Trial · Interventional
Active, not recruitingPhase 2Registry dataAbaloparatide vs. Placebo in Post-Menopausal Women and Abaloparatide in Men Receiving Initial Spinal Fusion Surgery
Short name FAST-Healing
Overview
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 96 participants (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York · Other
- Design
- Randomized · Quadruple masking
- Countries
1 country
United States
- Start
- 14 Aug 2019
- Primary completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2019
- Last update posted
- 28 Sept 2026
- Conditions
- Spinal Fusion
Timeline
1 trial · 1 ongoing
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 2
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This is a prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2, 12-month pilot to study the efficacy of abaloparatide in postmenopausal women needing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. A total of 72 women with low bone mass who are scheduled to undergo spinal fusion surgery will be randomized 2:1 in a blinded fashion to receive either 80 mcg of abaloparatide subcutaneously (SC) every day or an identical-appearing placebo SC for 6 months. As well as a total of 24 men in an open-label design will be enrolled as an extension to this study. The total anticipated enrollment updated to 97. Outcomes include surgical outcomes at one year, pain, and fusion bone mass volume (FBMV) as a marker of bone union at 6 months and 1 year.
Interventions
- AbaloparatideDrug
- PlaceboDrug
Arms3
Active comparator
Abaloparatide (PM Women)
Abaloparatide 80 mcg dose administered subcutaneously with a pen once daily for 6 months
Placebo comparator
Placebo (PM Women)
Placebo administered subcutaneously with a pen once daily for 6 months
Experimental
Abaloparatide (Men)
Open-label treatment with Abaloparatide 80 mcg dose administered subcutaneously with a pen once daily for 6 months
Primary outcomes2
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Difference in measure of fusion mass bridging from transverse process to transverse process
Time frame · one year
Registry description
CT assessment of fusion mass using a qualitative five-point scale to assess fusion quality (1 = unfused, 2 = partial unilateral fusion, 3 = partial bilateral fusion, 4 = complete unilateral fusion, 5 = complete bilateral fusion)
Difference in incidence of adverse surgical outcomes
Time frame · one year
Registry description
Adverse outcomes include pedicle screw loosening, adjacent segment fracture and proximal junctional kyphosis will be evaluated on CT images
Secondary outcomes(2)
Pain assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame · 6 months
Registry description
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating more pain.
Pain assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index
Time frame · 6 months
Registry description
Oswestry Disability Index for low back pain with a score of 0 to 50 points or 0 to 100%. Higher scores indicate more pain.
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- All
- Age
- from 50 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.