Trial · Interventional
Status unknownPhase 4Registry dataAromatase Plus GnRH Analogue Versus GnRH Analog Alone in Adenomyosis
Overview
- Status
- Status unknown
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Enrollment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Centre for Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Italy · Network
- Design
- Randomized · Double masking
- Countries
3 countries
Albania, Bulgaria, Italy
- Start
- 1 Dec 2017
- Primary completion
- 30 Sept 2024 (estimated)
- Completion
- 30 Sept 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2018
- Last update posted
- 6 Mar 2024
- Conditions
- Uterine Adenomyosis · Recurrent Implantation Failure · Menstrual Pain
Timeline
1 trial
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 4
Aromatase Plus GnRH Analogue Versus GnRH Analog Alone in Adenomyosis
NCT034216391 Dec 2017 to est. 30 Sept 2024
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
With this study the investigators want to test which is the best medical treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis affecting women undergoing IVF and with previous implantation failure, between Aromatase inhibitor plus GnRH analog versus GnRH alone, in term pregnancy rate and uterine volume reduction.
Interventions
- GnRH analog (11.25mg Leuprolide acetate)Drug
- Aromatase inhibitor and GnRH analogDrug
- Aromatase and GnRH analog (11.25mg Leuprolide acetate)Drug
Arms2
Active comparator
GnRH analog alone
control group treated with GnRH analog alone
Experimental
Aromatase inhibitor plus GnRH analog
experimental group treated with aromatase inhibitor plus GnRH analog
Primary outcomes1
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
pregnancy after embryo transfer
Time frame · 12 months
Registry description
after treatment patients undergo embryo transfer of a cryopreservad blastocyst
Secondary outcomes(1)
uterine volume reduction
Time frame · 12 months
Registry description
differences in uterine volume pre and post treatment evaluated by ultrasound
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- from 30 Years up to 45 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.