Trial · Interventional
WithdrawnPhase 4Registry dataSupracondylar Distal Femur Fractures and Abaloparatide
This trial was withdrawn before it enrolled anyone.
Reason given at the registry: Study withdrawn due to staffing/enrollment related challenges.
Overview
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Enrollment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Sponsor
- Daniel Horwitz · Other
- Design
- Randomized · Quadruple masking
- Countries
1 country
United States
- Start
- Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Completion
- Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Nov 2020
- Last update posted
- 1 May 2024
- Conditions
- Femoral Fractures
Timeline
1 trial · 1 stopped early
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 4Withdrawn
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
Supracondylar femur fractures in the geriatric population present a unique challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon both in terms of fixation, healing, and final extremity axial alignment. Pulsed dosing of parathyroid hormone derivatives (Forteo) has been shown to increase bone mass, and several studies in Europe have demonstrated its benefit as an adjuvant for fracture healing. Abaloparatide represents a new compound which similarly offers great potential for accelerating fracture healing, especially healing associated with callous formation. This is a randomized, double blind placebo-controlled trial to compare a group of patients being treated for supracondylar distal femur fractures who receive abaloparatide (n=38) with a control group of patients who receive a placebo (n=38).
Interventions
- AbaloparatideDrug
- PlaceboDrug
Arms2
Experimental
Abaloparatide group
Patients in the experimental group will receive abaloparatide after their surgery.
Placebo comparator
Control group
Patients in the control group will receive a placebo after their surgery.
Primary outcomes2
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia Fractures (mRUST)
Time frame · 6 weeks
Registry description
degree of callous formation and healing (worst 4 - 16 best)
maintenance of axial alignment and loss of fixation
Time frame · 6 weeks
Registry description
change in the angle between the surface and fixed implant from the baseline radiographs (taken immediately postoperative) and the radiographs taken at 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperative
Secondary outcomes(4)
modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia Fractures (mRUST)
Time frame · 12 weeks
Registry description
degree of callous formation and healing (worst 4 - 16 best)
modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia Fractures (mRUST)
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
degree of callous formation and healing (worst 4 - 16 best)
maintenance of axial alignment and loss of fixation
Time frame · 12 weeks
Registry description
change in the angle between the surface and fixed implant from the baseline radiographs
maintenance of axial alignment and loss of fixation
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
change in the angle between the surface and fixed implant from the baseline radiographs
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- All
- Age
- from 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.