Total Time From Admission to Delivery
| Group | Value (hours) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inpatient Group | 13.5 | 7.0 |
| Outpatient Group (Intervention) | 12.4 | 7.4 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedNot applicableResults postedRegistry dataShort name OFFSITE
This trial does not test a peptide that PepBank tracks.
United States
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The investigators are performing a randomized controlled-trial investigating starting cervical ripening in the outpatient setting with a mechanical method, the transcervical Foley catheter. This is a pilot study to establish the efficacy of this method in decreasing time as in inpatient and evaluate patient satisfaction.
Active comparator
Inpatient cervical Ripening
Subjects in this arm will be seen in the outpatient setting, and if they qualify and are randomized to the inpatient (control) group, they will be admitted to labor and delivery the next day for cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter.
Active comparator
Outpatient cervical Ripening
Subjects in this arm will undergo cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter in the outpatient setting (treatment arm). The transcervical catheter will be placed in the office after confirmation of fetal well-being. They will then return the next morning to be admitted to labor and delivery for oxytocin administration.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Total Time From Admission to Delivery
Time frame · From baseline to the time of delivery (baseline is from admission), up to 7 days
Total Hospital Duration
Time frame · From admission time to the hospital until discharge from the hospital, up to 7 days
Number of Participants Using Acetaminophen
Time frame · From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.
Number of Participants Calling the Obstetrical Triage Unit
Time frame · From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.
Number of Participants Admitted Prior to the Scheduled Induction of Labor Time
Time frame · From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.
Number of Participants With Spontaneous Rupture of Membranes Between Foley Bulb Placement and Admission
Time frame · From placement of Foley bulb to 24 hours.
Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Tracings 30-minutes After Foley Bulb Placement.
Time frame · From placement until 30 minutes.
Total Duration of Time of Neuraxial Anesthesia Use
Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery, up to 3 days
Total Duration of Time From Rupture of Membranes Until Delivery
Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery, up to 3 days
Maximum Oxytocin Rate
Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery, up to 3 days
Highest Maternal Intrapartum Temperature
Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery, up to 3 days
Number of Participants With Chorioamnionitis
Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery.
Number of Participants With Meconium-stained Fluid
Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery.
Number of Participants With Neonates With Shoulder Dystocia
Time frame · Assessed at delivery.
Number of Participants Who Had a Cesarean Delivery
Time frame · Assessed from baseline to delivery.
Number of Participants With an Operative Vaginal Delivery
Time frame · Assessed at delivery.
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Time frame · Assessed at delivery.
Number of Participants With Endometritis
Time frame · Assessed from delivery until 30 days post-discharge.
Number of Participants With Readmission Within 30 Days
Time frame · Assessed from time of discharge until 30 days post-discharge.
Number of Neonates With a 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 7
Time frame · Assessed at time of delivery up to 5-minutes post-delivery.
Apgar scores are assigned to all births. These are universally performed and assigned in the United States. The scoring system is between 0-10. 0 is the minimum score and 10 is the maximum. Lower scores are worse than higher scores.
Number of Neonates With Umbilical Artery Cord pH < 7.1
Time frame · Assessed at time of delivery up to 5-minutes post-delivery.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (hours) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inpatient Group | 13.5 | 7.0 |
| Outpatient Group (Intervention) | 12.4 | 7.4 |
| Group | Value (days) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inpatient Group | 2.7 | 0.6 |
| Outpatient Group (Intervention) | 2.6 | 0.5 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Inpatient Group | 6 |
| Outpatient Group (Intervention) | 13 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Inpatient Group | 0 |
| Outpatient Group (Intervention) | 4 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Inpatient Group | 3 |
| Outpatient Group (Intervention) | 10 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Inpatient Group | 5 |
| Outpatient Group (Intervention) | 4 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Inpatient Group | 0 |
| Outpatient Group (Intervention) | 0 |
| Group | Value (hours) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inpatient Group | 8.7 | 6.3 |
| Outpatient Group (Intervention) | 8.4 | 6.9 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient GroupAdverse Events: none | 0 / 64 | 16 / 64 | 0 / 64 |
| Outpatient GroupAdverse events: none | 0 / 65 | 12 / 65 | 0 / 65 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
0 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Meta-analysis (pooled) · 2012
Jozwiak et al. 2012The Cochrane database of systematic reviewscited by 89
PMID 22419277DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub2PUB-22419277
Indexing hint: Meta-analysis (pooled) · 2009
Alfirevic et al. 2009The Cochrane database of systematic reviewscited by 78
PMID 19821304PMC4164045DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003246.pub2PUB-19821304
6 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018
Kuper et al. 2018Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 28
PMID 29889751DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000002678PUB-29889751
PubMed tag: none · 2014
Sciscione et al. 2014American journal of perinatologycited by 28
PMID 24347259DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1359718PUB-24347259
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2014
Edwards et al. 2014Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 42
PMID 24807327DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000000238PUB-24807327
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2013
Henry et al. 2013BMC pregnancy and childbirthcited by 68
PMID 23356673PMC3564932DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-25PUB-23356673
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2008
Pettker et al. 2008Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 39
PMID 18515515DOI 10.1097/aog.0b013e31817615a0PUB-18515515
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2001
Sciscione et al. 2001Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 57
PMID 11704164DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4PUB-11704164
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated