Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Sentinel | 11 |
| Randomized Vosoritide | 32 |
| Randomized Placebo | 32 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry dataUnited States, Australia, Japan, United Kingdom
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BMN 111 in Infants and Young Children With Achondroplasia
NCT0358369713 Jun 2018 to 26 Jan 2022
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
Study 111-206 is a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of BMN 111 in infants and young children with a diagnosis of achondroplasia.
Experimental
Active BMN111
Subcutaneous injection of 15 μg/kg/day and/or 30 μg/kg/day of BMN111 daily.
Placebo comparator
Placebo
Daily subcutaneous injection of placebo
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame · Up to Week 56 (Safety Follow-Up +/-7d)
A treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any Adverse Events that newly appeared, increased in frequency or worsened in severity following initiation of study drug administration. A severity grade was defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. As per CTCAE, Grade 1 scales as Mild; Grade 2 scales as Moderate; Grade 3 scales as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4 scales as life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5 scales as death related to AE. Safety Population includes all sentinel and randomized participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of vosoritide or placebo in this study. Serious adverse event (SAE)
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score at Week 52.
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
Z-Scores were derived using age-sex specific reference data (means and SDS) for average stature children per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A height Z score of 0 would indicate that the subject's height is equal to the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. A positive height Z score indicates that the subjects height is above the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age, whilst a negative height Z score indicates that the subjects height is below the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. To conclude if the height Z score increases then this means the height deficit has decreased. standard deviation score (SDS). The primary efficacy analysis population was the subset of randomized participants in the FAS.
Change From Baseline in Height at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
As a general rule, standing height/sitting height was used if participants were aged \>= 24 months at baseline. Body length/crown to rump was used if participants were aged \< 24 months at baseline. If body length was not measured and standing height was available, standing height was used.
Change From Baseline in Annualized Growth Velocity (AGV) at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
AGV was derived over 12-month intervals starting from the baseline visit. Annualized growth velocity (AGV) = Standing Height at Date 2 - Standing Height at Date 1/Interval Length (Days) x 365.25. Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.
Change From Baseline in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
Upper to Lower Body ratio=Sitting Height / (Standing Height - Sitting Height).
Change From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
Change from baseline in other growth measures (upper body length, head circumference, arm span, upper arm length, lower arm (Forearm) length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length (Thigh), knee to heel length, and tibial length) at Week 52. Participants aged \<24 months, body length and crown to rump length take precedence over standing height and sitting height. Participants aged \<24 months at baseline and \>=24 months at Week 52, body length and crown to rump length take precedence.
Change From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
For Height: subjects aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Subjects aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
Body Mass Index (BMI): For height used for BMI calculation, participants aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Participants aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.
Change From Baseline in BMI Z-score at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
The body mass index (BMI) Z-score represents the participant's BMI converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean BMI for age and sex of the reference population. A positive BMI Z-score means BMI is above the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative BMI Z-Score means BMI is below the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age. BMI Z-scores are derived only for participants aged 24 months or older, the change from baseline to Week 52 in BMI Z-score is summarized for Cohort 1 only as no participants in Cohort 2 or Cohort 3 were 24 months at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
The weight Z-score represents the participant's weight converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean weight for age and sex of the reference population. A positive weight Z-score means weight is above the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative weight Z-Score means weight is below the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age.
Change From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health).
Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Behavior Scores at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Global Behavior Scores at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global behaviour. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Getting On With Other Score at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global health perceptions. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo and Cohort 3 vosoritide are 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Health Score at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global change in health. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.
Change From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
The Pediatric Functional Independence Measure-II (WeeFIM®-II) is designed to measure functional independence of children between the ages of 6 months \& 18 yrs who have physical or general developmental limitations. The WeeFIM-II is comprised of 3 domains that are rated by clinicians based on information obtained from parents/caregivers (self-care \[score range 8 to 56\], mobility \[score range 8 to 35\], \& cognition \[score range 8 to 35\]) \& provides a total score between 18 (worst) \& 126 (Best). Higher score reflects higher level of independence. Performance of a child on each of individual items within WeeFIM is assigned to one of seven levels on an ordinal scale that represent function from complete \& modified independence (levels 7 \& 6) without a helping person to modified \& complete dependence (levels 5 to 1) with a helping person. Functional Independence Measure (Wee-FIM-II) is only validated in children ages 6 months to 18 yrs. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.
Change From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
BSID-III is performance-based clinician-reported outcome assessment for use in children from 1 to 42 months (1 month to 3.5 years). individually administered by the trained clinician to the participant/child Scales include Cognitive subscale, Receptive and Expressive subscales, and Gross and Fine Motor subscales. The two language scales make up a composite Language Scale score and the Gross and Fine Motor subscales yield a composite Motor Scale score. In addition, there is a Social-Emotional Scale and Adaptive Behavior Scale, which is a questionnaire read and completed by parent or caregiver. Scores range from 0 to 2, and indicate mastery (2), emerging (1) or zero (not present) Each (sub)scale yields a total raw score, standardized according to the participant's chronological age (scaled scores)
Change From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
The CBCL is used as a screening tool for emotional or behavioral problems, measuring initial behavior severity, tracking changes in behavioral problems over the course of treatment, and treatment planning. The CBCL 1.5-5 years old consists of 100 questions, scored on a three-point Likert scale (0=Not True (as far as you know), 1= Somewhat or Sometimes True, 2=Very True or Often True). The scores for each individual question within a domain are summed to give a domain score. The CBCL uses a normative sample to create standard scores, which are scaled so that 50 is average with a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate more emotional or behavioral issues. CBCL was waived for children \< 18 months old. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.
Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left/Right Tibia Bowing Angle at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio and Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52 End point timeframe:
Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio & Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52
Time frame · Baseline to Week 52
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Sentinel | 11 |
| Randomized Vosoritide | 32 |
| Randomized Placebo | 32 |
| Group | Value (Z-score) |
|---|---|
| Randomized Vosoritide | -0.06 |
| Randomized Placebo | -0.31 |
| All Vosoritide | 0.01 |
| Placebo | -0.30 |
| Group | Value (cm) |
|---|---|
| Randomized Vosoritide | 8.15 |
| Randomized Placebo | 7.38 |
| All Vosoritide | 8.41 |
| Placebo | 7.45 |
| Group | Value (cm/year) |
|---|---|
| Randomized Vosoritide | -2.17 |
| Randomized Placebo | -2.95 |
| All Vosoritide | -2.41 |
| Placebo | -3.32 |
| Group | Value (Ratio) |
|---|---|
| Randomized Vosoritide | -0.20 |
| Randomized Placebo | -0.13 |
| All Vosoritide | -0.19 |
| Placebo | -0.13 |
| Group | Value (cm) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Placebo | 3.04 | 1.52 |
| Cohort 1: Vosoritide | 3.54 | 1.81 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | 5.45 | 1.75 |
| Cohort 2: Vosoritide | 5.20 | 1.50 |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | 6.58 | 0.99 |
| Cohort 3: Vosoritide | 6.75 | 0.86 |
| Group | Value (Ratio) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Placebo | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| Cohort 1: Vosoritide | 0.00 | 0.12 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | -0.09 | 0.06 |
| Cohort 2: Vosoritide | 0.01 | 0.10 |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | 0.02 | 0.11 |
| Cohort 3: Vosoritide | -0.01 | 0.12 |
| Group | Value (kg/m^2) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Placebo | 0.20 | 1.34 |
| Cohort 1: Vosoritide | -0.45 | 0.94 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | 0.55 | 1.17 |
| Cohort 2: Vosoritide | 0.08 | 0.75 |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | 0.74 | 1.70 |
| Cohort 3: Vosoritide | 0.94 | 1.42 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| PlaceboPlacebo: Participants who received placebo single daily subcutaneous injection. | 0 / 32 | 6 / 32 | 32 / 32 |
| VosoritideAll Vosoritide : 11 sentinel + 32 randomized participants who received vosoritide 15 µg/kg/day or 30 µg/kg/day, single daily subcutaneous injection. | 1 / 43 | 3 / 43 | 43 / 43 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
2 studies on this page
PubMed tag: none · 2026
Irving et al. 2026Journal of the Endocrine Societycited by 1
PMID 41783511PMC12954483DOI 10.1210/jendso/bvag008PUB-41783511
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2024
Savarirayan et al. 2024The Lancet. Child & adolescent healthcited by 59
PMID 37984383DOI 10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00265-1PUB-37984383
PubMed tag: none · 2024
Qi et al. 2024Clinical pharmacokinetics
PMID 38649657PMC11106139DOI 10.1007/s40262-024-01371-6PUB-38649657
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated