Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · n = 9 · 1995

6 results

Failure of glucagon suppression contributes to postprandial hyperglycaemia in IDDM.

Dinneen S, Alzaid A, Turk D, Rizza R

Diabetologia1 Mar 1995Cited by 131 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study6

6 results from studies that gave the peptide. 6 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialPharmacokinetics

    In IDDM subjects, constant glucagon produced higher concentrations than delayed glucagon during the first 2 h: 108 versus 63 pg/ml.

    In plain wordsIn IDDM subjects, constant glucagon produced higher blood glucagon concentrations than delayed glucagon.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    IncreaseGlucagon concentration
    Study

    n = 9

    Comparator
    Glucagon started 2 h after glucose ingestion
    Outcome group
    Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Glucagon concentration
    108 pg/ml
    constant; +/- 2
    Glucagon concentration
    63 pg/ml
    suppressed; +/- 1

    Source sentences

    Summary
    This resulted in lower (p < 0.001) glucagon concentrations during the first 2 h of the suppressed than during the constant glucagon study days (63 +/- 1 vs 108 +/- 2 pg/ml).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To determine if, and the mechanism by which, lack of postprandial suppression of glucagon contributes to hyperglycaemia, nine subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) ingested 50 g of glucose containing both [2-3H] glucose and [6-3H] glucose on two occasions.
    Summary · context
    [6-14C] glucose, insulin and low-dose somatostatin were infused intravenously at the same rates on both occasions.
    Summary · context
    A basal glucagon infusion was started either at the same time ("constant glucagon") or 2 h following ("suppressed glucagon") glucose ingestion.
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In IDDM subjects, constant glucagon increased postprandial glucose compared with delayed glucagon: 10.3 versus 8.1 mmol/l.

    In plain wordsIn IDDM subjects, constant glucagon produced higher glucose after a meal than delayed glucagon.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    IncreasePostprandial glucose concentration
    Study

    n = 9

    Comparator
    Glucagon started 2 h after glucose ingestion
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Postprandial glucose
    10.3 mmol/l
    constant; +/- 0.9
    Postprandial glucose
    8.1 mmol/l
    suppressed; +/- 0.7

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lack of suppression of glucagon led to higher (p < 0.01) postprandial glucose concentrations (10.3 +/- 0.9 vs 8.1 +/- 0.7 mmol/l) and a greater (p < 0.02) integrated glycaemic response.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To determine if, and the mechanism by which, lack of postprandial suppression of glucagon contributes to hyperglycaemia, nine subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) ingested 50 g of glucose containing both [2-3H] glucose and [6-3H] glucose on two occasions.
    Summary · context
    [6-14C] glucose, insulin and low-dose somatostatin were infused intravenously at the same rates on both occasions.
    Summary · context
    A basal glucagon infusion was started either at the same time ("constant glucagon") or 2 h following ("suppressed glucagon") glucose ingestion.
  3. 03HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In IDDM subjects, constant glucagon increased the integrated glycaemic response compared with delayed glucagon.

    In plain wordsIn IDDM subjects, constant glucagon increased the overall glucose response compared with delayed glucagon.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    IncreaseIntegrated glycaemic response
    Study

    n = 9

    Comparator
    Glucagon started 2 h after glucose ingestion
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lack of suppression of glucagon led to higher (p < 0.01) postprandial glucose concentrations (10.3 +/- 0.9 vs 8.1 +/- 0.7 mmol/l) and a greater (p < 0.02) integrated glycaemic response.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To determine if, and the mechanism by which, lack of postprandial suppression of glucagon contributes to hyperglycaemia, nine subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) ingested 50 g of glucose containing both [2-3H] glucose and [6-3H] glucose on two occasions.
    Summary · context
    [6-14C] glucose, insulin and low-dose somatostatin were infused intravenously at the same rates on both occasions.
    Summary · context
    A basal glucagon infusion was started either at the same time ("constant glucagon") or 2 h following ("suppressed glucagon") glucose ingestion.
  4. 04HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In IDDM subjects, constant glucagon increased hepatic glucose release versus delayed glucagon using the [6-3H] tracer: 2.6 versus 2.0 mmol.kg-1 per 6 h.

    In plain wordsIn IDDM subjects, constant glucagon increased liver glucose release compared with delayed glucagon, as measured with the first tracer.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    IncreasePostprandial hepatic glucose release using [6-3H] glucose
    Study

    n = 9

    Comparator
    Glucagon started 2 h after glucose ingestion
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hepatic glucose release
    2.6 mmol.kg-1 per 6 h
    constant; +/- 0.2
    Hepatic glucose release
    2 mmol.kg-1 per 6 h
    suppressed; +/- 0.2

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The excessive rise in glucose was due to higher (p < 0.02) rates of postprandial hepatic glucose release during the constant than during the suppressed glucagon study days, whether measured using either [6-3H] glucose (2.6 +/- 0.2 vs 2.0 +/- 0.2 mmol.kg-1 per 6 h) or [2-3H] glucose (3.0 +/- 0.3 vs 2…
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To determine if, and the mechanism by which, lack of postprandial suppression of glucagon contributes to hyperglycaemia, nine subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) ingested 50 g of glucose containing both [2-3H] glucose and [6-3H] glucose on two occasions.
    Summary · context
    [6-14C] glucose, insulin and low-dose somatostatin were infused intravenously at the same rates on both occasions.
    Summary · context
    A basal glucagon infusion was started either at the same time ("constant glucagon") or 2 h following ("suppressed glucagon") glucose ingestion.
  5. 05HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In IDDM subjects, constant glucagon increased hepatic glucose release versus delayed glucagon using the [2-3H] tracer: 3.0 versus 2.4 mmol.kg-1 per 6 h.

    In plain wordsIn IDDM subjects, constant glucagon increased liver glucose release compared with delayed glucagon, as measured with the second tracer.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    IncreasePostprandial hepatic glucose release using [2-3H] glucose
    Study

    n = 9

    Comparator
    Glucagon started 2 h after glucose ingestion
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hepatic glucose release
    3 mmol.kg-1 per 6 h
    constant; +/- 0.3
    Hepatic glucose release
    2.4 mmol.kg-1 per 6 h
    suppressed; +/- 0.2

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The excessive rise in glucose was due to higher (p < 0.02) rates of postprandial hepatic glucose release during the constant than during the suppressed glucagon study days, whether measured using either [6-3H] glucose (2.6 +/- 0.2 vs 2.0 +/- 0.2 mmol.kg-1 per 6 h) or [2-3H] glucose (3.0 +/- 0.3 vs 2…
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To determine if, and the mechanism by which, lack of postprandial suppression of glucagon contributes to hyperglycaemia, nine subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) ingested 50 g of glucose containing both [2-3H] glucose and [6-3H] glucose on two occasions.
    Summary · context
    [6-14C] glucose, insulin and low-dose somatostatin were infused intravenously at the same rates on both occasions.
    Summary · context
    A basal glucagon infusion was started either at the same time ("constant glucagon") or 2 h following ("suppressed glucagon") glucose ingestion.
  6. 06HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In IDDM subjects, glucose disappearance, initial splanchnic glucose clearance and hepatic glucose cycling did not differ between constant and delayed glucagon.

    In plain wordsIn IDDM subjects, glucose disappearance, initial abdominal glucose clearance and liver glucose cycling did not differ between constant and delayed glucagon.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    No significant changeGlucose disappearance, initial splanchnic glucose clearance and hepatic glucose cycling
    Study

    n = 9

    Comparator
    Glucagon started 2 h after glucose ingestion
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Glucose disappearance, initial splanchnic glucose clearance and hepatic glucose cycling did not differ on the two occasions.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To determine if, and the mechanism by which, lack of postprandial suppression of glucagon contributes to hyperglycaemia, nine subjects with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) ingested 50 g of glucose containing both [2-3H] glucose and [6-3H] glucose on two occasions.
    Summary · context
    [6-14C] glucose, insulin and low-dose somatostatin were infused intravenously at the same rates on both occasions.
    Summary · context
    A basal glucagon infusion was started either at the same time ("constant glucagon") or 2 h following ("suppressed glucagon") glucose ingestion.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.