Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 551 · 2005

11 results

Exenatide versus insulin glargine in patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial.

Heine RJ, Van Gaal LF, Johns D, Mihm MJ, Widel MH, Brodows RG

Annals of internal medicine1 Oct 2005Cited by 548 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study11

11 results from studies that gave the peptide. 11 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide and insulin glargine both reduced HbA1c by 1.11%, with a between-group difference of 0.017 percentage point.

    In plain wordsExenatide and insulin glargine reduced HbA1c similarly in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHbA1c reduction
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c reduction at week 26
    1.11%
    exenatide and insulin glargine, each arm
    Between-group difference in HbA1c
    0.017 percentage point
    95% CI -0.123 to 0.157

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 26, both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced hemoglobin A1c levels by 1.11% (difference, 0.017 percentage point [95% CI, -0.123 to 0.157 percentage point]).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced postprandial glucose excursions more than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsExenatide reduced after-meal blood sugar rises more than insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreasePostprandial glucose excursions
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Exenatide reduced postprandial glucose excursions more than insulin glargine, while insulin glargine reduced fasting glucose concentrations more than exenatide.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced fasting glucose less than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsExenatide reduced fasting blood sugar less than insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    IncreaseFasting glucose concentration
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Exenatide reduced postprandial glucose excursions more than insulin glargine, while insulin glargine reduced fasting glucose concentrations more than exenatide.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, weight decreased 2.3 kg with exenatide and increased 1.8 kg with insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsPatients lost weight with exenatide but gained weight with insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWeight change
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Change in body weight
    −2.3 kg
    exenatide, week 26
    Change in body weight
    1.8 kg
    insulin glargine, week 26
    Between-group difference in body weight
    −4.1 kg
    CI -4.6 to -3.5 kg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Body weight decreased 2.3 kg with exenatide and increased 1.8 kg with insulin glargine (difference, -4.1 kg [CI, -4.6 to -3.5 kg]).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, symptomatic hypoglycemia rates were similar with exenatide and insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsSymptomatic low blood sugar occurred at similar rates with exenatide and insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSymptomatic hypoglycemia
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia were similar, but nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred less frequently with exenatide (0.9 event/patient-year versus 2.4 events/patient-year; difference, -1.6 events/patient-year [CI, -2.3 to -0.9 event/patient year]).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred less frequently with exenatide than insulin glargine, at 0.9 versus 2.4 events/patient-year.

    In plain wordsNighttime low blood sugar occurred less often with exenatide than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNocturnal hypoglycemia
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Nocturnal hypoglycemia rate
    0.9 events/patient-year
    exenatide
    Nocturnal hypoglycemia rate
    2.4 events/patient-year
    insulin glargine
    Between-group difference in nocturnal hypoglycemia rate
    −1.6 events/patient-year
    CI -2.3 to -0.9

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia were similar, but nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred less frequently with exenatide (0.9 event/patient-year versus 2.4 events/patient-year; difference, -1.6 events/patient-year [CI, -2.3 to -0.9 event/patient year]).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, nausea occurred in 57.1% with exenatide versus 8.6% with insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsNausea occurred more often with exenatide than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNausea
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Nausea incidence
    57.1%
    exenatide
    Nausea incidence
    8.6%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in the exenatide group than in the insulin glargine group, including nausea (57.1% vs. 8.6%), vomiting (17.4% vs. 3.7%) and diarrhea (8.5% vs. 3.0%).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, vomiting occurred in 17.4% with exenatide versus 3.7% with insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsVomiting occurred more often with exenatide than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseVomiting
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Vomiting incidence
    17.4%
    exenatide
    Vomiting incidence
    3.7%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in the exenatide group than in the insulin glargine group, including nausea (57.1% vs. 8.6%), vomiting (17.4% vs. 3.7%) and diarrhea (8.5% vs. 3.0%).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, diarrhea occurred in 8.5% with exenatide versus 3.0% with insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsDiarrhea occurred more often with exenatide than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseDiarrhea
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Diarrhea incidence
    8.5%
    exenatide
    Diarrhea incidence
    3%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in the exenatide group than in the insulin glargine group, including nausea (57.1% vs. 8.6%), vomiting (17.4% vs. 3.7%) and diarrhea (8.5% vs. 3.0%).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, 19.4% receiving exenatide withdrew versus 9.7% receiving insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsMore patients withdrew with exenatide than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseStudy withdrawal
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Study withdrawal
    19.4%
    exenatide
    Study withdrawal
    9.7%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Of the 551 participants, 19.4% of those receiving exenatide and 9.7% of those receiving insulin glargine withdrew from the study.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
  11. 11HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, 8.6% receiving exenatide reached the fasting glucose target versus 21.6% receiving insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsFewer patients reached the fasting blood sugar target with exenatide than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    DecreaseFasting glucose target attainment
    Study

    n = 551

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 microg twice daily · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Patients reaching fasting plasma glucose target <5.6 mmol/L
    8.6%
    exenatide
    Patients reaching fasting plasma glucose target <5.6 mmol/L
    21.6%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Only 21.6% of the insulin glargine group and 8.6% of the exenatide group achieved the target level for fasting plasma glucose of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
    Summary · context
    Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT00082381

Effect of AC2993 Compared With Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Also Using Combination Therapy With Sulfonylurea and Metformin

AstraZenecan = 551Jun 2003 to Jul 2008

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.