Trial · Interventional
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2Registry dataThe Effect of Osteoporotic Medications on Vertebral Bone Quality Score
Overview
- Status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Sponsor
- State University of New York at Buffalo · Other
- Design
- Allocation not applicable · Open label (no masking)
- Countries
1 country
United States
- Start
- 18 Jun 2026
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 May 2026
- Last update posted
- 23 Jul 2026
- Conditions
- Lumbar Degenerative Disease
Timeline
1 trial · 1 ongoing
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 2
The Effect of Osteoporotic Medications on Vertebral Bone Quality Score
NCT0758777518 Jun 2026 to est. 31 Dec 2028
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the change in VBQ score, T score, TBS, and Hounsfield Units (HU) after 3-6 months of treatment with abaloparatide in osteoporotic patients who will undergo spinal fusion and decompression for lumbar degenerative disease. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer is: Does abaloparatide improve bone density in these patients, as defined by VBQ score compared to traditional methods such as DEXA and Hounsfield Units Does abaloparatide reduce the incidence of postoperative mechanical complications, including adjacent segment disease, subsidence, and proximal junctional kyphosis (PKJ)? Participants will undergo a presurgical assessments and trained in clinic on the subcutaneous application of abaloparatide. Prior to treatment, patients will have baseline assessments, including a lumbar MRI, DEXA scan, and lumbar CT. Post-surgically, participants will administer abaloparatide and return to clinic after 3-6 months for follow-up assessments including a new MRI, lumbar CT, and DEXA scan. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years postoperatively to identify complications such as adjacent segment disease, pseudarthrosis, failure of instrumentation, and PJK.
Interventions
- AbaloparatideDrug
Arms1
Experimental
Abaloparatide
3-6 months of self-administered abaloparatide in osteoporotic patients will undergo spinal fusion and decompression for lumbar degenerative disease
Primary outcomes12
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 6 weeks post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using Vertebral Bone Quality
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 6 weeks post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using Hounsfield Units
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 6 weeks post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using DEXA (Dual-Energy X-ray ABsorptiometry)
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 6 months post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using Vertebral Bone Quality
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 6 months post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using Hounsfield Units
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 6 months post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using DEXA (Dual-Energy X-ray ABsorptiometry)
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 12 months post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using Vertebral Bone Quality
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 12 months post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using Hounsfield Units
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 12 months post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using DEXA (Dual-Energy X-ray ABsorptiometry)
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 24 months post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using Vertebral Bone Quality
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 24 months post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using Hounsfield Units
Improvement in Bone Quality
Time frame · 24 months post-op
Registry description
Improvement in bone quality, using DEXA (Dual-Energy X-ray ABsorptiometry)
Secondary outcomes(4)
Surgical Complications
Time frame · 6 weeks post-operatively
Registry description
Presence of complications associated with fusion, such as Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, adjacent segment disease, mechanical failure, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes.
Surgical Complications
Time frame · 6 months post-operatively
Registry description
Presence of complications associated with fusion, such as PJK, PJF, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, adjacent segment disease, mechanical failure, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes.
Surgical Complications
Time frame · 12 months post-operatively
Registry description
Presence of complications associated with fusion, such as PJK, PJF, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, adjacent segment disease, mechanical failure, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes.
Surgical Complications
Time frame · 24 months post-operatively
Registry description
Presence of complications associated with fusion, such as PJK, PJF, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, adjacent segment disease, mechanical failure, reoperation, and patient-reported outcomes.
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- All
- Age
- from 50 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.