Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) During Treatment With Ribociclib + Letrozole in the Core Phase
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide | 3203 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name COMPLEEMENT-1
United States, Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Oman, Panama, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Saudi Arabia
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The purpose of this study is to collect additional safety and efficacy data for the combination of ribociclib + letrozole in men and pre/postmenopausal women with HR+HER2- advanced breast cancer and no prior hormonal treatment for advanced disease..
Experimental
Ribociclib + letrozole+goserelin/leuprolide
Participants received ribociclib (orally taken, 3 weeks on/1 week off) in combination with letrozole (orally taken once daily). For men and premenopausal women, either goserelin was given as an injectable subcutaneous implant or leuprolide was given as an intramuscular injection.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) During Treatment With Ribociclib + Letrozole in the Core Phase
Time frame · From start of treatment up to 30 days after last treatment (for participants who did not enter to the Extension phase) or up to last treatment in the Core phase (for participants who entered the Extension phase), assessed up to approximately 33 months.
AEs were defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign(s), symptom(s), or medical condition(s). SAEs were defined as meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: is fatal or life-threatening, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. A SAE which caused death of the participant was considered as fatal SAE. AEs were assessed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 to 5 were used to characterize the severity of the Adverse Event. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening and Grade 5: death related to AE. A participant with multiple severity grades for an AE is only counted under the maximum grade.
Time-to-Progression (TTP) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)
Time frame · Up to approximately 33 months
Time to progression (TTP) is defined as time from date of start of treatment to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. Participants with symptoms of rapidly progressing disease without radiologic evidence were classified as progression only when clear evidence of clinical deterioration was documented and/or patient discontinued due to 'Disease progression' or death due to study indication. When there was no documentation of radiologic evidence of progression, and the patient discontinued for 'Disease progression' due to documented clinical deterioration of disease, the date of discontinuation was used as date of progression. TTP was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI of median was calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)
Time frame · Up to approximately 33 months
Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 based on investigator's assessment. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. 95% CI was calculated using the exact binomial method.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) Based on Investigator's Assessment (Core Phase)
Time frame · Up to approximately 33 months
Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) or an overall lesion response of stable disease (SD), lasting as per local review, for a duration of at least 24 weeks. CR, PR and SD are defined according to RECIST 1.1 based on investigator's assessment. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease. 95% CI was calculated using the exact binomial method.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) Score (Core Phase)
Time frame · On Day 1 of Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4 ,5, 6, 8, 10, 12 and after that every 3 cycles, and End of treatment, assessed up to 33 months. Cycle=28 days
Change from baseline in FACT-B scores was assessed. FACT-B is a self-report instrument that measures multidimensional quality of life (QOL) in patients with breast cancer. The FACT-B consists of 37 questions that address physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, with specific questions relevant to women with breast cancer. Each item has a score range of 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much), with a total score ranging from 0-148. The higher the score, the better the QOL reported by the participant. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in QoL. Due to the nature of the questionnaire, only females were asked to complete this questionnaire.
Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs in the Extension Phase
Time frame · From first dose of treatment in the Extension phase up to 30 days after last dose of treatment, assessed up approximately 37.6 months
AEs were defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable sign(s), symptom(s), or medical condition(s). SAEs were defined as meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: is fatal or life-threatening, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. AEs were assessed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1 to 5 were used to characterize the severity of the Adverse Event. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening and Grade 5: death related to AE. A participant with multiple severity grades for an AE is only counted under the maximum grade.
Number of Participants With Clinical Benefit (Extension Phase)
Time frame · On Day 1 of every 3 cycles, starting from Cycle 1 of the Extension phase until end of treatment, assessed up to 37.4 months. Cycle= 28 days
Clinical benefit as assessed by the Investigator during Extension phase
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide | 3203 |
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide | 27.1 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide | 29.3 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide | 70.7 |
| Group | Value (Score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide | 0.2 | 13.29 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide | 297 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + Letrozole + Goserelin/Leuprolide | 413 |
| Group | Value (log2 transformed relative ratio) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Resistance Cohort | 0.112 | 0.500 |
| Sensitive Cohort | -0.218 | 0.352 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Patients- On-treatment Core PhaseAEs collected in the on-treatment period of the core phase (up to 30 days after last treatment for participants who did not enter the Extension phase or up to last treatment in the Core phase for participants who entered the Extension phase) | 74 / 3246 | 702 / 3246 | 3150 / 3246 |
| All Patients- On-treatment Extension PhaseAEs collected in the on-treatment period of the Extension phase (from first dose of treatment in the Extension phase up to 30 days after last dose of treatment) | 5 / 413 | 54 / 413 | 247 / 413 |
| All-patients- Post-treatment Survival Follow-up Core PhaseDeaths collected in the post-treatment survival follow-up period (starting from 31 days post-treatment in the Core phase). No AEs were collected during this period | 90 / 2759 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| All-patients- Post-treatment Survival Follow-up Extension PhaseDeaths collected in the post-treatment survival follow-up period (starting from 31 days post-treatment in the Extension phase). No AEs were collected during this period | 3 / 408 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
3 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Clinical trial · 2022
Campone et al. 2022Breast cancer research and treatmentcited by 10
PMID 35212906DOI 10.1007/s10549-022-06543-1PUB-35212906
Indexing hint: Clinical trial · 2022
De Laurentiis et al. 2022Targeted oncologycited by 4
PMID 36152144PMC9684264DOI 10.1007/s11523-022-00913-xPUB-36152144
Indexing hint: Clinical trial · 2021
De Laurentiis et al. 2021Breast cancer research and treatmentcited by 28
PMID 34414532PMC8505291DOI 10.1007/s10549-021-06334-0PUB-34414532
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated