Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 248 · 2012

10 results

Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study.

Russell-Jones D, Cuddihy RM, Hanefeld M, Kumar A, González JG, Chan M, Wolka AM, Boardman MK

Diabetes care30 Dec 2011Cited by 273 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study10

10 results from studies that gave the peptide. 10 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with diabetes, nausea occurred in 11.3% with exenatide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, nausea occurred in 11.3% with exenatide.

    Outcome
    Not applicableNausea
    Study

    n = 248

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Nausea incidence
    11.3%
    exenatide once weekly arm

    Source sentences

    Summary
    EQW, nausea (11.3%) and diarrhea (10.9%);
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with diabetes, diarrhea occurred in 10.9% with exenatide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, diarrhea occurred in 10.9% with exenatide.

    Outcome
    Not applicableDiarrhea
    Study

    n = 248

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Diarrhea incidence
    10.9%
    exenatide once weekly arm

    Source sentences

    Summary
    EQW, nausea (11.3%) and diarrhea (10.9%);
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In drug-naive patients with diabetes, HbA1c reductions with exenatide and metformin did not differ significantly.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, exenatide and metformin produced similar HbA1c reductions.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHbA1c versus metformin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Metformin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c reduction
    −1.53%
    exenatide once weekly, 26 weeks (LS mean)
    HbA1c reduction
    −1.48%
    metformin, 26 weeks (LS mean)

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HbA(1c) reductions (%) at 26 weeks (least-squares means) with EQW versus MET, PIO, and SITA were -1.53 vs. -1.48 (P = 0.620), -1.63 (P = 0.328), and -1.15 (P < 0.001), respectively.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In drug-naive patients with diabetes, HbA1c reductions with exenatide and pioglitazone did not differ significantly.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, HbA1c reductions did not differ significantly between exenatide and pioglitazone.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHbA1c versus pioglitazone
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Pioglitazone
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c reduction
    −1.53%
    exenatide once weekly, 26 weeks (LS mean)
    HbA1c reduction
    −1.63%
    pioglitazone, 26 weeks (LS mean)

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HbA(1c) reductions (%) at 26 weeks (least-squares means) with EQW versus MET, PIO, and SITA were -1.53 vs. -1.48 (P = 0.620), -1.63 (P = 0.328), and -1.15 (P < 0.001), respectively.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In drug-naive patients with diabetes, exenatide reduced HbA1c more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, exenatide reduced HbA1c more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c reduction
    −1.53%
    exenatide once weekly, 26 weeks (LS mean)
    HbA1c reduction
    −1.15%
    sitagliptin, 26 weeks (LS mean)

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HbA(1c) reductions (%) at 26 weeks (least-squares means) with EQW versus MET, PIO, and SITA were -1.53 vs. -1.48 (P = 0.620), -1.63 (P = 0.328), and -1.15 (P < 0.001), respectively.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with diabetes, weight changes with exenatide and metformin did not differ significantly.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, exenatide and metformin produced similar weight changes.

    Outcome
    No significant changeWeight versus metformin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Metformin
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Weight change
    −2 kg
    exenatide once weekly, 26 weeks
    Weight change
    −2 kg
    metformin, 26 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Weight changes (kg) were -2.0 vs. -2.0 (P = 0.892), +1.5 (P < 0.001), and -0.8 (P < 0.001), respectively.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with diabetes, exenatide reduced weight compared with pioglitazone.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, exenatide reduced weight compared with pioglitazone.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWeight versus pioglitazone
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Pioglitazone
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Weight change
    −2 kg
    exenatide once weekly, 26 weeks
    Weight change
    1.5 kg
    pioglitazone, 26 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Weight changes (kg) were -2.0 vs. -2.0 (P = 0.892), +1.5 (P < 0.001), and -0.8 (P < 0.001), respectively.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with diabetes, exenatide reduced weight more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, exenatide reduced weight more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWeight versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Weight change
    −2 kg
    exenatide once weekly, 26 weeks
    Weight change
    −0.8 kg
    sitagliptin, 26 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Weight changes (kg) were -2.0 vs. -2.0 (P = 0.892), +1.5 (P < 0.001), and -0.8 (P < 0.001), respectively.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In the diabetes trial including exenatide, confirmed minor hypoglycemia was rare.

    In plain wordsIn the diabetes trial including exenatide, confirmed minor hypoglycemia was rare.

    Outcome
    Not applicableMinor hypoglycemia
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Minor (confirmed) hypoglycemia was rarely reported.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In the diabetes trial including exenatide, no major hypoglycemia occurred.

    In plain wordsIn the diabetes trial including exenatide, no major hypoglycemia occurred.

    Outcome
    Not applicableMajor hypoglycemia
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.0 mg weekly · subcutaneous · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No major hypoglycemia occurred.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To test the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) compared with metformin (MET), pioglitazone (PIO), and sitagliptin (SITA) over 26 weeks, in suboptimally treated (diet and exercise) drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) EQW 2.0 mg + oral placebo (n = 248), MET 2,000 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 246), PIO 45 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163), or SITA 100 mg/day + SC placebo (n = 163) for 26 weeks.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials2

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 trials · 2 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 4NCT02380521

Exenatide Once Weekly, Cardiovascular Risk and Type-2 Diabetes

University of Palermon = 60Jan 2015 to Nov 2016

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT00676338

Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly Injection Versus Metformin, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, or Thiazolidinedione as Monotherapy in Drug-Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (DURATION-4)

AstraZenecan = 820Nov 2008 to Jan 2011

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.