Skip to content

Study · Measured the body's own peptide · 2011

1 result

Multiplexed molecular descriptors of pressure ulcers defined by imaging mass spectrometry.

Taverna D, Nanney LB, Pollins AC, Sindona G, Caprioli R

Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society19 Oct 2011Cited by 23 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Natural levels measured1

These results measure the body's own peptide. Nobody was given the peptide. They are not evidence about taking it. They are left out of key results, evidence counts and charts.

  1. 01HumanEndogenous levelObservational studyOther

    In pressure ulcer tissue, Tβ4 showed higher relative levels in adjacent dermis and maturing areas of the wound bed.

    In plain wordsIn tissue from pressure ulcers, the body's own thymosin beta‑4 was higher in surrounding skin and in healing areas of the wound.

    Outcome
    IncreaseRelative Tβ4 level in adjacent dermis and maturing wound bed areas
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Wound healing · Skin and wound

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Thymosin β4 appears to be a favorable protein marker showing higher relative levels in adjacent dermis and maturing areas of the wound bed.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We describe the results of a pilot study that applies matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry technology for direct tissue analysis to evaluate proteomic signatures ranging from 2 to 20 kDa and phospholipids from 300-1,200 Da in focal regions within the wound microenvironment.

    This result measures the body's own Thymosin beta-4 (human). Nobody was given the peptide. It is not evidence about taking it.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    13 Oct 2026, 01:52 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    12 Oct 2026, 18:17 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.