Trial · Interventional
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4Registry dataPrecision Medicine Approach for Osteoporosis - Follow Up Study
Overview
- Status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Enrollment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Paul F Netzel · Other
- Design
- Not randomized · Open label (no masking)
- Countries
1 country
United States
- Start
- 1 Feb 2024
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2024
- Last update posted
- 1 Apr 2026
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
Timeline
1 trial · 1 ongoing
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 4
Precision Medicine Approach for Osteoporosis - Follow Up Study
NCT062646091 Feb 2024 to est. 31 Dec 2029
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
Osteoporosis is a health problem of major proportions. It affects more than 40 million Americans and results in more than 2 million fractures annually among Medicare patients alone. Hospital admissions for osteoporotic fractures exceed those of heart attacks, strokes and breast cancer combined. Osteoporosis is commonly considered a disease associated with menopause. This estrogen deficiency related bone loss is characterized by high bone turnover with increased resorption without commensurate changes in bone formation. It is in contrast to age-related bone loss, which starts as early as in the fourth decade of life and continues with increasing age. Age-related bone loss is usually associated with lower bone turnover and decreased bone formation is the main abnormality. Current therapies do not address age-related bone loss and the special needs of the age-related osteoporosis population is currently ignored. This is to a great degree due to difficulties associated with the bone biopsy necessary for unequivocal determination of bone turnover status. Thus, the current standard of care relies on starting with an antiresorber, which is of limited effectiveness in age-related osteoporosis, and in fact impedes the effectiveness of the appropriate anabolic medication. In a current ongoing study - Novel precision medicine approach to treatment of osteoporosis based on bone turnover. EIRB#70781; efforts are focused on addressing this particular problem. Our follow-up study seeks to achieve one specific aim: to compare effectiveness of Alendronate vs Teriparatide after participants have been switched at the end of treatment at year one, to the other drug at year two for the same duration of treatment.
Interventions
- AlendronateDrug
- TeriparatideDrug
- AlendronateDrug
Arms3
Experimental
Group 1 Low Turnover - crossover
Alendronate
Experimental
Group 2 Low Turnover - crossover
Teriparatide
Experimental
Group 2 Low Turnover - continuation
Alendronate
Primary outcomes1
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Percent change in bone loss
Time frame · 12 months
Registry description
The primary endpoint for the follow up study will be bone loss as determined by the percent change in DXA absolute values of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip and radius measured at baseline, at the end of the one-year trial; and at end of the one year follow up study. DXA is chosen because of its wide availability, low radioactivity exposure, and clinical use.
Secondary outcomes(1)
Percent change in Bone Mass Density at the hip
Time frame · 12 months
Registry description
Secondary endpoints will be percent change in BMD at the hip measured at baseline, at the end of the one-year trial; and at end of the one year follow up study. DXA is chosen because of its wide availability, low radioactivity exposure, and clinical use.
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- from 45 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.