Participant Satisfaction Assessed Through the Trial Feedback Questionnaire (TFQ)
| Group | Value (Score on a Scale) |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Fulvestrant | 99.5 |
Trial · Interventional
TerminatedPhase 2Results postedRegistry dataShort name TELEPIK
This trial was stopped early.
Reason given at the registry: Study early terminated due to low enrollment compared to the anticipated figures
Results were posted for this trial.
Sweden
1 trial · 1 stopped early · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The study was designed to identify and register practical observations and experiences in connection with planning and implementing decentralized, patient-centered clinical trials at a geographic distance with virtual elements.
Experimental
Alpelisib + fulvestrant
Participants were administered alpelisib at a daily dose of 300 mg for 12 cycles of 28 days and fulvestrant at a dose of 500 mg via intramuscular injection on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15, and Day 1 of each subsequent cycle up to Cycle 12. Pre-menopausal women also received goserelin at a dose of 3.6 mg on Day 1 of each cycle.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Participant Satisfaction Assessed Through the Trial Feedback Questionnaire (TFQ)
Time frame · Baseline, and on Day 1 of Cycle 4 and 7. Cycle= 28 days
The TFQ was designed to capture the patient's experience during a clinical trial. The questionnaire consisted of 23 questions that assessed various aspects of the trial experience. Each question in the TFQ scored on a scale ranging from 1 (representing the worst response) to 5 (representing the best response). To calculate the total score, the scores obtained from each of the 23 questions were summed up. The resulting sum represented the participant's total score, which could ranged from 23 (indicating the lowest possible score) to 115 (indicating the highest possible score).
Patient Retention on the Decentralized Clinical Trial (DCT) Approach
Time frame · At 3 and 6 months
Patient retention on the DCT approach was calculated as the percentage of participants on remote monitoring for participants still on treatment
Number of Unscheduled In-clinic Visits
Time frame · From the date of the first study treatment up to the end of study, assessed up to 6 months
Unscheduled in-clinic visits were defined as visits that were originally intended to be conducted remotely but were ultimately carried out on-site, or visits that were not originally scheduled but took place on-site or at the local oncologist's (regional hospital). The total number of unscheduled in-clinic visits was evaluated
Number of Unscheduled In-clinic Visits Because of Safety Reasons
Time frame · From the date of the first study treatment up to the end of study, assessed up to 6 months
Unscheduled in-clinic visits were defined as visits that were originally intended to be conducted remotely but were ultimately carried out on-site, or visits that were not originally scheduled but took place on-site or at the local oncologist's (regional hospital). The total number of unscheduled in-clinic visits that were prompted by safety reasons was evaluated
Number of Unscheduled In-clinic Visits Per Participant in the Study
Time frame · From the date of the first study treatment up to the end of study, assessed up to 6 months
Unscheduled in-clinic visits were defined as visits that were originally intended to be conducted remotely but were ultimately carried out on-site, or visits that were not originally scheduled but took place on-site or at the local oncologist's (regional hospital). The total number of unscheduled in-clinic visits per participants was evaluated
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Treatment Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame · From the date of the first study treatment up to the end of treatment, assessed up to 6 months
An AE refers to any untoward medical occurrence, such as an unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory findings), symptom, or disease. The number of participants who discontinued the treatment due to adverse events was evaluated
Number of Participants With Dose Reductions/Interruptions for Alpelisib
Time frame · From the date of the first study treatment up to the end of treatment, assessed up to 6 months
Number of participants with dose reductions and interruptions for alpelisib
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)- Hyperglycemia, Rash and Diarrhea
Time frame · From the date of the first study treatment up to the end of study, assessed up to 6 months
AESIs (Adverse Events of Special Interest) are defined as events, whether serious or non-serious, that are of scientific and medical concern specific to the sponsor's product or program. These events may require ongoing monitoring and communication by the investigator to the sponsor. For this study, the following AESIs were defined: hyperglycemia, rash, and diarrhea. The number of participants experiencing these events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 was evaluated.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to In-clinic Visits
Time frame · From the date of the first study treatment up to the end of study, assessed up to 6 months
An AE refers to any untoward medical occurrence, such as an unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory findings), symptom, or disease. The number of participants with AEs per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 leading to in-clinic visits was assessed.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time frame · Baseline, and on Day 1 of Cycle 4, and 7 and end of treatment, assessed up to 6 months. Cycle= 28 days
The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire contained 30 items and was composed of both multi-item scales and single item measures. These included five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact), and a global health status/quality of life (QoL) scale. All of the scales and single items ranged from 0 to 100. A high scale score represented a higher response level. Thus, a high score for a functional scale indicated a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the QoL indicated high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/single item indicated a high level of symptomatology/problems. The EORTC QLQ-C30 scores for all functional and symptom scales were evaluated
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Time frame · Baseline, and on Day 1 of Cycle 4, and 7 and end of treatment, assessed up to 6 months. Cycle= 28 days
The 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of the 5 following dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Along with the five dimensions of health, the EQ-5D-5L includes a VAS where respondents rate their overall health status on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst possible health state and 100 represents the best possible health state. The EQ-5D-5L VAS scores were evaluated
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Scores
Time frame · Baseline, and on Day 1 of Cycle 4, and 7 and end of treatment, assessed up to 6 months. Cycle= 28 days
The BPI-SF was a questionnaire used to assess pain intensity and interference with daily activities. The Pain Severity Subscale included four questions asking individuals to rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain. The Pain Interference Subscale consisted of seven items that assessed how pain had interfered with activities, rated on the same scale. Both subscales had a total score range of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more significant pain or interference.
Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST 1.1
Time frame · Up to 6 months
The number of participants with PFS was defined as the count of participants who did not experience disease progression or death due to any cause during the study. Progression was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 based on local radiology review.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Score on a Scale) |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Fulvestrant | 99.5 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Fulvestrant | 1 |
| Group | Value (Visits) |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Fulvestrant | 0 |
| Group | Value (Visits) |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Fulvestrant | 0 |
| Group | Value (Visits per participant) |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Fulvestrant | 0 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Fulvestrant | 1 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Fulvestrant | 1 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Alpelisib + Fulvestrant | 1 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpelisib + FulvestrantParticipants were administered alpelisib at a daily dose of 300 mg for 12 cycles of 28 days and fulvestrant at a dose of 500 mg via intramuscular injection on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15, and Day 1 of each subsequent cycle up to Cycle 12. Pre-menopausal women also received goserelin at a dose of 3.6 mg on Day 1 of each cycle. | 0 / 2 | 0 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated