In children with primary nocturnal enuresis, improvement was 70% with desmopressin versus 86% with alarm, without a significant difference.
In plain wordsIn children with nocturnal enuresis, improvement rates did not differ significantly between desmopressin and alarm.
- Peptide
- Desmopressin
- Outcome
- No significant changeImprovement rate
- Study
n = 46
- Comparator
- Enuresis alarm
- Outcome group
- Enuresis · Kidney and urinary
- Studied dose
- 20 micrograms nightly · intranasal · three monthsAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Improvement rate
- 70%
- intranasal desmopressin group
- Improvement rate
- 86%
- enuresis alarm group
Source sentences
The improvement rate was 70% in the group given desmopressin and 86% in the group treated with alarm; the difference was not significant.
2 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
Fifty children with primary nocturnal enuresis were randomised for a study comparing desmopressin (DDAVP) and enuresis alarm.
Forty six completed the trial, 24 of whom were treated with 20 micrograms intranasal desmopressin nightly and 22 with enuresis alarm for three months.