Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 113 · 2009

8 results

Randomized comparison of pramlintide or mealtime insulin added to basal insulin treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Riddle M, Pencek R, Charenkavanich S, Lutz K, Wilhelm K, Porter L

Diabetes care5 Jun 2009Cited by 41 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study8

8 results from studies that gave the peptide. 8 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, more pramlintide patients achieved A1C <=7.0% without weight gain or severe hypoglycemia than rapid-acting insulin patients.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, more pramlintide patients reached A1C <=7.0% without weight gain or severe hypoglycemia than rapid-acting insulin patients.

    Outcome
    IncreaseA1C target without weight gain or severe hypoglycemia
    Study

    n = 113

    Comparator
    Rapid-acting insulin analog
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    120 microg · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite target achievement
    30%
    pramlintide
    Composite target achievement
    11%
    rapid-acting insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    More pramlintide- than RAIA-treated patients achieved the primary end point (30 vs. 11%, P = 0.018) with a similar dose of basal insulin.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The proportion of patients achieving A1C < or =7.0% without weight gain or severe hypoglycemia at week 24 was the primary end point.
    Summary · context
    In a 24-week open-label, multicenter study, 113 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to addition of mealtime pramlintide (120 microg) or a titrated RAIA to basal insulin and prior oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, basal insulin doses were similar with pramlintide and rapid-acting insulin.

    In plain wordsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, basal insulin doses were similar with pramlintide and rapid-acting insulin.

    Outcome
    No significant changeBasal insulin dose
    Study

    n = 113

    Comparator
    Rapid-acting insulin analog
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    120 microg · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    More pramlintide- than RAIA-treated patients achieved the primary end point (30 vs. 11%, P = 0.018) with a similar dose of basal insulin.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In a 24-week open-label, multicenter study, 113 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to addition of mealtime pramlintide (120 microg) or a titrated RAIA to basal insulin and prior oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose levels and reductions were similar with pramlintide and rapid-acting insulin.

    In plain wordsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose and its reduction were similar with pramlintide and rapid-acting insulin.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFasting plasma glucose
    Study

    n = 113

    Comparator
    Rapid-acting insulin analog
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    120 microg · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    FPG
    122 mg/dl
    pramlintide at 24 weeks
    FPG
    123 mg/dl
    rapid-acting insulin at 24 weeks
    FPG change
    −31 mg/dl
    pramlintide
    FPG change
    −34 mg/dl
    rapid-acting insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Pramlintide and an RAIA yielded similar mean +/- SEM values for FPG and A1C at 24 weeks (122 +/- 7 vs. 123 +/- 5 mg/dl and 7.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.0 +/- 0.1%, respectively) and similar least squares mean reductions from baseline to end point (-31 +/- 6 vs. -34 +/- 6 mg/dl and -1.1 +/- 0.2 vs. -1.3 +/- 0.2%, respectively).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In a 24-week open-label, multicenter study, 113 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to addition of mealtime pramlintide (120 microg) or a titrated RAIA to basal insulin and prior oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, A1C levels and reductions were similar with pramlintide and rapid-acting insulin.

    In plain wordsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, A1C and its reduction were similar with pramlintide and rapid-acting insulin.

    Outcome
    No significant changeA1C
    Study

    n = 113

    Comparator
    Rapid-acting insulin analog
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    120 microg · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    A1C
    7.2%
    pramlintide at 24 weeks
    A1C
    7%
    rapid-acting insulin at 24 weeks
    A1C change
    −1.1%
    pramlintide
    A1C change
    −1.3%
    rapid-acting insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Pramlintide and an RAIA yielded similar mean +/- SEM values for FPG and A1C at 24 weeks (122 +/- 7 vs. 123 +/- 5 mg/dl and 7.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 7.0 +/- 0.1%, respectively) and similar least squares mean reductions from baseline to end point (-31 +/- 6 vs. -34 +/- 6 mg/dl and -1.1 +/- 0.2 vs. -1.3 +/- 0.2%, respectively).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In a 24-week open-label, multicenter study, 113 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to addition of mealtime pramlintide (120 microg) or a titrated RAIA to basal insulin and prior oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, weight change was +0.0 kg with pramlintide versus +4.7 kg with rapid-acting insulin analogs.

    In plain wordsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, weight stayed stable with pramlintide but increased with rapid-acting insulin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWeight gain
    Study

    n = 113

    Comparator
    Rapid-acting insulin analog
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    120 microg · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Weight change
    0 kg
    pramlintide
    Weight change
    4.7 kg
    rapid-acting insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    RAIAs but not pramlintide caused weight gain (+4.7 +/- 0.7 vs. +0.0 +/- 0.7 kg, P < 0.0001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In a 24-week open-label, multicenter study, 113 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to addition of mealtime pramlintide (120 microg) or a titrated RAIA to basal insulin and prior oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, mild to moderate hypoglycemia was less frequent with pramlintide than rapid-acting insulin.

    In plain wordsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, mild to moderate low blood sugar was less frequent with pramlintide than rapid-acting insulin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMild to moderate hypoglycemia
    Study

    n = 113

    Comparator
    Rapid-acting insulin analog
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    120 microg · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Hypoglycemia
    55%
    pramlintide
    Hypoglycemia
    82%
    rapid-acting insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Fewer patients reported mild to moderate hypoglycemia with pramlintide than with the RAIA (55 vs. 82%), but more patients reported nausea (21 vs. 0%).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In a 24-week open-label, multicenter study, 113 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to addition of mealtime pramlintide (120 microg) or a titrated RAIA to basal insulin and prior oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, nausea was more frequent with pramlintide than rapid-acting insulin.

    In plain wordsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, nausea was more frequent with pramlintide than rapid-acting insulin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNausea
    Study

    n = 113

    Comparator
    Rapid-acting insulin analog
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    120 microg · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Nausea
    21%
    pramlintide
    Nausea
    0%
    rapid-acting insulin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Fewer patients reported mild to moderate hypoglycemia with pramlintide than with the RAIA (55 vs. 82%), but more patients reported nausea (21 vs. 0%).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In a 24-week open-label, multicenter study, 113 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to addition of mealtime pramlintide (120 microg) or a titrated RAIA to basal insulin and prior oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, no severe hypoglycemia occurred with pramlintide or rapid-acting insulin.

    In plain wordsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, no severe low blood sugar occurred with pramlintide or rapid-acting insulin.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSevere hypoglycemia
    Study

    n = 113

    Comparator
    Rapid-acting insulin analog
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    120 microg · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No severe hypoglycemia occurred in either group.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In a 24-week open-label, multicenter study, 113 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to addition of mealtime pramlintide (120 microg) or a titrated RAIA to basal insulin and prior oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.