Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry data

Study to Compare the Combination of Ribociclib Plus Goserelin Acetate With Hormonal Therapy Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Premenopausal or Perimenopausal Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

Short name RIGHT Choice

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
222 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Industry
Design
Randomized · Open label (no masking)
Countries
13 countries

Egypt, India, Jordan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), Vietnam

Start
25 Feb 2019
Primary completion
12 Apr 2022
Completion
10 May 2023
First posted
15 Feb 2019
Last update posted
9 Oct 2024
Conditions
Breast Cancer

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
201920202021202220232024
  1. Ph 2

    RIGHT Choice

    NCT03839823

    25 Feb 2019 to 10 May 2023

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

To compare the combination of Ribociclib plus goserelin acetate with hormonal therapy versus combination chemotherapy in premenopausal or perimenopausal patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Interventions

  • Docetaxel / CapecitabineCombination product
  • Capecitabine / VinorelbineCombination product
  • Paclitaxel / GemcitabineCombination product
  • RibociclibDrug
  • Letrozole OR AnastrozoleDrug
  • GoserelinDrug

Arms2

  • Experimental

    Ribociclib 600 mg

    Combination of non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor: NSAI (letrozole or anastrozole) + goserelin + ribociclib. 1. Ribociclib (600 mg) was dosed orally for the first 21 days out of a 28-day cycle. 2. Letrozole (2.5 mg) or anastrozole (1 mg) were dosed orally daily (28 days out of the 28-day cycle). 3. Goserelin (3.6 mg) was continuously released via a subcutaneous implant injected on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle (regardless of ribociclib treatment cycle) with an administration window of + 3 days.

  • Active comparator

    Combination Chemotherapy

    Combination chemotherapies of docetaxel/capecitabine, paclitaxel/gemcitabine or capecitabine/vinorelbine were administered to patients enrolled in the control group. The chemotherapy regimen was decided by the treating physician.

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Progression-free Survival

    Time frame · Up to approximately 34 months

    Registry description

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression as per local review and according to RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause. PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment if no PFS event was observed at the time of last patient, last visit (LPLV).

Secondary outcomes(10)
  1. Time to Treatment Failure

    Time frame · Up to approximately 34 months

    Registry description

    Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization/start of treatment to the earliest of date of progression, date of death due to any cause, change to other anti-cancer therapy, or date of discontinuation due to reasons other than 'Protocol violation' or 'Administrative problems'. Patients who did not achieve a confirmed PR or CR were censored at: the maximum follow-up time (i.e., LPLV - first patient first visit \[FPFV\] used for the analysis) for patients who had a PFS event (i.e., either progressed or died due to any cause); the last adequate tumor assessment date for all other patients.

  2. 3-month Treatment Failure Rate

    Time frame · Up to approximately 3 months

    Registry description

    Treatment failure rate was defined as the percentage of patients who discontinued the study treatment due to progressive disease, death due to any cause, change to other anti-cancer therapy, or discontinuation due to reasons other than protocol violation or administrative problems.

  3. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    Time frame · Up to approximately 34 months

    Registry description

    Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of patients with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR, response without image confirmation), as per local review and according to RECIST 1.1.

  4. Clinical Benefit Rate

    Time frame · Up to approximately 34 months

    Registry description

    Clinical benefit rate was defined as the percentage of patients with a BOR of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD, response without image confirmation) lasting 24 weeks or longer, as defined by RECIST 1.1.

  5. Time to Response

    Time frame · Up to approximately 34 months

    Registry description

    Time to response was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documented response of either CR or PR, which must be subsequently confirmed, as defined by RECIST 1.1. Patients who did not achieve a confirmed PR or CR were censored at: the maximum follow-up time (i.e., LPLV - FPFV used for the analysis) for patients who had a PFS event (i.e., either progressed or died due to any cause); the last adequate tumor assessment date for all other patients.

  6. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame · Up to approximately 46 months

    Registry description

    Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of LPLV, then OS was censored at the last contact date.

  7. Change From Baseline in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) Scale Score by Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) Questionnaire

    Time frame · Up to approximately 46 months

    Registry description

    FACT-B is a self-reported instrument that measures multidimensional quality of life (QOL) in patients with breast cancer. The FACT-B consists of 37 questions that address physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, with specific questions relevant to women with breast cancer. Each item has a score range of 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much), with a total score ranging from 0-148. The higher the score, the better the QOL reported by the participant. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in QoL.

  8. Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Categorized by Severity

    Time frame · Up to approximately 46 months

    Registry description

    Adverse events were assessed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 or higher. If CTCAE grading did not exist for an adverse event, the severity of mild, moderate, severe, and life-threatening, corresponding to Grades 1 - 4, were used. A patient with multiple severity grades for an AE was only counted under the maximum grade. Data for Grades 3 and 4 are reported.

  9. Number of Patients With Laboratory Abnormalities

    Time frame · Up to approximately 46 months

    Registry description

    Grading of laboratory values was assigned programmatically as per NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version available at the time of analysis. The calculation of CTCAE grades was based on the observed laboratory values only, clinical assessments were not be taken into account. CTCAE Grade 0 was assigned for all non-missing values not graded as 1 or higher. Grade 5 was not used. For laboratory tests where grades were not defined by CTCAE available at the time of analysis, results were categorized as low/normal/high based on laboratory normal ranges.

  10. Post-Hoc: All Collected Deaths

    Time frame · On-treatment deaths: Up to approximately 46 months. Post-treatment survival follow-up deaths: Up to approximately 2 additional months.

    Registry description

    On-treatment deaths due to any cause were collected from first dose of study medication to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. Post-treatment survival follow-up deaths were collected from day 31 after last dose of study medication to end of study.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeMedian· Up to approximately 34 months

Progression-free Survival

GroupValue (months)
Ribociclib 600 mg21.8
Combination Chemotherapy12.8
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeMedian· Up to approximately 34 months

Time to Treatment Failure

GroupValue (months)
Ribociclib 600 mg18.6
Combination Chemotherapy9.1
Secondary outcomeNumber· Up to approximately 3 months

3-month Treatment Failure Rate

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Ribociclib 600 mg11.6
Combination Chemotherapy21.8
Secondary outcomeNumber· Up to approximately 34 months

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Ribociclib 600 mg66.1
Combination Chemotherapy61.8
Secondary outcomeNumber· Up to approximately 34 months

Clinical Benefit Rate

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Ribociclib 600 mg81.3
Combination Chemotherapy74.5
Secondary outcomeMedian· Up to approximately 34 months

Time to Response

GroupValue (months)
Ribociclib 600 mg4.9
Combination Chemotherapy3.2
Secondary outcomeMedian· Up to approximately 46 months

Overall Survival (OS)

GroupValue (months)
Ribociclib 600 mgNA
Combination ChemotherapyNA
Secondary outcomeMean· Up to approximately 46 months

Change From Baseline in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) Scale Score by Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) Questionnaire

GroupValue (score on a scale)Spread
Ribociclib 600 mg4.313.45
Combination Chemotherapy4.815.33

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Ribociclib 600 mg (On-treatment)AEs during the on-treatment period (up to 30 days post-treatment)5 / 11217 / 112112 / 112
Combination Chemotherapy (On-treatment)AEs during the on-treatment period (up to 30 days post-treatment)0 / 10016 / 100100 / 100
Ribociclib 600 mg (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)Deaths collected in the post-treatment survival follow-up period (starting from Day 31 post-treatment). No AEs were collected during this period.29 / 1070 / 00 / 0
Combination Chemotherapy (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)Deaths collected in the post-treatment survival follow-up period (starting from Day 31 post-treatment). No AEs were collected during this period.29 / 920 / 00 / 0

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies1

Studies that cite this trial.

More studies

1 study on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2024

Final Results of RIGHT Choice: Ribociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Women With Clinically Aggressive Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.

Lu et al. 2024Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncologycited by 88

PMID 38771995PMC11315404DOI 10.1200/jco.24.00144PUB-38771995

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC-ND
Read at source

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
Female
Age
from 18 Years up to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
INCLUSION CRITERIA 1. Patient was an adult female ≥ 18 years old and \< 60 years old at the time of informed consent. 2. Patient had a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of estrogen-receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer based on the most recently analyzed tissue sample and all tested by local laboratory. ER should have been more than 10% ER positive or Allred ≥5 by local laboratory testing. 3. Patient had HER2-negative breast cancer defined as a negative in situ hybridization test or an IHC status of 0, 1 + or 2 + If IHC is 2 +, a negative in situ hybridization (FISH, CISH, or SISH) test was required by local laboratory testing and based on the most recently analyzed tissue sample. 4. Women with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer not amenable to curative therapy. Patients had to fulfill at least one of the following criteria to be considered that combination chemotherapy was needed according to PI's judgment. However, for patients who were eligible under inoperable locally advanced breast cancer or criteria 4c, the recruitment was stopped to enrich patient population with visceral metastases. * Symptomatic visceral metastases * Rapid progression of disease or impending visceral compromise. * Markedly symptomatic non-visceral disease if the treating physician opted to give chemotherapy for rapid palliation of patient's symptoms. 5. Patient was premenopausal or perimenopausal at the time of study entry. 1. Premenopausal status was defined as either: * Patient had last menstrual period within the last 12 months. OR * If on tamoxifen within the past 14 days, plasma estradiol and FSH were in the premenopausal range, according to local laboratory definition. * In case of therapy induced amenorrhea, plasma estradiol and/or FSH were in the premenopausal range according to local laboratory definition. * Patients who had undergone bilateral oophorectomy were not eligible. 2. Perimenopausal status was defined as neither premenopausal nor postmenopausal. 6. Patients had received neither prior hormonal therapy nor chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer, except LHRH agonist. Patients who received ≤ 14 days of tamoxifen or a NSAI (letrozole or anastrozole) with or without LHRH agonist for advanced breast cancer prior to randomization were eligible. Patient had measurable disease. EXCLUSION CRITERIA; 1. Patient received prior systemic anti-cancer therapy (including hormonal therapy and chemotherapy, or any CDK4/6 inhibitor for advanced breast cancer). * Patients who received (neo) adjuvant therapy for breast cancer were eligible. If the prior neo (adjuvant) therapy included aromatase inhibitors, the treatment-free interval must have been greater than 12 months from the completion of aromatase inhibitor treatment until randomization. * If patients had disease recurrence during adjuvant tamoxifen treatment, disease-free interval (defined as duration between the date of patient received complete tumor resection for primary breast cancer lesion to the date of disease recurrence documented) must have been greater than 12 months. * Patients who were receiving ≤ 14 days of tamoxifen or NSAI or LHRH agonists ≤ 28 days for advanced breast cancer prior to randomization were eligible. 2. Patient had received extended-field radiotherapy ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomization or limited field radiotherapy ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomization, and had not recovered to grade 1 or better from related side effects of such therapy (with the exception of alopecia or other toxicities not considered a safety risk for the patient at investigator's discretion). Patient from whom ≥ 25% of the bone marrow had been previously irradiated were also excluded. 3. Patient had a concurrent malignancy or malignancy within 3 years of randomization, with the exception of adequately treated, basal or squamous cell skin carcinoma or curatively resected cervical cancer in situ. 4. Patients who had lung metastases with oxygen demand in resting status. 5. Patients who had liver metastases with bilirubin \> 1.5 ULN. 6. Patients with CNS involvement unless they met ALL of the following criteria: * At least 4 weeks from prior therapy completion (including radiation and/or surgery) to starting the study treatment. * Clinically stable CNS tumor at the time of screening and not receiving steroids and/or enzyme inducing anti-epileptic medications for brain metastases. * Leptomeningeal metastases was not allowed, even with stable clinical condition.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.