Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 46 · 2000

2 results

The bronchodilator effect of intravenous glucagon in asthma exacerbation: a randomized, controlled trial.

Wilber ST, Wilson JE, Blanda M, Gerson LW, Meerbaum SO, Janas G

Annals of emergency medicine1 Nov 2000Cited by 9 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In emergency department patients with asthma exacerbation, bronchodilation success occurred in 2/21 glucagon recipients versus 3/25 placebo recipients.

    In plain wordsIn patients with asthma exacerbation, glucagon produced similar bronchodilation success to placebo.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    No significant changeSuccessful bronchodilation at 10 minutes
    Study

    n = 46

    Comparator
    Saline placebo
    Outcome group
    Respiratory function · Respiratory
    Studied dose
    0.03 mg/kg · intravenousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Successful bronchodilation
    2 patients
    glucagon
    Successful bronchodilation
    9.5%
    glucagon
    Successful bronchodilation
    3 patients
    placebo
    Successful bronchodilation
    12%
    placebo
    Difference in success
    −2.5%
    glucagon versus placebo
    95% CI of difference in success
    −20.4 to 15.4%
    glucagon versus placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Success occurred in 2 (9.5%) of 21 glucagon-treated patients and 3 (12%) of 25 placebo-treated patients (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference of -2.5% [-20.4% to 15. 4%]).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Successful bronchodilation was a PEFR increase of 60 L/min at 10 minutes.
    Summary · context
    We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study at 2 university-affiliated community teaching hospital EDs (annual census 90,000).
    Summary · context
    ED patients 18 to 50 years old with asthma exacerbation and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) less than 350 L/min were eligible.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomly assigned to receive glucagon 0.03 mg/kg or an equivalent volume of saline solution intravenously.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with asthma exacerbation, mean PEFR improved by 2 L/min with glucagon versus 9 L/min with placebo.

    In plain wordsIn patients with asthma exacerbation, glucagon and placebo produced similar improvements in peak breathing flow.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    No significant changeMean PEFR improvement
    Study

    n = 46

    Comparator
    Saline placebo
    Outcome group
    Respiratory function · Respiratory
    Studied dose
    0.03 mg/kg · intravenousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean PEFR improvement
    2 L/min
    glucagon
    Mean PEFR improvement
    9 L/min
    placebo
    Difference in mean PEFR improvement
    −7 L/min
    glucagon versus placebo
    95% CI of difference in mean PEFR improvement
    −36 to 23 L/min
    glucagon versus placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Mean PEFR improvement for glucagon was 2 L/min versus 9 L/min for placebo (95% CI for difference of -7 L/min [-36 L/min to 23 L/min]).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study at 2 university-affiliated community teaching hospital EDs (annual census 90,000).
    Summary · context
    ED patients 18 to 50 years old with asthma exacerbation and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) less than 350 L/min were eligible.
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomly assigned to receive glucagon 0.03 mg/kg or an equivalent volume of saline solution intravenously.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.