Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 86 · 2011

13 results

Effects of exenatide twice daily versus sitagliptin on 24-h glucose, glucoregulatory and hormonal measures: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.

Berg JK, Shenouda SK, Heilmann CR, Gray AL, Holcombe JH

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism1 Nov 2011Cited by 46 (Europe PMC)

Summary

AimTo compare exenatide and sitagliptin glucose and glucoregulatory measures in subjects with type 2 diabetes.MethodsAn 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study. Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks. Main outcome was time-averaged glucose during the 24-h inpatient visits.ResultsBoth treatments decreased average 24-h glucose, but exenatide had a greater effect [between-group difference: -0.67 mmol/l, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.9 to -0.4 mmol/l]. Both treatments decreased 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), area under the curve of glucose above 7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl) and 11 mmol/l (200 mg/dl) and increased the time spent with glucose between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/l (70 and 140 mg/dl) during 24 h, but exenatide had a significantly greater effect (p < 0.05). Both treatments decreased postprandial serum glucagon, with exenatide having a greater effect (p < 0.005). Both treatments decreased fasting blood glucose to a similar degree (p = 0.766). Sitagliptin increased, while exenatide decreased, postprandial intact glucagon-like peptide-1. Both drugs improved homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-B), with exenatide having a significantly greater effect (p = 0.005). Both exenatide and sitagliptin decreased 24-h caloric intake, with exenatide having a greater effect (p < 0.001). There was no episode of major hypoglycaemia. Adverse events were mild to moderate and mostly gastrointestinal in nature with exenatide. No study withdrawals were due to an adverse event.ConclusionCompared to sitagliptin, exenatide showed significantly lower average 24-h glucose, 2-h PPG, glucagon, caloric intake and improved HOMA-B.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study13

13 results from studies that gave the peptide. 13 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide lowered average daily glucose more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide lowered average daily glucose more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAverage 24-hour glucose
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Between-group glucose difference
    −0.67 mmol/l
    exenatide versus sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments decreased average 24-h glucose, but exenatide had a greater effect [between-group difference: -0.67 mmol/l, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.9 to -0.4 mmol/l].
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide lowered post-meal glucose more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide lowered post-meal glucose more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTwo-hour postprandial glucose
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments decreased 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), area under the curve of glucose above 7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl) and 11 mmol/l (200 mg/dl) and increased the time spent with glucose between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/l (70 and 140 mg/dl) during 24 h, but exenatide had a significantly greater effect (p < 0.05).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced glucose AUC above 7.8 mmol/l more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced exposure to glucose above 7.8 mmol/l more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseGlucose AUC above 7.8 mmol/l
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments decreased 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), area under the curve of glucose above 7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl) and 11 mmol/l (200 mg/dl) and increased the time spent with glucose between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/l (70 and 140 mg/dl) during 24 h, but exenatide had a significantly greater effect (p < 0.05).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced glucose AUC above 11 mmol/l more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced exposure to glucose above 11 mmol/l more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseGlucose AUC above 11 mmol/l
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments decreased 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), area under the curve of glucose above 7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl) and 11 mmol/l (200 mg/dl) and increased the time spent with glucose between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/l (70 and 140 mg/dl) during 24 h, but exenatide had a significantly greater effect (p < 0.05).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide increased time with glucose between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/l more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide increased time within the reported glucose range more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseTime in glucose range
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments decreased 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), area under the curve of glucose above 7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl) and 11 mmol/l (200 mg/dl) and increased the time spent with glucose between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/l (70 and 140 mg/dl) during 24 h, but exenatide had a significantly greater effect (p < 0.05).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide lowered postprandial glucagon more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide lowered post-meal glucagon more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    DecreasePostprandial glucagon
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments decreased postprandial serum glucagon, with exenatide having a greater effect (p < 0.005).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide and sitagliptin reduced fasting glucose similarly.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide and sitagliptin reduced fasting glucose similarly.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFasting blood glucose
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments decreased fasting blood glucose to a similar degree (p = 0.766).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide decreased postprandial intact GLP-1, whereas sitagliptin increased it.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide decreased post-meal intact GLP-1, whereas sitagliptin increased it.

    Outcome
    DecreasePostprandial intact GLP-1
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Sitagliptin increased, while exenatide decreased, postprandial intact glucagon-like peptide-1.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide improved HOMA-B more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide improved the reported beta-cell function measure more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseHOMA-B
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both drugs improved homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-B), with exenatide having a significantly greater effect (p = 0.005).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced daily caloric intake more than sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced daily calorie intake more than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseDaily caloric intake
    Study

    n = 86

    Comparator
    sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both exenatide and sitagliptin decreased 24-h caloric intake, with exenatide having a greater effect (p < 0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  11. 11HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In the crossover diabetes study, no major hypoglycaemia occurred.

    In plain wordsIn the crossover diabetes study, no major low blood sugar episode occurred.

    Outcome
    Not applicableMajor hypoglycaemia
    Study

    n = 86

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was no episode of major hypoglycaemia.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  12. 12HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, adverse events with exenatide were mild to moderate and mostly gastrointestinal.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, side effects with exenatide were mild to moderate and mostly affected digestion.

    Outcome
    Not applicableAdverse event severity
    Study

    n = 86

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Adverse events were mild to moderate and mostly gastrointestinal in nature with exenatide.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.
  13. 13HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In the crossover diabetes study, no participant withdrew because of an adverse event.

    In plain wordsIn the crossover diabetes study, no participant withdrew because of a side effect.

    Outcome
    Not applicableAdverse-event withdrawals
    Study

    n = 86

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    10 µg twice daily · subcutaneous · 4 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No study withdrawals were due to an adverse event.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, crossover, single-centre study.
    Summary · context
    Eighty-six subjects (58% female, body mass index 35 ± 5 kg/m², haemoglobin A1c 8.3 ± 1.0%) received either exenatide 10 µg (subcutaneous) twice daily or sitagliptin 100 mg (oral) daily for 4 weeks and crossed to the other therapy for an additional 4 weeks.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.