Subjective Effect of Alcohol - Craving
| Group | Value (units on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin Session (Clamp) | 1.6 | 11.4 |
| Placebo Session (Clamp) | 10.5 | 10.3 |
Trial · Interventional
TerminatedPhase 2Results postedRegistry dataThis trial was stopped early.
Reason given at the registry: Due to complications delaying the availability of the intranasal oxytocin and IV alcohol solutions needed for this project, we were unable to complete subjects in the self-administration arm of this study.
Results were posted for this trial.
United States
1 trial · 1 stopped early · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This pilot study is intended to demonstrate feasibility and acquire preliminary data. If successful, this data could support a future project studying the effect of oxytocin on tolerance and alcohol seeking in humans.
Experimental
Clamp
Repeated subjective and cognitive tests during a 4 hour session that includes a baseline period, an oxytocin or placebo delivery, absorption and testing period, and a 2 hour alcohol clamp. Oxytocin or placebo were delivered intranasally in two sessions, scheduled 3-4 weeks apart, double blind.
Experimental
Progressive work for alcohol
Progressive work alcohol exposure, 2 sessions (intranasal oxytocin or placebo), double blind. Note this Arm was not completed (see Overall Status for explanation of study termination)
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Subjective Effect of Alcohol - Craving
Time frame · 2 single day laboratory sessions, one with intranasal oxytocin, one with intranasal placebo, scheduled 3-4 weeks apart, order counter-balanced.
Participants rated their subjective feeling of craving on a scale of 0-100. Tolerance to alcohol is assessed by subtracting subjective ratings at the beginning of the 2 hour alcohol infusion from ratings at the end; a negative value indicates tolerance. Possible scores ranged from -100 to 100; negative scores indicate the development of tolerance. Values reported here compare tolerance developed during the oxytocin session to tolerance developed during the placebo session.
Subjective Effects of Alcohol - Intoxication
Time frame · 2 single day laboratory sessions, one with intranasal oxytocin, one with intranasal placebo, scheduled 3-4 weeks apart, order counter-balanced.
Participants rated their subjective feeling of intoxication on a scale of 0-100. Tolerance to alcohol is assessed by subtracting subjective ratings at the beginning of the 2 hour alcohol infusion from ratings at the end. Using this calculation, theoretical scores in this dataset could range from -100-100; negative scores indicate the development of tolerance. Values reported here compare tolerance developed during the oxytocin session to tolerance developed during the placebo session.
Stop Signal Response Task
Time frame · 2 single day laboratory sessions, one with intranasal oxytocin, one with intranasal placebo, scheduled 3-4 weeks apart, order counter-balanced.
The Stop Signal task asks participants to respond as quickly as they can to one stimulus (the "Go" signal) but withhold this response when a second, much rarer stimulus appears (the "Stop" signal). Performance reported here uses the variable ssRT Med, which is an estimate of the time (in ms) needed to stop and withdraw the response; alcohol is known to increase ssRT Med. To assess tolerance, the value of ssRT Med measured at the beginning of the 2 hour alcohol clamp was subtracted from the value measured at the end. The theoretical range of possible scores on this measure range from about -100 to 200; negative scores indicate the development of tolerance. Values reported here compare tolerance developed during the oxytocin session to tolerance developed during the placebo session.
Stroop Test
Time frame · 2 single day laboratory sessions, one with intranasal oxytocin, one with intranasal placebo, scheduled 3-4 weeks apart, order counter-balanced.
The Stroop Interference task asks participants to respond to one aspect of a stimulus (in this case, the color of the text in which a word is printed) under conditions in which the word meaning either enhances or interferes with the task (for example, the word Green in a Green font speeds performance, while the word Green in a Yellow font slows performance). Tolerance to alcohol was assessed by subtracting response latency (ms) on correct trials at the beginning of the 2 hour alcohol infusion from latency on correct trials at the end. Theoretical scores ranged from about -200 to 250; negative scores indicate the development of tolerance. Values reported here compare tolerance developed during the oxytocin session to tolerance developed during the placebo session.
Alcohol Purchase Task (Variable OMax)
Time frame · 2 single day laboratory sessions, one with intranasal oxytocin, one with intranasal placebo
The Alcohol Purchase task (APT) tests the value participants place on alcohol at specific times and conditions of the experimental session. To complete the APT, participants fill out a table reporting how many drinks (allowed range 0-50) they would purchase during an evening out, for a cost ranging from $0 to $30/drink. From this, a value for # of drinks \* cost of drink is calculated; OMax is the highest amount in dollars that a participant would spend (possible range = $0 to $1,500). Tolerance to the effect of alcohol is calculated as OMax (end of infusion) - OMax (beginning of infusion), possible values range from -$1,500 to $1,500. Negative scores indicate the development of tolerance. Values reported here compare tolerance developed during the oxytocin session to tolerance developed during the placebo session.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (units on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin Session (Clamp) | 1.6 | 11.4 |
| Placebo Session (Clamp) | 10.5 | 10.3 |
| Group | Value (units on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin Session (Clamp) | 1.0 | 7.8 |
| Placebo Session (Clamp) | 7.8 | 13.2 |
| Group | Value (milliseconds) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin Session (Clamp) | -1.8 | 18 |
| Placebo Session (Clamp) | -1.1 | 8 |
| Group | Value (milliseconds) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin Session (Clamp) | -1.56 | 13.3 |
| Placebo Session (Clamp) | -29.82 | 13.1 |
| Group | Value (dollars) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin Session (Clamp) | -1.0 | 2.1 |
| Placebo Session (Clamp) | -3.2 | 2.2 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin SessionMeasurements acquired during the Oxytocin Session | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 2 / 6 |
| PlaceboMeasurements acquired during the placebo session | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 4 / 6 |
| Between Session IntervalEvents occurring between the first and second session day | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 1 / 6 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated