Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedNot applicableResults postedRegistry data

Outpatient Foley For Starting Induction of Labor at TErm

Short name OFFSITE

This trial does not test a peptide that PepBank tracks.

  • Measures Oxytocin, does not give it. It appears in an outcome measure.

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Not applicable
Enrollment
129 participants (actual)
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham · Other
Design
Randomized · Open label (no masking)
Countries
1 country

United States

Start
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Oct 2017
Completion
Oct 2017
First posted
29 Apr 2016 (estimated)
Last update posted
9 Jul 2019
Conditions
Pregnancy

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
201620172018
  1. N/A

    OFFSITE

    NCT02756689

    Mar 2016 to Oct 2017

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The investigators are performing a randomized controlled-trial investigating starting cervical ripening in the outpatient setting with a mechanical method, the transcervical Foley catheter. This is a pilot study to establish the efficacy of this method in decreasing time as in inpatient and evaluate patient satisfaction.

Interventions

  • Inpatient cervical ripeningOther
  • Outpatient cervical ripeningOther

Arms2

  • Active comparator

    Inpatient cervical Ripening

    Subjects in this arm will be seen in the outpatient setting, and if they qualify and are randomized to the inpatient (control) group, they will be admitted to labor and delivery the next day for cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter.

  • Active comparator

    Outpatient cervical Ripening

    Subjects in this arm will undergo cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter in the outpatient setting (treatment arm). The transcervical catheter will be placed in the office after confirmation of fetal well-being. They will then return the next morning to be admitted to labor and delivery for oxytocin administration.

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Total Time From Admission to Delivery

    Time frame · From baseline to the time of delivery (baseline is from admission), up to 7 days

Secondary outcomes(20)
  1. Total Hospital Duration

    Time frame · From admission time to the hospital until discharge from the hospital, up to 7 days

  2. Number of Participants Using Acetaminophen

    Time frame · From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.

  3. Number of Participants Calling the Obstetrical Triage Unit

    Time frame · From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.

  4. Number of Participants Admitted Prior to the Scheduled Induction of Labor Time

    Time frame · From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.

  5. Number of Participants With Spontaneous Rupture of Membranes Between Foley Bulb Placement and Admission

    Time frame · From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.

  6. Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Tracings 30-minutes After Foley Bulb Placement.

    Time frame · From placement until 30 minutes.

  7. Total Duration of Time of Neuraxial Anesthesia Use

    Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery, up to 3 days

  8. Total Duration of Time From Rupture of Membranes Until Delivery

    Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery, up to 3 days

  9. Maximum Oxytocin Rate

    Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery, up to 3 days

  10. Highest Maternal Intrapartum Temperature

    Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery, up to 3 days

  11. Number of Participants With Chorioamnionitis

    Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery.

  12. Number of Participants With Meconium-stained Fluid

    Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery.

  13. Number of Participants With Neonates With Shoulder Dystocia

    Time frame · Assessed at delivery.

  14. Number of Participants Who Had a Cesarean Delivery

    Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery.

  15. Number of Participants With an Operative Vaginal Delivery

    Time frame · Assessed at delivery.

  16. Postpartum Hemorrhage

    Time frame · Assessed at delivery.

  17. Number of Participants With Endometritis

    Time frame · Assessed from delivery until 30 days post-discharge.

  18. Number of Participants With Readmission Within 30 Days

    Time frame · Assessed from time of discharge until 30 days post-discharge.

  19. Number of Neonates With a 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 7

    Time frame · Assessed at time of delivery up to 5-minutes post-delivery.

    Registry description

    Apgar scores are assigned to all births. These are universally performed and assigned in the United States. The scoring system is between 0-10. 0 is the minimum score and 10 is the maximum. Lower scores are worse than higher scores.

  20. Number of Neonates With Umbilical Artery Cord pH < 7.1

    Time frame · Assessed at time of delivery up to 5-minutes post-delivery.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeMean· From baseline to the time of delivery (baseline is from admission), up to 7 days

Total Time From Admission to Delivery

GroupValue (hours)Spread
Inpatient Group13.57.0
Outpatient Group (Intervention)12.47.4
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeMean· From admission time to the hospital until discharge from the hospital, up to 7 days

Total Hospital Duration

GroupValue (days)Spread
Inpatient Group2.70.6
Outpatient Group (Intervention)2.60.5
Secondary outcomeCount of participants· From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.

Number of Participants Using Acetaminophen

GroupValue (Participants)
Inpatient Group6
Outpatient Group (Intervention)13
Secondary outcomeCount of participants· From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.

Number of Participants Calling the Obstetrical Triage Unit

GroupValue (Participants)
Inpatient Group0
Outpatient Group (Intervention)4
Secondary outcomeCount of participants· From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.

Number of Participants Admitted Prior to the Scheduled Induction of Labor Time

GroupValue (Participants)
Inpatient Group3
Outpatient Group (Intervention)10
Secondary outcomeCount of participants· From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.

Number of Participants With Spontaneous Rupture of Membranes Between Foley Bulb Placement and Admission

GroupValue (Participants)
Inpatient Group5
Outpatient Group (Intervention)4
Secondary outcomeCount of participants· From placement until 30 minutes.

Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Tracings 30-minutes After Foley Bulb Placement.

GroupValue (Participants)
Inpatient Group0
Outpatient Group (Intervention)0
Secondary outcomeMean· Assessed from baseline to delivery, up to 3 days

Total Duration of Time of Neuraxial Anesthesia Use

GroupValue (hours)Spread
Inpatient Group8.76.3
Outpatient Group (Intervention)8.46.9

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Inpatient GroupAdverse Events: none0 / 6416 / 640 / 64
Outpatient GroupAdverse events: none0 / 6512 / 650 / 65

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies8

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

0 studies on this page

Indexing hint: Meta-analysis (pooled) · 2012

Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Jozwiak et al. 2012The Cochrane database of systematic reviewscited by 89

PMID 22419277DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub2PUB-22419277

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Indexing hint: Meta-analysis (pooled) · 2009

Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

Alfirevic et al. 2009The Cochrane database of systematic reviewscited by 78

PMID 19821304PMC4164045DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003246.pub2PUB-19821304

Rights unknown
Source link

More studies

6 studies on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018

Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kuper et al. 2018Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 28

PMID 29889751DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000002678PUB-29889751

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

PubMed tag: none · 2014

The timing of adverse events with Foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening; implications for outpatient use.

Sciscione et al. 2014American journal of perinatologycited by 28

PMID 24347259DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1359718PUB-24347259

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2014

Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial.

Edwards et al. 2014Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 42

PMID 24807327DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000000238PUB-24807327

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2013

Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial.

Henry et al. 2013BMC pregnancy and childbirthcited by 68

PMID 23356673PMC3564932DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-25PUB-23356673

CC BY
Download PDF

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2008

Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.

Pettker et al. 2008Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 39

PMID 18515515DOI 10.1097/aog.0b013e31817615a0PUB-18515515

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2001

Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting.

Sciscione et al. 2001Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 57

PMID 11704164DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4PUB-11704164

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Other registry references

References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.

  • DerivedAlfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Nogueira Pileggi V, Plachcinski R, Osoti AO, Finucane EM. Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 27;8(8):CD007372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007372.pub4. PMID 32852803

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
Female
Age
from 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 * Multiparous * Singleton gestation * Gestational age between 39+0 and 42+0 * Vertex presentation * Cervix ≤ 3 cm. If cervix is between 2 and 3 cm dilated, it must be \<80% effaced * No prior cesarean section or uterine surgery * Resides within Jefferson County, Alabama. * Access to a telephone * Reliable transportation Exclusion Criteria: * Unsuitable for outpatient Foley placement management (IUGR, oligohydramnios, prior cesarean delivery, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or uncontrolled chronic hypertension, complex maternal disease, provider discretion). Any patient with pregestational or gestational diabetes on medications will be excluded. * Latex allergy * Contraindication to induction of labor * Evidence of labor * Fetal anomaly or demise * Inability to given consent (non-English speaking, inability to read or write)

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.