Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry data

A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BMN 111 in Infants and Young Children With Achondroplasia

NCTNCT03583697 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other id111-206Other id2016-003826-18Other id2016

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)
Sponsor
BioMarin Pharmaceutical · Industry
Design
Randomized · Quadruple masking
Countries
4 countries

United States, Australia, Japan, United Kingdom

Start
13 Jun 2018
Primary completion
26 Jan 2022
Completion
26 Jan 2022
First posted
11 Jul 2018
Last update posted
13 Jun 2024
Conditions
Achondroplasia

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
201820192020202120222023
  1. Ph 2

    A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BMN 111 in Infants and Young Children With Achondroplasia

    NCT03583697

    13 Jun 2018 to 26 Jan 2022

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

Study 111-206 is a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of BMN 111 in infants and young children with a diagnosis of achondroplasia.

Interventions

  • BMN 111Drug
  • PlaceboDrug

Arms2

  • Experimental

    Active BMN111

    Subcutaneous injection of 15 μg/kg/day and/or 30 μg/kg/day of BMN111 daily.

  • Placebo comparator

    Placebo

    Daily subcutaneous injection of placebo

Primary outcomes2

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Time frame · Up to Week 56 (Safety Follow-Up +/-7d)

    Registry description

    A treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any Adverse Events that newly appeared, increased in frequency or worsened in severity following initiation of study drug administration. A severity grade was defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. As per CTCAE, Grade 1 scales as Mild; Grade 2 scales as Moderate; Grade 3 scales as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4 scales as life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5 scales as death related to AE. Safety Population includes all sentinel and randomized participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of vosoritide or placebo in this study. Serious adverse event (SAE)

  2. Change From Baseline in Height Z-score at Week 52.

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    Z-Scores were derived using age-sex specific reference data (means and SDS) for average stature children per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A height Z score of 0 would indicate that the subject's height is equal to the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. A positive height Z score indicates that the subjects height is above the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age, whilst a negative height Z score indicates that the subjects height is below the mean height for the average stature population of the same sex and age. To conclude if the height Z score increases then this means the height deficit has decreased. standard deviation score (SDS). The primary efficacy analysis population was the subset of randomized participants in the FAS.

Secondary outcomes(20)
  1. Change From Baseline in Height at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    As a general rule, standing height/sitting height was used if participants were aged \>= 24 months at baseline. Body length/crown to rump was used if participants were aged \< 24 months at baseline. If body length was not measured and standing height was available, standing height was used.

  2. Change From Baseline in Annualized Growth Velocity (AGV) at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    AGV was derived over 12-month intervals starting from the baseline visit. Annualized growth velocity (AGV) = Standing Height at Date 2 - Standing Height at Date 1/Interval Length (Days) x 365.25. Difference in LS means were obtained from an analysis of covariance model.

  3. Change From Baseline in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    Upper to Lower Body ratio=Sitting Height / (Standing Height - Sitting Height).

  4. Change From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in other growth measures (upper body length, head circumference, arm span, upper arm length, lower arm (Forearm) length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length (Thigh), knee to heel length, and tibial length) at Week 52. Participants aged \<24 months, body length and crown to rump length take precedence over standing height and sitting height. Participants aged \<24 months at baseline and \>=24 months at Week 52, body length and crown to rump length take precedence.

  5. Change From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    For Height: subjects aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Subjects aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.

  6. Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    Body Mass Index (BMI): For height used for BMI calculation, participants aged \< 24 months, body length takes precedence over standing height. Participants aged \< 24 months at baseline and \>= 24 months at Week 52, body length takes precedence.

  7. Change From Baseline in BMI Z-score at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    The body mass index (BMI) Z-score represents the participant's BMI converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean BMI for age and sex of the reference population. A positive BMI Z-score means BMI is above the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative BMI Z-Score means BMI is below the mean BMI for the average stature population of the same sex and age. BMI Z-scores are derived only for participants aged 24 months or older, the change from baseline to Week 52 in BMI Z-score is summarized for Cohort 1 only as no participants in Cohort 2 or Cohort 3 were 24 months at baseline.

  8. Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    The weight Z-score represents the participant's weight converted to an age and sex appropriate standard deviation score (SDS) by comparison with an average stature reference population. The weight Z-score of 0 represents the mean weight for age and sex of the reference population. A positive weight Z-score means weight is above the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age and a negative weight Z-Score means weight is below the mean weight for the average stature population of the same sex and age.

  9. Change From Baseline in Infant Toddler Quality of Life (ITQoL) Scores at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health).

  10. Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Behavior Scores at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.

  11. Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Global Behavior Scores at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global behaviour. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.

  12. Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Getting On With Other Score at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global health perceptions. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo and Cohort 3 vosoritide are 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.

  13. Change From Baseline in ITQoL-Health Score at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    97(ITQOL) item full-length version was used. For each concept, item responses are scored, summed, \& transformed on a scale from 0(worst health) to 100(best health). A higher score indicates better global change in health. The number of subjects assessed in Cohort 3 Placebo is 0 as assessment was not done or overall score could not be derived because no more than half assessments were done at Screening/ baseline. Hence, Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) are not applicable. Note: For each variable, there are different numbers of individual questions. The variable can only be derived if at least half of the questions were completed.

  14. Change From Baseline in Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM-II) Score at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    The Pediatric Functional Independence Measure-II (WeeFIM®-II) is designed to measure functional independence of children between the ages of 6 months \& 18 yrs who have physical or general developmental limitations. The WeeFIM-II is comprised of 3 domains that are rated by clinicians based on information obtained from parents/caregivers (self-care \[score range 8 to 56\], mobility \[score range 8 to 35\], \& cognition \[score range 8 to 35\]) \& provides a total score between 18 (worst) \& 126 (Best). Higher score reflects higher level of independence. Performance of a child on each of individual items within WeeFIM is assigned to one of seven levels on an ordinal scale that represent function from complete \& modified independence (levels 7 \& 6) without a helping person to modified \& complete dependence (levels 5 to 1) with a helping person. Functional Independence Measure (Wee-FIM-II) is only validated in children ages 6 months to 18 yrs. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.

  15. Change From Baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III) Scores at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    BSID-III is performance-based clinician-reported outcome assessment for use in children from 1 to 42 months (1 month to 3.5 years). individually administered by the trained clinician to the participant/child Scales include Cognitive subscale, Receptive and Expressive subscales, and Gross and Fine Motor subscales. The two language scales make up a composite Language Scale score and the Gross and Fine Motor subscales yield a composite Motor Scale score. In addition, there is a Social-Emotional Scale and Adaptive Behavior Scale, which is a questionnaire read and completed by parent or caregiver. Scores range from 0 to 2, and indicate mastery (2), emerging (1) or zero (not present) Each (sub)scale yields a total raw score, standardized according to the participant's chronological age (scaled scores)

  16. Change From Baseline in Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

    Registry description

    The CBCL is used as a screening tool for emotional or behavioral problems, measuring initial behavior severity, tracking changes in behavioral problems over the course of treatment, and treatment planning. The CBCL 1.5-5 years old consists of 100 questions, scored on a three-point Likert scale (0=Not True (as far as you know), 1= Somewhat or Sometimes True, 2=Very True or Often True). The scores for each individual question within a domain are summed to give a domain score. The CBCL uses a normative sample to create standard scores, which are scaled so that 50 is average with a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores indicate more emotional or behavioral issues. CBCL was waived for children \< 18 months old. Therefore results for Cohort 3 is not summarized.

  17. Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Lower Extremities at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

  18. Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left/Right Tibia Bowing Angle at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

  19. Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio and Right Femur Length (cm) to Tibia Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52 End point timeframe:

  20. Change From Baseline in Bilateral X-rays of Left Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio & Right Tibia Length (cm) to Fibula Length (cm) Ratio at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline to Week 52

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeCount of participants· Up to Week 56 (Safety Follow-Up +/-7d)

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity Grade and Study Drug Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

GroupValue (Participants)
Sentinel11
Randomized Vosoritide32
Randomized Placebo32
Primary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline to Week 52

Change From Baseline in Height Z-score at Week 52.

GroupValue (Z-score)
Randomized Vosoritide-0.06
Randomized Placebo-0.31
All Vosoritide0.01
Placebo-0.30
Secondary and other outcome results(6)
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline to Week 52

Change From Baseline in Height at Week 52

GroupValue (cm)
Randomized Vosoritide8.15
Randomized Placebo7.38
All Vosoritide8.41
Placebo7.45
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline to Week 52

Change From Baseline in Annualized Growth Velocity (AGV) at Week 52

GroupValue (cm/year)
Randomized Vosoritide-2.17
Randomized Placebo-2.95
All Vosoritide-2.41
Placebo-3.32
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline to Week 52

Change From Baseline in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio at Week 52

GroupValue (Ratio)
Randomized Vosoritide-0.20
Randomized Placebo-0.13
All Vosoritide-0.19
Placebo-0.13
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline to Week 52

Change From Baseline in Other Growth Measures (Upper Body Length, Head Circumference, Arm Span, Upper Arm Length, Lower Arm Length, Lower Body Length, Upper Leg Length, Knee to Heel Length, and Tibial Length) at Week 52

GroupValue (cm)Spread
Cohort 1: Placebo3.041.52
Cohort 1: Vosoritide3.541.81
Cohort 2: Placebo5.451.75
Cohort 2: Vosoritide5.201.50
Cohort 3: Placebo6.580.99
Cohort 3: Vosoritide6.750.86
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline to Week 52

Change From Baseline in Other Body Proportion Ratios (Arm Span to Height Ratio, Upper Arm Length to Lower Arm [Forearm] Length Ratio, Upper Leg Length [Thigh] to Knee to Heel Length Ratio, and Upper Leg Length (Thigh) to Tibial Length Ratio) at Week 52

GroupValue (Ratio)Spread
Cohort 1: Placebo0.050.15
Cohort 1: Vosoritide0.000.12
Cohort 2: Placebo-0.090.06
Cohort 2: Vosoritide0.010.10
Cohort 3: Placebo0.020.11
Cohort 3: Vosoritide-0.010.12
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline to Week 52

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 52

GroupValue (kg/m^2)Spread
Cohort 1: Placebo0.201.34
Cohort 1: Vosoritide-0.450.94
Cohort 2: Placebo0.551.17
Cohort 2: Vosoritide0.080.75
Cohort 3: Placebo0.741.70
Cohort 3: Vosoritide0.941.42

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
PlaceboPlacebo: Participants who received placebo single daily subcutaneous injection.0 / 326 / 3232 / 32
VosoritideAll Vosoritide : 11 sentinel + 32 randomized participants who received vosoritide 15 µg/kg/day or 30 µg/kg/day, single daily subcutaneous injection.1 / 433 / 4343 / 43

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies3

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

2 studies on this page

PubMed tag: none · 2026

7 results

Effect of vosoritide on spine morphology in children with achondroplasia: 1-year results from a randomized phase 2 study.

Irving et al. 2026Journal of the Endocrine Societycited by 1

PMID 41783511PMC12954483DOI 10.1210/jendso/bvag008PUB-41783511

CC BY7 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2024

9 results

Vosoritide therapy in children with achondroplasia aged 3-59 months: a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Savarirayan et al. 2024The Lancet. Child & adolescent healthcited by 59

PMID 37984383DOI 10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00265-1PUB-37984383

Full text at the publisher9 results

PubMed tag: none · 2024

Development of a Weight-Band Dosing Approach for Vosoritide in Children with Achondroplasia Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model.

Qi et al. 2024Clinical pharmacokinetics

PMID 38649657PMC11106139DOI 10.1007/s40262-024-01371-6PUB-38649657

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC
Read at source

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
up to 59 Months
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosis of achondroplasia (ACH), confirmed by genetic testing. If subjects had previous genetic testing, subjects must have a lab report from a certified laboratory with the study specific mutation documented. 2. Age 0 to \< 60 months, at study entry (Day 1) 3. Cohort 1 and 2 subjects must have at least a 6-month period of pretreatment growth assessment in Study 111 901 immediately before screening, and have one documented measurement of height/body length a minimum of 6 months prior to the screening visit for 111-206. Cohort 3 subjects must have a minimum of 3 months of observation prior to treatment. This observational period can be obtained either (1) via prior enrollment in Study 111-901 or (2) via enrollment in this Study 111 206 for a minimum of 3 months of non-treatment observation prior to commencement of treatment. 4. Parent(s) or guardian(s) (and the subjects themselves, if required by local regulations or ethics committee) are willing and able to provide written, signed informed consent after the nature of the study has been explained and prior to performance of any research-related procedure 5. Willing and able to perform all study procedures as physically possible 6. Parent(s) or caregiver(s) are willing to administer daily injections to the subjects and complete the required training Exclusion Criteria: 1. Have hypochondroplasia or short-stature condition other than achondroplasia (e.g., trisomy 21, pseudoachondroplasia, etc.) 2. Subject weighs \< 5.0 kg (Cohort 1 and 2) or \< 4.0 kg (Cohort 3) 3. Have any of the following: * Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism * Insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus * Autoimmune inflammatory disease (including celiac disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile dermatomyositis, scleroderma, etc.) * Inflammatory bowel disease * Autonomic neuropathy 4. Have a history of any of the following: * Renal insufficiency defined as serum creatinine \> 2 mg/dL * Chronic anemia or Hgb \<10.0 g/dL (based on screening clinical laboratory testing) * Baseline systolic blood pressure (BP) below age and gender specified normal range or recurrent symptomatic hypotension (defined as episodes of low BP generally accompanied by symptoms e.g., dizziness, fainting) or recurrent symptomatic orthostatic hypotension * Cardiac or vascular disease, including the following * Cardiac dysfunction (abnormal echocardiogram determined to be clinically significant by principal investigator PI and medical monitor) at Screening Visit * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy * Pulmonary hypertension * Congenital heart disease with ongoing cardiac dysfunction * Cerebrovascular disease * Aortic insufficiency or other clinically significant valvular dysfunction * Clinically significant atrial or ventricular arrhythmias 5. Have a clinically significant finding or arrhythmia that indicates abnormal cardiac function or conduction or Fridericia's corrected QT interval (QTc-F) \>450 msec on screening ECG 6. Have evidence of cervicomedullary compression (CMC) likely to require surgical intervention within 60 days of Screening as determined by the Investigator based on the following assessments * Physical exam (e.g., neurologic findings of clonus, opisthotonus, exaggerated reflexes, dilated facial veins) * Polysomnography (e.g., severe central sleep apnea) * MRI indicating presence of severe CMC or spinal cord damage 7. Have an unstable medical condition likely to require surgical intervention in the next 6 months, or planned spine or long-bone surgery (i.e., surgery involving significant disruption of bone cortex) during the study period 8. Have documented uncorrected Vitamin D deficiency: 25(OH)D \<=15 ng/mL (37.5 nmol/L) 9. Require any other investigational product prior to completion of the study period 10. Have received another investigational product or investigational medical device within 30 days prior to the Screening visit 11. Have used any other investigational product or investigational medical device for the treatment of achondroplasia or short stature at any time 12. Require current chronic therapy with antihypertensive medication or any medication that, in the investigator's judgment, may compromise the safety or ability of the subject to participate in this clinical study (Table 9.3.5.1) 13. Have been treated with growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), or anabolic steroids in the 6 months prior to screening, or long-term treatment (\>3 months) at any time 14. Have had regular long-term treatment (\> 1 month) with oral corticosteroids (low-dose ongoing inhaled steroid for asthma, or intranasal steroids, are acceptable) in the 12 months prior to screening 15. Have ever had cervicomedullary decompression surgery (Cohorts 2 and 3 only), spine or long-bone surgery (i.e., surgery involving disruption of bone cortex) or have ever had bone-related surgery with chronic complications NOTE: Subjects with prior cervicomedullary decompression may be allowed into Cohort 1 only after discussion and agreement with Medical Monitor. 16. Have ever had limb-lengthening surgery or plan to have limb-lengthening surgery during the study period 17. Have had a fracture of the long bones or spine within 6 months prior to screening 18. Have aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or total bilirubin greater than upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening (except for subjects with a known history of Gilberts or newborns entering screening in Cohort 3) 19. Have evidence of severe untreated sleep apnea; or have newly initiated sleep apnea treatment (eg, Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or sleep apnea-mitigating surgery) in the 2 months prior to screening 20. Have current malignancy, history of malignancy, or currently under work-up for suspected malignancy 21. Have known hypersensitivity to BMN 111 or its excipients 22. Have a history of hip surgery or severe hip dysplasia 23. Have a history of clinically significant hip injury in the 30 days prior to screening 24. Have a history of slipped capital femoral epiphysis or avascular necrosis of the femoral head 25. Have abnormal findings on baseline clinical hip exam or imaging assessments that are determined to be clinically significant as determined by the Investigator 26. Have a condition or circumstance that, in the view of the Investigator, places the subject at high risk for poor treatment compliance or for not completing the study 27. Have any concurrent disease or condition that, in the view of the Investigator, would interfere with study participation or safety evaluations, for any reason Inclusion Criteria for Cohort 3 Observation Period 1. Parent(s) or guardian(s) willing and able to provide signed informed consent after the nature of the study has been explained and prior to performance of any research-related procedure. Also, willing and able to provide written assent (if applicable) after the nature of the study has been explained and prior to performance of any research-related procedure. 2. Birth to \<= 3 months of age at study entry. 3. Have ACH, documented by genetic testing 4. Are willing and able to perform all study procedures as physically possible Exclusion Criteria for Cohort 3 Observation Period 1. Have hypochondroplasia or short stature condition other than ACH (e.g., trisomy 21, pseudoachondroplasia) 2. Have any of the following disorders: * Hypothyroidism * Insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus * Autoimmune inflammatory disease (including celiac disease, lupus (SLE), juvenile dermatomyositis, scleroderma, and others) * Inflammatory bowel disease * Autonomic neuropathy 3. Have an unstable clinical condition likely to lead to intervention during the course of the study, including progressive cervical medullary compression 4. Have a history of any of the following: * Renal insufficiency * Anemia 5. Have a history of cardiac or vascular disease, including the following: * Cardiac dysfunction * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy * Congenital heart disease * Cerebrovascular disease, aortic insufficiency * Clinically significant atrial or ventricular arrhythmias 6. Current treatment with antihypertensive medications, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, cardiac glycosides, systemic anticholinergic agents, any medication that may impair or enhance compensatory tachycardia, drugs known to alter renal function that is expected to continue for the duration of the study 7. Have had regular long-term treatment (\> 1 month) with oral corticosteroids (low-dose ongoing inhaled steroid for asthma is acceptable) in the previous 3 month 8. Concomitant medication that prolongs the QT/QTc interval within 14 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before the Screening visit 9. Have used any other investigational product or investigational medical device for the treatment of ACH or short stature 10. Planned or expected bone-related surgery (ie. surgery involving disruption of bone cortex), during the study period. 11. Planned or expected to have limb-lengthening surgery during the study period. 12. Have any condition that, in the view of the Investigator, places the subject at high risk of poor compliance with the visit schedule or of not completing the study. 13. Concurrent disease or condition that, in the view of the Investigator, would interfere with study participation

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.