin cost $25,742 per QALY gained versus sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model, liraglutide 1.2 mg cost $25,742 for each extra healthy year gained compared with sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    Not applicableICER, liraglutide 1.2 mg versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IMS CORE Diabetes Model, 35-year simulation
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin 100 mg daily
    Outcome group
    Healthcare costs and utilization · Whole body
    Studied dose
    1.2 mg daily · 5 yearsAs given in this study.

    Measurements

    ICER
    25.742 $ per QALY
    liraglutide 1.2 mg vs sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    while for liraglutide 1.2 mg vs sitagliptin, the ICER was $25,742 per QALY gained.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The IMS CORE Diabetes Model (CDM), a non-product-specific, validated computer simulation model that projects the long-term outcomes related to interventions for type 2 diabetes, is used for simulation of these interventions.
    Summary · context
    In the model, patients were treated initially on one of the three treatment options: liraglutide 1.2 mg daily, 1.8 mg daily, or sitagliptin 100 mg daily, each used as add-on therapy to metformin for 5 years.
  3. 03Computer modelIn silicoOther

    In sensitivity analyses of the simulation, the ICERs for liraglutide versus sitagliptin stayed below US$ 50,000/QALY, except for the shortest time horizon of 10 years.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model, liraglutide stayed below the common US cost threshold in all checks except the shortest 10-year view.

    Outcome
    Not applicableICER in sensitivity analyses
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IMS CORE Diabetes Model, 35-year simulation
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin 100 mg daily
    Outcome group
    Healthcare costs and utilization · Whole body
    Studied dose
    1.2 mg and 1.8 mg daily · 5 yearsAs given in this study.

    Measurements

    ICER threshold in sensitivity analyses
    < 50 US$/QALY
    sensitivity analyses, except 10-year horizon

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In all sensitivity analyses, including setting the change in HbA1c to the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals, the ICERs remained below US$ 50,000/QALY, a commonly accepted threshold in the US, except for the shortest time horizon of 10 years.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The IMS CORE Diabetes Model (CDM), a non-product-specific, validated computer simulation model that projects the long-term outcomes related to interventions for type 2 diabetes, is used for simulation of these interventions.
    Summary · context
    In the model, patients were treated initially on one of the three treatment options: liraglutide 1.2 mg daily, 1.8 mg daily, or sitagliptin 100 mg daily, each used as add-on therapy to metformin for 5 years.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT00700817

The Effect of Liraglutide Compared to Sitagliptin, Both in Combination With Metformin on Glycaemic Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 665Jun 2008 to Jun 2010

Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.