In patients with diabetes, SWITCH did not demonstrate HbA1c non-inferiority to ADD.
In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, switching from sitagliptin to exenatide did not establish non-inferiority to adding exenatide to sitagliptin.
- Peptide
- Exenatide (exendin-4)
- Outcome
- Not applicableHbA1c non-inferiority
- Study
n = 255
- Comparator
- ADD: exenatide plus sitagliptin and metformin
- Outcome group
- Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
Measurements
- Between-treatment HbA1c difference
- 0.3%
- SWITCH versus ADD, week 20
- Between-treatment HbA1c difference
- 3 mmol/mol
- SWITCH versus ADD, week 20
Source sentences
Non-inferiority (0.4% margin) of SWITCH to ADD treatment, measured by change in HbA(1c) from baseline to week 20, was not shown {between-treatment difference in least-squares mean [95% CI 3 mmol/mol (0.30%)] [0.8-5.8 (0.07-0.53)]}.
1 context sentence(design, population, supporting numbers)
Patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with sitagliptin plus metformin were randomly assigned to 20 weeks of treatment with twice-daily exenatide plus placebo and metformin (SWITCH, n = 127) or twice-daily exenatide plus sitagliptin and metformin (ADD, n = 128).
In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).