Skip to content

Study · Observational study · 1992

2 results

The role of desmopressin acetate in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A controlled clinical trial with thromboelastographic risk stratification.

Mongan PD, Hosking MP

Anesthesiology1 Jul 1992Cited by 83 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    After coronary bypass, desmopressin recipients with abnormal platelet function had no increased chest drainage versus desmopressin recipients with normal function.

    In plain wordsAfter coronary bypass, desmopressin recipients with abnormal platelet function had no increased chest drainage versus recipients with normal function.

    Outcome
    No significant changeMediastinal chest tube drainage by platelet-function stratum
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Desmopressin-treated patients with normal platelet-fibrinogen function (group 1)
    Outcome group
    Bleeding and clotting · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    0.3 microgram.kg-1As given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The desmopressin-treated patients in group 2 neither experienced increased mediastinal chest tube drainage nor received increased amounts of homologous blood products when compared to those in group 1.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    One hundred fifteen patients completed a prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the effect of desmopressin acetate (0.3 microgram.kg-1)
    Summary · context
    Group 1 (TEG:MA greater than 50 mm) consisted of 86 patients, of whom 44 received desmopressin and 42 received placebo. Twenty-nine patients had abnormal platelet function (TEG:MA less than 50 mm) and were designated as group 2. In group 2, 13 received desmopressin and 16 placebo.
  2. 02HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    After coronary bypass, desmopressin recipients with abnormal platelet function received no increased blood products versus desmopressin recipients with normal function.

    In plain wordsAfter coronary bypass, desmopressin recipients with abnormal platelet function received no increased blood products versus recipients with normal function.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHomologous blood products by platelet-function stratum
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Desmopressin-treated patients with normal platelet-fibrinogen function (group 1)
    Outcome group
    Bleeding and clotting · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    0.3 microgram.kg-1As given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The desmopressin-treated patients in group 2 neither experienced increased mediastinal chest tube drainage nor received increased amounts of homologous blood products when compared to those in group 1.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    One hundred fifteen patients completed a prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the effect of desmopressin acetate (0.3 microgram.kg-1)
    Summary · context
    Group 1 (TEG:MA greater than 50 mm) consisted of 86 patients, of whom 44 received desmopressin and 42 received placebo. Twenty-nine patients had abnormal platelet function (TEG:MA less than 50 mm) and were designated as group 2. In group 2, 13 received desmopressin and 16 placebo.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 ongoing · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

RecruitingPhase not statedNCT07179991

DDAVP Effect by TEG6 in Cardiac Surgery

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sn = 1001 Aug 2026 to est. 31 Dec 2028

Intraoperative Bleeding

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 21 Sept 2026

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.