Number of Participants With Eligard Related Adverse Events (AE)
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg | 15 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 4Results postedRegistry dataHong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
A Study of ELIGARD® in Hormone-dependent Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT0303503223 Jun 2017 to 19 Nov 2019
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of ELIGARD® in ethnic Asian prostate cancer patients.
Experimental
Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 milligrams (mg)
Participants received 22.5 mg of leuprolide acetate (eligard) by subcutaneous injection at baseline, month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Number of Participants With Eligard Related Adverse Events (AE)
Time frame · From first dose of study drug up to 18 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or had undergone study procedures that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE was considered to be serious if, in the view of either the investigator or sponsor, it resulted in any of the following outcomes: resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect, required inpatient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization, other medically important events. Drug-related AEs are AEs where causal relationships were at least a reasonable possibility as determined by the investigator.
Percentage of Participants With Testosterone Levels Less Than (<) 20, 20-50 and Greater Than (>) 50 Nanogram Per Deciliter (ng/dL) at Month 12
Time frame · Month 12
Testosterone level was summarized based on the percentage of participants with \< 20 ng/dL, 20 to 50 ng/dL and \> 50 ng/dL.
Percentage of Participants With Testosterone Levels < 20, 20-50 and > 50 ng/dL at Month 18
Time frame · Month 18
Testosterone level was summarized based on the percentage of participants with \< 20 ng/dL, 20 to 50 ng/dL and \> 50 ng/dL.
Time to PSA Progression
Time frame · From first dose of study drug up to PSA progression (18 months)
Time to PSA progression was defined as (date of ≥25 percentage (%) increase and ≥ 2 ng/mL absolute increase) - (date of first administration of ELIGARD 22.5 mg)/30, where PSA progression was defiined as 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL, and confirmed by a second value at least 3 weeks later. Participants with more than 1 qualifying PSA progression were counted only once, and the earlier progression was accounted for time to progression analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 30% PSA Percent Reduction From Baseline at Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18
Time frame · Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18
PSA percent reduction (%) = (\[PSA tested- baseline PSA\]/baseline PSA)\*100%. PSA level was summarized based on time to PSA progression and PSA percent reduction by ≥ 30% with respect to the level at baseline. Participants with more than 1 qualifying PSA progression were counted only once, and the earlier progression was accounted for time to progression analysis. PSA progression was defined as 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL), and confirmed by a second value at least 3 weeks later.
Percentage of Participants With ≥50% PSA Percent Reduction From Baseline at Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18
Time frame · Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18
PSA percent reduction (%) = (\[PSA tested- baseline PSA\]/baseline PSA)\*100%. PSA level was summarized based on time to PSA progression and PSA percent reduction by ≥ 50% with respect to the level at baseline. Participants with more than 1 qualifying PSA progression were counted only once, and the earlier progression was accounted for time to progression analysis. PSA progression was defined as 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL, and confirmed by a second value at least 3 weeks later.
Percentage of Participants With ≥90% PSA Percent Reduction From Baseline at Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18
Time frame · Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18
PSA percent reduction (%) = (\[PSA tested- baseline PSA\]/baseline PSA)\*100%. PSA level was summarized based on time to PSA progression and PSA percent reduction by ≥ 90%, with respect to the level at baseline. Participants with more than 1 qualifying PSA progression were counted only once, and the earlier progression was accounted for time to progression analysis. PSA progression was defined as 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 ng/mL, and confirmed by a second value at least 3 weeks later.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health State Utility Index Score (Japan) at Months 6, 12 and 18
Time frame · Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome and provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. EQ-5D-5L is designed for self-completion by respondents and consists of 2 pages comprising the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension of the EQ-5D-5L has 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) and the participant was asked to indicate his health state by ticking the box with the most appropriate statement. Index scores were generated using Japan value sets. Scores ranged from -0.111 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health state.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Utility Index Score (UK) at Months 6, 12 and 18
Time frame · Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome and provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. EQ-5D-5L is designed for self-completion by respondents and consists of 2 pages comprising the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension of the EQ-5D-5L has 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) and the participant was asked to indicate his health state by ticking the box with the most appropriate statement. Index scores were generated using UK value sets. Scores ranged from -0.594 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health state.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Status Utility Index Score (US) at Months 6, 12 and 18
Time frame · Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome and provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. EQ-5D-5L is designed for self-completion by respondents and consists of 2 pages comprising the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension of the EQ-5D-5L has 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) and the participants was asked to indicate his health state by ticking the box with the most appropriate statement. Index scores were generated using US value sets. Scores ranged from -0.109 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health state.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D02-EQ-VAS Score at Months 6, 12 and 18
Time frame · Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18
The EQ5D02-EQ-VAS is a vertical VAS with values between 0 (worst imaginable health) and 100 (best imaginable health), on which participants provide a global assessment of their health. Higher score indicate better health state.
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-PR25 Score at Months 6, 12 and 18
Time frame · Baseline, months 6, 12 and 18
EORTC QLQ-PR25 is a prostate cancer module for the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). EORTC QLQ-PR25 is designed for self-completion by respondents and assesses urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, treatment-related symptoms and sexual activity and functioning. The rule of scoring for EORTC QLQ-PR25 follows instruction of EORTC QLQ-PR25 Scoring Manual 2.0. It consist of 25 questions distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'). All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores reflecting either more symptoms (urinary, bowel, hormonal treatment-related symptoms) or higher levels of activity or functioning (sexual).
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg | 15 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg | 51.4 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg | 61.9 |
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg | 8.80 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg | 96.1 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg | 89.2 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg | 69.6 |
| Group | Value (Score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mg | -0.0047 | 0.16874 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leuprolide Acetate 22.5 mgParticipants received 22.5 mg of leuprolide acetate (eligard) by subcutaneous injection at baseline, month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15. | 9 / 106 | 31 / 106 | 42 / 106 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
PubMed tag: none · 2022
Malek et al. 2022Translational andrology and urologycited by 4
PMID 35280654PMC8899139DOI 10.21037/tau-21-723PUB-35280654
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated