Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · n = 31 · 2009

5 results

Results of a second year of therapy with the 12-month histrelin implant for the treatment of central precocious puberty.

Rahhal S, Clarke WL, Kletter GB, Lee PA, Neely EK, Reiter EO, Saenger P, Shulman D, Silverman L, Eugster EA

International journal of pediatric endocrinology26 Feb 2009Cited by 29 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study5

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 5 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In children receiving histrelin, predicted adult height increased by 5.1 cm at 24 months (P = .0001).

    In plain wordsIn children receiving histrelin, predicted adult height increased by 5.1 cm.

    Peptide
    Histrelin
    Outcome
    IncreasePredicted adult height
    Study

    n = 31

    Outcome group
    Linear growth · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous implantAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Predicted adult height increase at 24 months
    5.1 cm
    children receiving a second implant

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Predicted adult height increased by 5.1 cm at 24 months (P = .0001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The study evaluates a second year of therapy in children with CPP who received a new implant after one year of treatment.
    Summary · context
    A prospective one-year study following an initial 12-month treatment period was conducted.
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialSafety outcome

    Minor implant site reactions occurred in 61% of children receiving a second histrelin implant.

    In plain wordsMinor implant site reactions occurred in 61% of children receiving histrelin.

    Peptide
    Histrelin
    Outcome
    Not applicableMinor implant site reactions
    Study

    n = 31

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous implantAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Subjects with minor implant site reactions
    61%
    subjects receiving a second implant

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Minor implant site reactions occurred in 61%, while minor difficulties with explantation occurred in 32.2% of subjects.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The study evaluates a second year of therapy in children with CPP who received a new implant after one year of treatment.
    Summary · context
    A prospective one-year study following an initial 12-month treatment period was conducted.
  3. 03HumanNon-randomized trialSafety outcome

    Minor explantation difficulties occurred in 32.2% of children receiving histrelin.

    In plain wordsMinor removal difficulties occurred in 32.2% of children receiving histrelin.

    Peptide
    Histrelin
    Outcome
    Not applicableMinor explantation difficulties
    Study

    n = 31

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous implantAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Subjects with minor difficulties with explantation
    32.2%
    subjects receiving a second implant

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Minor implant site reactions occurred in 61%, while minor difficulties with explantation occurred in 32.2% of subjects.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The study evaluates a second year of therapy in children with CPP who received a new implant after one year of treatment.
    Summary · context
    A prospective one-year study following an initial 12-month treatment period was conducted.
  4. 04HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In treatment-naïve children receiving a second histrelin implant, peak LH declined from 0.92 to 0.51 mIU/mL between 12 and 24 months (P < .0001).

    In plain wordsIn treatment-naïve children, peak LH decreased during the second year of histrelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Histrelin
    Outcome
    DecreasePeak LH in treatment-naïve subjects
    Study

    n = 18

    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous implantAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Peak LH at 12 months (mean, SD 0.58)
    0.92 mIU/mL
    naive subjects
    Peak LH at 24 months (mean, SD 0.33)
    0.51 mIU/mL
    naive subjects

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Peak LH declined from 0.92 +/- 0.58 mIU/mL at 12 months to 0.51 +/- 0.33 mIU/mL at 24 months (P < .0001) in naïve subjects,
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The study evaluates a second year of therapy in children with CPP who received a new implant after one year of treatment.
    Summary · context
    A prospective one-year study following an initial 12-month treatment period was conducted.
  5. 05HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In previously treated children receiving histrelin, peak LH declined from 0.74 to 0.45 mIU/mL between 12 and 24 months (P = .0081).

    In plain wordsIn previously treated children, peak LH decreased during the second year of histrelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Histrelin
    Outcome
    DecreasePeak LH in previously treated subjects
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous implantAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Peak LH at 12 months (mean, SD 0.50)
    0.74 mIU/mL
    previously treated subjects
    Peak LH at 24 months (mean, SD 0.35)
    0.45 mIU/mL
    previously treated subjects

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and from 0.74 +/- 0.50 mIU/mL at 12 months to 0.45 +/- 0.35 mIU/mL at 24 months (P = .0081) in previously treated subjects.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The study evaluates a second year of therapy in children with CPP who received a new implant after one year of treatment.
    Summary · context
    A prospective one-year study following an initial 12-month treatment period was conducted.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

Publication types

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.