Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · n = 12 · 2008

11 results

Mechanism of action of exenatide to reduce postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes.

Cervera A, Wajcberg E, Sriwijitkamol A, Fernandez M, Zuo P, Triplitt C, Musi N, DeFronzo RA, Cersosimo E

American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism11 Mar 2008Cited by 118 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study11

6 results from studies that gave the peptide. 6 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, intravenous exenatide reduced post-meal hyperglycemia versus saline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, intravenous exenatide lowered post-meal blood sugar compared with saline.

    Outcome
    DecreasePost-meal hyperglycemia
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Intravenous saline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · intravenous · 6 h post mealAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Plasma glucose
    138 mg/dl
    exenatide
    Plasma glucose
    206 mg/dl
    saline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Post-meal hyperglycemia was markedly reduced (P < 0.01) in EXE (138 +/- 16 mg/dl) and in E+G (165 +/- 12) compared with CON (206 +/- 15).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, exenatide decreased plasma glucagon by approximately 20% from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide reduced plasma glucagon compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    DecreasePlasma glucagon
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · intravenous · 6 h post mealAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Glucagon reduction
    ≈ 20%
    exenatide
    Plasma glucagon
    73 pg/ml
    exenatide
    Plasma glucagon
    ≈ 90 pg/ml
    baseline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Baseline plasma glucagon ( approximately 90 pg/ml) decreased by approximately 20% to 73 +/- 4 pg/ml in EXE (P < 0.01) and was not different from CON in E+G (81 +/- 2).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).
  3. 03HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, exenatide suppressed endogenous glucose production more than saline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide suppressed the body's glucose production more than saline.

    Outcome
    DecreaseEndogenous glucose production
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Intravenous saline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · intravenous · 6 h post mealAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Suppression
    54%
    exenatide
    Suppression
    26%
    saline
    Endogenous glucose production before
    231 mg/min
    exenatide
    Endogenous glucose production after
    108 mg/min
    exenatide
    Endogenous glucose production before
    254 mg/min
    saline
    Endogenous glucose production after
    189 mg/min
    saline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    EGP was suppressed by exenatide [231 +/- 9 to 108 +/- 8 mg/min (54%) vs. 254 +/- 29 to189 +/- 27 mg/min (26%, P < 0.001, EXE vs. CON] and partially reversed by glucagon replacement [247 +/- 15 to 173 +/- 18 mg/min (31%)].
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).
  4. 04HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced oral glucose appearance versus saline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide reduced oral glucose appearance compared with saline.

    Outcome
    DecreaseOral glucose appearance
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Intravenous saline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · intravenous · 6 h post mealAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Oral glucose appearance
    23 g
    exenatide
    Oral glucose appearance
    39 g
    saline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Oral glucose appearance was 39 +/- 4 g in CON vs. 23 +/- 6 g in EXE (P < 0.001) and 15 +/- 5 g in E+G, (P < 0.01 vs. CON).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).
  5. 05HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, exenatide increased splanchnic glucose retention versus saline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide increased glucose retained in the gut and liver region compared with saline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSplanchnic glucose retention
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Intravenous saline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · intravenous · 6 h post mealAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Retained glucose
    ≈ 52 g
    exenatide
    Retained glucose
    ≈ 36 g
    saline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The glucose retained within the splanchnic bed increased from approximately 36g in CON to approximately 52g in EXE and to approximately 60g in E+G (P < 0.001 vs. CON).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).
  6. 06HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced acetaminophen AUC by approximately 80% versus saline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide reduced acetaminophen exposure compared with saline, consistent with slower stomach emptying.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAcetaminophen AUC
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Intravenous saline
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal motility · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · intravenous · 6 h post mealAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Acetaminophen AUC reduction
    ≈ 80%
    exenatide versus saline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Acetaminophen((AUC)) was reduced by approximately 80% in EXE vs. CON (P < 0.01).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Acetaminophen was given with the mixed meal (75 g glucose, 25 g fat, 20 g protein) to monitor gastric emptying.
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).

Studies that did not test the peptide alone5

In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  1. 07HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, exenatide plus glucagon reduced post-meal hyperglycemia versus saline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide plus glucagon lowered post-meal blood sugar compared with saline.

    Outcome
    DecreasePost-meal hyperglycemia with glucagon
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Intravenous saline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Plasma glucose
    165 mg/dl
    exenatide plus glucagon
    Plasma glucose
    206 mg/dl
    saline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Post-meal hyperglycemia was markedly reduced (P < 0.01) in EXE (138 +/- 16 mg/dl) and in E+G (165 +/- 12) compared with CON (206 +/- 15).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  2. 08HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, plasma glucagon with exenatide plus glucagon did not differ from saline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, glucagon levels with exenatide plus glucagon were similar to saline.

    Outcome
    No significant changePlasma glucagon with replacement
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Intravenous saline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Plasma glucagon
    81 pg/ml
    exenatide plus glucagon

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Baseline plasma glucagon ( approximately 90 pg/ml) decreased by approximately 20% to 73 +/- 4 pg/ml in EXE (P < 0.01) and was not different from CON in E+G (81 +/- 2).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  3. 09HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, glucagon replacement partially reversed exenatide suppression of endogenous glucose production.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, added glucagon partly reversed glucose-production suppression compared with exenatide alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGlucagon reversal of glucose-production suppression
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Exenatide alone
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Suppression
    31%
    exenatide plus glucagon
    Endogenous glucose production before
    247 mg/min
    exenatide plus glucagon
    Endogenous glucose production after
    173 mg/min
    exenatide plus glucagon

    Source sentences

    Summary
    EGP was suppressed by exenatide [231 +/- 9 to 108 +/- 8 mg/min (54%) vs. 254 +/- 29 to189 +/- 27 mg/min (26%, P < 0.001, EXE vs. CON] and partially reversed by glucagon replacement [247 +/- 15 to 173 +/- 18 mg/min (31%)].
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  4. 10HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, exenatide plus glucagon reduced oral glucose appearance versus saline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide plus glucagon reduced oral glucose appearance compared with saline.

    Outcome
    DecreaseOral glucose appearance with glucagon
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Intravenous saline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Oral glucose appearance
    15 g
    exenatide plus glucagon
    Oral glucose appearance
    39 g
    saline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Oral glucose appearance was 39 +/- 4 g in CON vs. 23 +/- 6 g in EXE (P < 0.001) and 15 +/- 5 g in E+G, (P < 0.01 vs. CON).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  5. 11HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In subjects with type 2 diabetes, exenatide plus glucagon increased splanchnic glucose retention versus saline.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, exenatide plus glucagon increased glucose retention in the gut and liver region compared with saline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSplanchnic glucose retention with glucagon
    Study

    n = 12

    Comparator
    Intravenous saline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Retained glucose
    ≈ 60 g
    exenatide plus glucagon
    Retained glucose
    ≈ 36 g
    saline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The glucose retained within the splanchnic bed increased from approximately 36g in CON to approximately 52g in EXE and to approximately 60g in E+G (P < 0.001 vs. CON).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes (3 F/9 M, 44 +/- 2 yr, BMI 34 +/- 4 kg/m2, Hb A(1c) 7.5 +/- 1.5%) participated in three meal-tolerance tests performed with double tracer technique (iv [3-3H]glucose and oral [1-14C]glucose): 1) iv saline (CON), 2) iv exenatide (EXE), and 3) iv exenatide plus glucagon (E+G).

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.