Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 377 · 2008

9 results

Efficacy and safety of exenatide administered before the two largest daily meals of Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes.

Forti A, Garcia EG, Yu MB, Jimenez MC, Brodows RG, Oliveira JH

Current medical research and opinion24 Jul 2008Cited by 14 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study9

9 results from studies that gave the peptide. 9 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide before breakfast and dinner was non-inferior to lunch and dinner for HbA1c reduction.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide before breakfast and dinner met the non-inferiority criterion versus lunch and dinner for A1c reduction.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHbA1c non-inferiority by meal timing
    Study

    n = 377

    Comparator
    Exenatide before lunch and dinner
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5-mug for 4 weeks, then 10-microg for 8 weeks · 4 weeks, then 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c difference
    0.14%
    lunch/dinner minus breakfast/dinner
    95% CI lower
    −0.04%
    difference
    95% CI upper
    0.32%
    difference

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HbA(1c) reduction with exenatide administration before BD was non-inferior to administration before LD (mean difference between (LD-BD) treatments: 0.14%; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.32%, p=0.120).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks).
    Summary · context
    Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide before breakfast and dinner significantly reduced HbA1c from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide before breakfast and dinner reduced A1c compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change before breakfast and dinner
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5-mug for 4 weeks, then 10-microg for 8 weeks · 4 weeks, then 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c change
    −1.2%
    breakfast/dinner

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments resulted in statistically significant HbA(1c) reductions at endpoint (BD -1.2% and LD -1.1%, respectively, p<0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks).
    Summary · context
    Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide before lunch and dinner significantly reduced HbA1c from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide before lunch and dinner reduced A1c compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change before lunch and dinner
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5-mug for 4 weeks, then 10-microg for 8 weeks · 4 weeks, then 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c change
    −1.1%
    lunch/dinner

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments resulted in statistically significant HbA(1c) reductions at endpoint (BD -1.2% and LD -1.1%, respectively, p<0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks).
    Summary · context
    Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes, fasting serum glucose change did not differ significantly between exenatide meal-timing arms.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, fasting glucose changes did not differ significantly between the two exenatide meal schedules.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFasting serum glucose change
    Study

    n = 377

    Comparator
    Exenatide before lunch and dinner
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5-mug for 4 weeks, then 10-microg for 8 weeks · 4 weeks, then 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    FSG change difference
    0.5 mmol/L
    meal-timing arms

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At endpoint, there were no statistical significant differences between the BD and LD arms in mean change in FSG (0.50 mmol/L; CI -0.02 to 1.02 mmol/L, p=0.058) and daily mean change in SMBG (0.19 mmol/L; CI -0.17 to 0.54 mmol/L, p=0.295).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks).
    Summary · context
    Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes, daily mean SMBG change did not differ significantly between exenatide meal-timing arms.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, average daily self-measured glucose changes did not differ significantly between the two exenatide meal schedules.

    Outcome
    No significant changeDaily mean SMBG change
    Study

    n = 377

    Comparator
    Exenatide before lunch and dinner
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5-mug for 4 weeks, then 10-microg for 8 weeks · 4 weeks, then 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    SMBG change difference
    0.19 mmol/L
    meal-timing arms

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At endpoint, there were no statistical significant differences between the BD and LD arms in mean change in FSG (0.50 mmol/L; CI -0.02 to 1.02 mmol/L, p=0.058) and daily mean change in SMBG (0.19 mmol/L; CI -0.17 to 0.54 mmol/L, p=0.295).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks).
    Summary · context
    Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes, symptomatic hypoglycemia rates were similar between exenatide meal-timing arms.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, symptomatic hypoglycemia rates were similar between the two exenatide meal schedules.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSymptomatic hypoglycemia rate
    Study

    n = 377

    Comparator
    Exenatide before lunch and dinner
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5-mug for 4 weeks, then 10-microg for 8 weeks · 4 weeks, then 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Symptomatic hypoglycemia
    5.2 events/patient-year
    breakfast/dinner
    Symptomatic hypoglycemia
    6.1 events/patient-year
    lunch/dinner

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia (5.2 events/patient-year vs. 6.1 events/patient-year) and nausea (23% vs. 25%), were similar between the BD and LD arms, respectively.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks).
    Summary · context
    Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes, nausea rates were similar between exenatide meal-timing arms.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, nausea rates were similar between the two exenatide meal schedules.

    Outcome
    No significant changeNausea rate
    Study

    n = 377

    Comparator
    Exenatide before lunch and dinner
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    5-mug for 4 weeks, then 10-microg for 8 weeks · 4 weeks, then 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Nausea
    23%
    breakfast/dinner
    Nausea
    25%
    lunch/dinner

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia (5.2 events/patient-year vs. 6.1 events/patient-year) and nausea (23% vs. 25%), were similar between the BD and LD arms, respectively.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks).
    Summary · context
    Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Brazilian patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide meal-timing arms met the non-inferiority criteria for HbA1c reduction.

    In plain wordsIn Brazilian people with diabetes, the exenatide meal schedules met the non-inferiority criteria for A1c reduction.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHbA1c non-inferiority in Brazil
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Exenatide before lunch and dinner
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5-mug for 4 weeks, then 10-microg for 8 weeks · 4 weeks, then 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c difference
    −0.12%
    Brazil
    CI lower
    −0.37%
    Brazil
    CI upper
    0.13%
    Brazil

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In Brazil, the non-inferiority criteria were met for HbA(1c) reduction between treatment arms (-0.12%; CI -0.37 to 0.13%, p=0.344),
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks).
    Summary · context
    Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c reduction favored exenatide before breakfast and dinner over lunch and dinner.

    In plain wordsIn Mexican people with diabetes, exenatide before breakfast and dinner reduced A1c more than lunch and dinner.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c timing difference in Mexico
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Exenatide before lunch and dinner
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5-mug for 4 weeks, then 10-microg for 8 weeks · 4 weeks, then 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c difference
    0.41%
    Mexico
    CI lower
    0.16%
    Mexico
    CI upper
    0.66%
    Mexico

    Source sentences

    Summary
    whereas in Mexico, there was a difference favoring exenatide administration before BD (0.41%; CI 0.16 to 0.66%, p=0.002).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this open-label, 2-arm study, patients taking metformin, sulfonylureas, and/or thiazolidinediones were randomized to exenatide before BD or before LD (5-mug exenatide for 4 weeks, then 10-microg exenatide for 8 weeks).
    Summary · context
    Patients were eligible for study inclusion if they consumed <15% of their total caloric intake at breakfast.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3NCT00359879

Comparison of Exenatide Taken Before Lunch and Dinner With Before Breakfast and Dinner in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

AstraZenecan = 377Sept 2006 to Jul 2007

Type 2 Diabetes

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 23 Feb 2015

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.