Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24
| Group | Value (Percent Change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Enlicitide Decanoate | -58.2 | 28.0 |
| Placebo | 2.6 | 23.6 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataUnited States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Finland, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
A Study of Enlicitide Decanoate (MK-0616 Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor) in Adults With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (MK-0616-017/CORALreef HeFH)
NCT059528698 Aug 2023 to 7 Apr 2025
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of enlicitide decanoate in adult participants with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. The primary hypothesis is that enlicitide decanoate is superior to placebo on mean percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24.
Experimental
Enlicitide Decanoate
Participants received 20 mg of enlicitide decanoate orally once daily (QD) for up to 52 weeks.
Placebo comparator
Placebo
Participants received enlicitide decanoate-matching placebo orally QD for up to 52 weeks.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24
Time frame · Baseline and Week 24
Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 24 to determine mean percent change in LDL-C. The two treatment groups were compared using an analysis of covariance model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline LDL-C as a covariate.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame · Up to 64 weeks (8 weeks postdose)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE
Time frame · Up to 56 weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline and Week 52
Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 52 to determine mean percent change in LDL-C. The two treatment groups were compared using an analysis of covariance model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline LDL-C as a covariate.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 24
Time frame · Baseline and Week 24
Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 24 to determine mean percent change in non-HDL-C. The two treatment groups were compared using an analysis of covariance model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline non-HDL-C as a covariate.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 24
Time frame · Baseline and Week 24
Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 24 to determine mean percent change in ApoB. The two treatment groups were compared using an analysis of covariance model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline ApoB as a covariate.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) at Week 24
Time frame · Baseline and Week 24
Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 24 to determine percent change in Lp(a). For percent change in Lp(a) at Week 24, the two treatment groups were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test with Hodges-Lehmann estimation.
Percentage of Participants With LDL-C <70 mg/dL and ≥50% Reduction From Baseline at Week 24
Time frame · Baseline and Week 24
Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 24 to determine the percentage of participants who had LDL-C \<70 mg/dL and ≥50% reduction from baseline. The two treatment groups were analyzed based on the Miettinen and Nurminen method for the difference in percentage.
Percentage of Participants With LDL-C <55 mg/dL and ≥50% Reduction From Baseline at Week 24
Time frame · Baseline and Week 24
Blood samples were collected at baseline and at Week 24 to determine the percentage of participants who had LDL-C \<55 mg/dL and ≥50% reduction from baseline. The two treatment groups were analyzed based on the Miettinen and Nurminen method for the difference in percentage.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Percent Change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Enlicitide Decanoate | -58.2 | 28.0 |
| Placebo | 2.6 | 23.6 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Enlicitide Decanoate | 157 |
| Placebo | 77 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Enlicitide Decanoate | 4 |
| Placebo | 3 |
| Group | Value (Percent Change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Enlicitide Decanoate | -55.3 | 27.9 |
| Placebo | 8.7 | 33.0 |
| Group | Value (Percent Change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Enlicitide Decanoate | -52.3 | 26.9 |
| Placebo | 2.1 | 20.5 |
| Group | Value (Percent Change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Enlicitide Decanoate | -48.2 | 23.6 |
| Placebo | 1.8 | 17.5 |
| Group | Value (Percent Change) |
|---|---|
| Enlicitide Decanoate | -24.7 |
| Placebo | -1.6 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of Participants) |
|---|---|
| Enlicitide Decanoate | 70.8 |
| Placebo | 1.0 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enlicitide DecanoateParticipants received 20 mg of enlicitide decanoate orally once daily (QD) for up to 52 weeks. | 1 / 202 | 9 / 202 | 102 / 202 |
| PlaceboParticipants received enlicitide decanoate-matching placebo orally QD for up to 52 weeks. | 0 / 101 | 4 / 101 | 43 / 101 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2026
Ballantyne et al. 2026JAMAcited by 34
PMID 41206969PMC12598580DOI 10.1001/jama.2025.20620PUB-41206969
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated