Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · n = 8 · 2012

3 results

Effect of pramlintide on prandial glycemic excursions during closed-loop control in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes.

Weinzimer SA, Sherr JL, Cengiz E, Kim G, Ruiz JL, Carria L, Voskanyan G, Roy A, Tamborlane WV

Diabetes care18 Jul 2012Cited by 99 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study3

3 results from studies that gave the peptide. 3 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In adolescents and young adults with T1DM, pramlintide delayed peak blood glucose compared with closed-loop insulin alone.

    In plain wordsIn adolescents and young adults with T1DM, pramlintide delayed peak blood glucose compared with closed-loop insulin alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseTime to peak blood glucose
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Closed-loop insulin delivery alone
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    30 μg before meals · injection · 24 hAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Time to peak glucose
    2.5 h
    pramlintide
    Time to peak glucose
    1.5 h
    closed-loop alone

    Source sentences

    Summary
    CLP was associated with overall delayed time to peak BG (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 h; P < 0.0001) and reduced magnitude of glycemic excursion (88 ± 42 vs. 113 ± 32 mg/dL; P = 0.006) compared with CL alone.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Eight subjects (4 female; age, 15-28 years; A1C, 7.5 ± 0.7%) were studied for 48 h on a CL insulin-delivery system with a proportional integral derivative algorithm with insulin feedback: 24 h on CL control alone (CL) and 24 h on CL control plus 30-μg premeal injections of pramlintide (CLP).
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In adolescents and young adults with T1DM, pramlintide reduced glucose excursions compared with closed-loop insulin alone.

    In plain wordsIn adolescents and young adults with T1DM, pramlintide reduced glucose excursions compared with closed-loop insulin alone.

    Outcome
    DecreaseGlycemic excursion magnitude
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Closed-loop insulin delivery alone
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    30 μg before meals · injection · 24 hAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Glycemic excursion
    88 mg/dL
    pramlintide
    Glycemic excursion
    113 mg/dL
    closed-loop alone

    Source sentences

    Summary
    CLP was associated with overall delayed time to peak BG (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 h; P < 0.0001) and reduced magnitude of glycemic excursion (88 ± 42 vs. 113 ± 32 mg/dL; P = 0.006) compared with CL alone.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Eight subjects (4 female; age, 15-28 years; A1C, 7.5 ± 0.7%) were studied for 48 h on a CL insulin-delivery system with a proportional integral derivative algorithm with insulin feedback: 24 h on CL control alone (CL) and 24 h on CL control plus 30-μg premeal injections of pramlintide (CLP).
  3. 03HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In adolescents and young adults with T1DM, pramlintide reduced glucose excursions particularly at lunch and dinner, with higher premeal insulin concentrations.

    In plain wordsIn adolescents and young adults with T1DM, pramlintide reduced glucose excursions particularly at lunch and dinner, with higher premeal insulin concentrations.

    Outcome
    DecreaseLunch and dinner glycemic excursions
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Closed-loop insulin delivery alone
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    30 μg before meals · injection · 24 hAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Pramlintide effects on glycemic excursions were particularly evident at lunch and dinner, in association with higher premeal insulin concentrations at those mealtimes.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Eight subjects (4 female; age, 15-28 years; A1C, 7.5 ± 0.7%) were studied for 48 h on a CL insulin-delivery system with a proportional integral derivative algorithm with insulin feedback: 24 h on CL control alone (CL) and 24 h on CL control plus 30-μg premeal injections of pramlintide (CLP).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.