Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 2Registry data

Pen-Administered Low-Dose Dasiglucagon for Prevention and Treatment of Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 Diabetes

NCTNCT04764968 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other id77119Other idH-21000002Other id2020-005745-16

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen · Other
Design
Randomized · Open label (no masking)
Countries
1 country

Denmark

Start
27 Apr 2021
Primary completion
30 Dec 2021
Completion
28 Jan 2022
First posted
21 Feb 2021
Last update posted
7 Sept 2022
Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes · Hypoglycemia

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
202120222023
  1. Ph 2

    Pen-Administered Low-Dose Dasiglucagon for Prevention and Treatment of Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 Diabetes

    NCT04764968

    27 Apr 2021 to 28 Jan 2022

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and feasibility of outpatient-utilization of low-dose dasiglucagon administered via a multi-dose reusable pen injector in preventing and treating mild hypoglycemia in insulin pump-treated people with type 1 diabetes.

Interventions

  • DasiglucagonDrug

Arms2

  • No intervention

    Usual care

    During the 'usual care' period, participants will manage episodes of manifest or impending hypoglycemia as usual, e.g. through carbohydrate consumption or manual insulin pump suspension.

  • Experimental

    Dasiglucagon

    During the 'dasiglucagon' period, participants will use pen-administered low-dose (80 µg) dasiglucagon to treat or prevent episodes of hypoglycemia.

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Difference in percentage of time in range between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

    Registry description

    Sensor glucose level ≥ 3.9 mmol/l and ≤ 10.0 mmol/l

Secondary outcomes(13)
  1. Difference in percentage of time in hypoglycemia between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

    Registry description

    Sensor glucose level \< 3.9 mmol/l

  2. Difference in percentage of time in hyperglycemia between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

    Registry description

    Sensor glucose level \> 10 mmol/l

  3. Difference in coefficient of variation (%) between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

  4. Difference between successful cases (%) of hypoglycemia treatment between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

    Registry description

    Initial sensor glucose level ≥ 2.2 mmol/l and ≤ 3.9 mmol/l AND sensor glucose level \> 3.9 mmol/l 30 minutes post-treatment

  5. Difference in successful cases (%) of hypoglycemia treatment without subsequent hyperglycemia [sensor glucose level > 10 mmol/l during the first two hours post-treatment] between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

    Registry description

    Initial sensor glucose level ≥ 2.2 mmol/l and ≤ 3.9 mmol/l AND sensor glucose level \> 3.9 mmol/l 30 minutes post-treatment AND sensor glucose level ≤ 10 mmol/l during the first two hours post-treatment

  6. Difference in successful cases (%) of hypoglycemia prevention between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

    Registry description

    Initial sensor glucose level \> 3.9 mmol/l AND sensor glucose level \< 3.9 for ≤ 15 consecutive minutes during the first two hours post-treatment

  7. Difference in time from hypoglycemia treatment to euglycemia between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

    Registry description

    Minutes from initial sensor glucose level ≥ 2.2 mmol/l and ≤ 3.9 mmol/l to sensor glucose level ≥ 3.9 mmol/l

  8. Incidence rate of supplement carbohydrate administration during the first hour following dasiglucagon administration

    Time frame · 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

  9. Difference between the average daily carbohydrate intake between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

    Registry description

    Registered on the insulin pump

  10. Difference between the average total daily insulin dose between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

  11. Difference in the number and intensity of episodes with nausea, headache, stomach-ache, palpitations and injection site pain between the two study periods

    Time frame · 2-week 'usual care' period and 2-week 'dasiglucagon' period

    Registry description

    Intensity: mild/moderate/severe

  12. Percentage of participants scoring a favorable outcome on the patient-reported outcome questionnaire

    Time frame · At the end-of-study visit (estimated week 6)

    Registry description

    Scoring likely OR very likely on a four-point Likert scale

  13. Percentage of participants with treatment-induced or treatment-boosted anti-dasiglucagon antibodies

    Time frame · Measured 4 weeks after the 'dasiglucagon' period

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

No results are posted for this trial.

Completed trials do not always post results.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies1

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

1 study on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2023

7 results

Pen-administered low-dose dasiglucagon vs usual care for prevention and treatment of non-severe hypoglycaemia in people with type 1 diabetes during free-living conditions: a Phase II, randomised, open-label, two-period crossover trial.

Laugesen et al. 2023Diabetologiacited by 2

PMID 37037948PMC10244275DOI 10.1007/s00125-023-05909-4PUB-37037948

CC BY7 results

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years * T1D ≥ 2 years * Use of insulin pump therapy (without sensor-augmented insulin suspension/adjustment functionality) ≥ 6 months * Use of CGM (real-time or intermittently scanned) ≥ 3 months and ≥ 70% during the previous 14 days * HbA1c ≤ 70 mmol/l (8.5%) * Performs aerobic exercise on a regular basis (≥ 2 times per week; self-reported) and desires to exercise per American Diabetes Association guidelines (150 minutes per week) during the study. * Use of carbohydrate counting and bolus calculator (self-reported) * Sensor glucose level \< 3.9 mmol/l on ≥ 4/14 previous days assessed by CGM data Exclusion Criteria: * Use of anti-diabetic medicine (other than insulin), corticosteroids or other drugs affecting glucose metabolism during the study period and within 30 days prior to study start * Known or suspected allergies to glucagon or related products * History of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to dasiglucagon or any of the excipients * Patients with pheochromocytoma or insulinoma * Hypoglycemia unawareness * Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant or are not using adequate contraceptive methods * Inability to understand the individual information and to give informed consent * Current participation in another clinical trial that, in the judgment of the investigator, will compromise the results of the study or the safety of the subject * Concomitant medical or psychological conditions identified through review of medical history, physical examination and clinical laboratory analysis that, according to the investigator's assessment, makes the individual unsuitable for study participation

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.