Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedNot applicableResults postedRegistry data

DeADT - Living Well With Prostate Cancer

Short name DeADT-LW

NCTNCT06199986 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other id1656029Other idR37CA222885

This trial does not test a peptide that PepBank tracks.

  • Names Goserelin, does not test it. It appears in the description.
  • Names Leuprolide, does not test it. It appears in the description.

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Not applicable
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Sponsor
University of Michigan · Other
Design
Randomized · Open label (no masking)
Countries
1 country

United States

Start
4 Oct 2022
Primary completion
16 Apr 2024
Completion
16 Apr 2024
First posted
10 Jan 2024
Last update posted
26 Jun 2025
Conditions
Prostate Cancer

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
2022202320242025
  1. N/A

    DeADT-LW

    NCT06199986

    4 Oct 2022 to 16 Apr 2024

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The goal of this randomized de-implementation trial is to compare two strategies to reduce low-value androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use for prostate cancer care. The aim of the study is to compare implementation of the two strategies: use of a clinical reminder order check intervention versus a provider script/patient education approach, and their impacts on low-value ADT use after six months. The main goal of both interventions will be to decrease ADT overuse for patients with prostate cancer, but to do this in a way that is acceptable to the clinicians who treat these patients. The interventions will be initiated for providers only across 4 participating facilities. Provider participants will engage with one of the interventions triggered in the electronic health record when their patients are deemed likely to be receiving low-value ADT. Each provider participant receives only one of the interventions. The intervention is triggered for every clinic visit involving a patient deemed to be receiving low-value ADT, so provider participants may receive their assigned intervention multiple times. Researchers will compare provider use of both strategies to determine implementation outcomes and whether one was more effective in reducing low-value ADT use.

Interventions

  • ADT Order Check Attestation (Or)Behavioral
  • Provider Script (Sc)Behavioral

Arms3

  • Experimental

    ADT Order Check Attestation (Or)

    Study staff will place a "Living Well ADT" health factor in the electronic medical record for patients already receiving ADT, and whose clinic visits the study team have confirmed to be targets for ADT de-implementation. Health factors will be entered as eligible clinic visits are identified. This health factor combined with a low PSA level (most recent PSA \< 2) will trigger the ADT Order Check Attestation Intervention (Or) when the provider participant places an order for ADT (e.g., Lupron, Eligard, Goserelin, and Zoladex). Provider participants may override the order check by entering text indicating the reason and continue with the ordering process.

  • Experimental

    Provider Script (Sc)

    Study staff will enter an electronic health record progress note approximately one business day prior to a target low-value ADT clinic visit from a patient already receiving ADT. The note will include scripted talking points for the provider participant to help with discussion and recent PSA levels and can be edited, signed, or deleted by the provider, giving a quick and simple way to document the discussion. The progress note will prompt provider participants to indicate whether a patient prefers to continue or discontinue ADT. The progress note will include links to a patient-facing clinic handout which will be posted on an external website. Provider participants may modify, ignore, or delete the progress note.

  • No intervention

    Control

    The study team will match up to 8 sites (i.e., medical centers) to the 4 randomized sites as contemporary controls where no interventions have been deployed to compare the primary outcome of interruption of low-value ADT injections. Low-value ADT injections, eligible clinic visits, and primary outcomes for a matched 6-month period will be ascertained through chart review and compared to intervention site primary outcomes.

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Effectiveness - Interruption in Low Value ADT Injection (i.e., Take a Break From ADT)

    Time frame · 6 months

    Registry description

    The proportion of patients receiving ADT whose prescribed ADT injections were interrupted, as shown by count of patients whose injections were interrupted.

Secondary outcomes(6)
  1. Reach

    Time frame · 6 months

    Registry description

    The percentage of provider participants who have prescribed ADT before, were asked to participate in the study, and did not opt out of the study.

  2. Penetration - ADT Order Check Attestation (OR) Intervention

    Time frame · 6 months

    Registry description

    Proportion of OR interventions where the provider participant did not override the order check and prescribe ADT. These providers received the education session about the order checks in the study. However, because of technological problems, the order check did not activate within the 6-month study period.

  3. Penetration - Provider Script (SC) Intervention

    Time frame · 6 months

    Registry description

    The total number of SC intervention notes assigned to participant providers by the study team that were actually signed by the providers.

  4. Feasibility - Site Level: Medical Center Director (MCD) Approval

    Time frame · Within 1 month of request to participate being sent

    Registry description

    The percentage of sites (i.e., medical centers) asked to participate that received MCD approval to implement the intervention (Order Check or Progress Note/Patient Handout). Each site has only one MCD.

  5. Feasibility - Site Level: Fully Operationalized Intervention

    Time frame · 6 months

    Registry description

    The percentage of approved sites with fully operationalized intervention, i.e. intervention programmed into site EHR and ready to be implemented. Depending on randomization arm, this included either health factor placement or script assignment prior to at least one patient visit.

  6. Feasibility - Clinic Level Activation: Clinics With Intervention Implementation

    Time frame · Within 6 months

    Registry description

    The percentage of approved sites with at least 1 intervention implemented, i.e. at least 1 health factor assigned and/or at least 1 progress note assigned to a provider participant.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeCount of participants· 6 months

Effectiveness - Interruption in Low Value ADT Injection (i.e., Take a Break From ADT)

GroupValue (Participants)
ADT Order Check Attestation (Or) - Patients12
Provider Script (Sc) - Patients28
Control24
Secondary and other outcome results(6)
Secondary outcomeNumber· 6 months

Reach

GroupValue (percentage of provider participants)
ADT Order Check Attestation (Or) - Providers100
Provider Script (Sc) - Providers100
Secondary outcomeNumber· 6 months

Penetration - ADT Order Check Attestation (OR) Intervention

GroupValue (proportion of OR interventions)
ADT Order Check Attestation (Or) - Providers0
Secondary outcomeCount of units· 6 months

Penetration - Provider Script (SC) Intervention

GroupValue (notes)
Provider Script (Sc) - Providers64
Secondary outcomeCount of units· Within 1 month of request to participate being sent

Feasibility - Site Level: Medical Center Director (MCD) Approval

GroupValue (sites)
ADT Order Check Attestation (Or) - Providers2
Provider Script (Sc) - Providers2
Secondary outcomeCount of units· 6 months

Feasibility - Site Level: Fully Operationalized Intervention

GroupValue (sites)
ADT Order Check Attestation (Or) - Providers2
Provider Script (Sc) - Providers2
Secondary outcomeCount of units· Within 6 months

Feasibility - Clinic Level Activation: Clinics With Intervention Implementation

GroupValue (sites)
ADT Order Check Attestation (Or) - Providers0
Provider Script (Sc) - Providers2

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
ADT Order Check Attestation (Or)Study staff placed a "Living Well ADT" health factor in the electronic medical record for patients already receiving ADT, and whose clinic visits the study team confirmed to be targets for ADT de-implementation. Health factors were entered as eligible clinic visits were identified. This health factor combined with a low PSA level (most recent PSA \< 2) triggered the ADT Order Check Attestation Intervention (Or) when the provider participant placed an order for ADT (e.g., Lupron, Eligard, Goserelin, and Zoladex). Provider participants could override the order check by entering text indicating the reason and continue with the ordering process. ADT Order Check Attestation (Or): Clinical reminder order check in electronic health record.0 / 00 / 00 / 0
ADT Order Check Attestation (Or) - PatientsStudy staff placed a "Living Well ADT" health factor in the electronic medical record for patients already receiving ADT, and whose clinic visits the study team confirmed to be targets for ADT de-implementation. Health factors were entered as eligible clinic visits were identified. This health factor combined with a low PSA level (most recent PSA \< 2) triggered the ADT Order Check Attestation Intervention (Or) when the provider participant placed an order for ADT (e.g., Lupron, Eligard, Goserelin, and Zoladex). Provider participants could override the order check by entering text indicating the reason and continue with the ordering process. ADT Order Check Attestation (Or): Clinical reminder order check in electronic health record.0 / 00 / 00 / 0
Provider Script (Sc)Study staff entered an electronic health record progress note approximately one business day prior to a target low-value ADT clinic visit from a patient already receiving ADT. The note included scripted talking points for the provider participant to help with discussion and recent PSA levels and could be edited, signed, or deleted by the provider, giving a quick and simple way to document the discussion. The progress note prompted provider participants to indicate whether a patient preferred to continue or discontinue ADT. The progress note included links to a patient-facing clinic handout which was posted on an external website. Provider participants could modify, ignore, or delete the progress note. Provider Script (Sc): Provider script added to progress note in electronic health record.0 / 00 / 00 / 0
Provider Script (Sc) - PatientsStudy staff entered an electronic health record progress note approximately one business day prior to a target low-value ADT clinic visit from a patient already receiving ADT. The note included scripted talking points for the provider participant to help with discussion and recent PSA levels and could be edited, signed, or deleted by the provider, giving a quick and simple way to document the discussion. The progress note prompted provider participants to indicate whether a patient preferred to continue or discontinue ADT. The progress note included links to a patient-facing clinic handout which was posted on an external website. Provider participants could modify, ignore, or delete the progress note. Provider Script (Sc): Provider script added to progress note in electronic health record.0 / 00 / 00 / 0
ControlThe study team matched 4 sites (i.e., medical centers) to the 4 randomized sites as contemporary controls where no interventions were deployed to compare the primary outcome of interruption of low-value ADT injections. Low-value ADT injections, eligible clinic visits, and primary outcomes for a matched 6-month period were ascertained through chart review and compared to intervention site primary outcomes.0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies0

Studies that cite this trial.

No study cites this trial.

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
Not stated
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Any provider at participating sites who prescribes ADT for prostate cancer patients Exclusion Criteria: * Providers opting out of study

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.