Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 6 to 12
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mg | 82.2 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg | 83.1 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataJapan
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Relugolix (TAK-385) 40 mg Compared With Leuprorelin in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
NCT026552375 Mar 2016 to 25 Sept 2017
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Relugolix (TAK-385) 40 mg administered orally once daily for 12 weeks, compared with leuprorelin injection (once every 4 weeks, 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg subcutaneously \[SC\]/time) in patients with uterine fibroids.
Experimental
Relugolix 40 mg
Relugolix placebo matching tablets, orally, once daily along with leuprorelin acetate placebo matching injection, SC, once in 4 weeks for 3 to 6 weeks in run-in period followed by relugolix 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and leuprorelin acetate placebo matching injection, SC, once in 4 weeks for 24 weeks in treatment period.
Active comparator
Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg
Relugolix placebo matching tablets, orally, once daily along with leuprorelin acetate placebo matching injection, SC, once in 4 weeks for 3 to 6 weeks in run-in period followed by leuprorelin acetate 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg, injection, SC, once in 4 weeks and relugolix placebo matching tablets, orally, once daily for 24 weeks in treatment period.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 6 to 12
Time frame · Week 6 to 12
PBAC score was used to measure volume of menstrual blood loss. Participants used sanitary products designated by sponsor and recorded the numbers of tampons or towels used, clots and flooding in patient diary. Three diagrams used which represented a lightly, moderately stained or completely saturated pad/tampon. Following scores assigned: 1) 1, 5, or 20 points for each pad; 2) 1, 5, or 10 points for each tampon; 3) 1 or 5 points for each blood clot of \<1 cm/=1 cm/\>1 in longest diameter; 4) 5 points for each episode of flooding. The total PBAC score (sum of points) ranges from 0 to \>500.
Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 2 to 6
Time frame · Week 2 to 6
PBAC score was used to measure volume of menstrual blood loss. Participants used sanitary products designated by sponsor and recorded the numbers of tampons or towels used, clots and flooding in patient diary. Three diagrams used which represented a lightly, moderately stained or completely saturated pad/tampon. Following scores assigned: 1) 1, 5, or 20 points for each pad; 2) 1, 5, or 10 points for each tampon; 3) 1 or 5 points for each blood clot of \<1 cm/=1 cm/\>1 in longest diameter; 4) 5 points for each episode of flooding. The total PBAC score (sum of points) ranges from 0 to \>500.
Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 From Week 18 to 24
Time frame · Week 18 to 24
PBAC score was used to measure volume of menstrual blood loss. Participants used sanitary products designated by sponsor and recorded the numbers of tampons or towels used, clots and flooding in patient diary. Three diagrams used which represented a lightly, moderately stained or completely saturated pad/tampon. Following scores assigned: 1) 1, 5, or 20 points for each pad; 2) 1, 5, or 10 points for each tampon; 3) 1 or 5 points for each blood clot of \<1 cm/=1 cm/\>1 in longest diameter; 4) 5 points for each episode of flooding. The total PBAC score (sum of points) ranges from 0 to \>500.
Percentage of Participants With Total PBAC Score of <10 for 6 Weeks Before the Final Dose of Study Drug
Time frame · For 6 weeks before the final dose of study drug (up to Week 24)
PBAC score was used to measure volume of menstrual blood loss. Participants used sanitary products designated by sponsor and recorded the numbers of tampons or towels used, clots and flooding in patient diary. Three diagrams used which represented a lightly, moderately stained or completely saturated pad/tampon. Following scores assigned: 1) 1, 5, or 20 points for each pad; 2) 1, 5, or 10 points for each tampon; 3) 1 or 5 points for each blood clot of \<1 cm/=1 cm/\>1 in longest diameter; 4) 5 points for each episode of flooding. The total PBAC score (sum of points) ranges from 0 to \>500.
Percent Change From Baseline in Myoma Volumes at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Time frame · Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
A transvaginal ultrasound was performed to determine myoma volumes. Only the largest myoma among those measurable at visit 1 was measured throughout the study. On the assumption that the myoma was spheroids, the myoma volumes were calculated using 3 diameters (D1, D2, and D3). D1: the longest diameter of the myoma; D2: the longest diameter of the myoma which was perpendicular to D1; D3: the diameter of the myoma which crossed the intersection of D1 and D2 (intersection "Z") and was perpendicular to D1/D2 plane. The formula used for calculation is Myoma volume= D1\*D2\*D3\*π/6.
Percent Change From Baseline in Uterine Volumes at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Time frame · Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
A transvaginal ultrasound was performed for determination of uterine volumes. On the assumption that the uterus was spheroids, the uterine volumes were calculated using 3 diameters (D1, D2, and D3) measured as shown below: D1: the longest diameter of the uterus (unit of length: cm); D2: the longest diameter of the uterus which was perpendicular to D1 (unit of length: cm); D3: the diameter of the uterus which crossed the intersection of D1 and D2 (intersection "Z") and was perpendicular to D1/D2 plane (unit of length: cm). The formula used for calculation is Uterine volume=D1\*D2\*D3\*π/6.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow up
Time frame · Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow up (up to Week 28)
Anemia-related measurements consisted of hemoglobin, which were determined at the central laboratory.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score
Time frame · From Week 6 to 12, from Week 2 to 6, from Week 18 to 24, and for 6 weeks before the final dose (up to Week 24)
Pain symptoms were evaluated using the NRS score. NRS score is a self-reported instrument assessing pain from 0 to 10. Higher scores reflect greater level of pain.
Change From Baseline in Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL)- Symptom Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up
Time frame · Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up (up to Week 28)
UFS-QOL was a 37-item self-reporting tool for evaluating QOL in participants with uterine fibroid. It includes eight symptom-related questions and 29 HRQL questions across six subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-consciousness, sexual function). The total symptom severity score is ranging from 0 to 100. The higher scores indicate greater severity.
Change From Baseline in Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL)- HRQL Total Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up
Time frame · Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and Follow-up (up to Week 28)
UFS-QOL was a 37-item self-reporting tool for evaluating QOL in participants with uterine fibroid. It includes eight symptom-related questions and 29 HRQL questions across six subscales (concern, activities, energy/mood, control, self-consciousness, sexual function). The total HRQL score is ranging from 0 to 100. The higher scores indicate better QOL.
Number of Participants Who Had One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Time frame · Up to Week 28
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values of Vital Signs
Time frame · Up to Week 28
Vital signs included sitting blood pressure (after the participant has rested for at least 5 minutes), body temperature (oral or tympanic measurement) (degree Celsius \[°C\]) and pulse (beats per minute \[bpm\]) is reported.
Number of Participants With TEAE Related to Weight
Time frame · Up to Week 28
Number of participants with TEAEs of which threshold was 5% or above in either treatment group related to weight was reported.
Number of Participants With TEAE Related to Standard 12-Lead ECGs
Time frame · Up to Week 28
Number of participants with TEAEs of which threshold was 5% or above in either treatment group related to ECG was reported.
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values of Laboratory Test
Time frame · Up to Week 28
Number of participants with any markedly abnormal values in laboratory tests collected throughout study is reported. WBC = White blood cells, AST = Aspartate Aminotransferase, ALT = Alanine Aminotransferase, GGT = gamma-glutamyl transferase, ULN = upper limit of normal or upper reference limit.
Number of Participants With TEAE (Bone Density Decreased) Related to Bone Mineral Density
Time frame · Up to Week 28
Number of participants with TEAEs of which threshold was 5% or above in either treatment group related to bone mineral density was reported.
Number of Participants With TEAE Related to Biochemical Bone Metabolism Markers
Time frame · Up to Week 28
Number of participants with TEAEs of which threshold was 5% or above in either treatment group related to biochemical bone metabolism markers was reported.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mg | 82.2 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg | 83.1 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mg | 64.2 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg | 31.7 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mg | 84.1 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg | 94.7 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mg | 79.0 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg | 92.3 |
| Group | Value (cm^3) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mg | -18.74 | 31.849 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg | -6.68 | 33.377 |
| Group | Value (cm^3) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mg | -22.05 | 17.870 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg | -6.90 | 27.984 |
| Group | Value (g/dL) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mg | 0.79 | 0.763 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg | 0.60 | 0.789 |
| Group | Value (score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mg | 0.21 | 0.500 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg | 0.14 | 0.363 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relugolix 40 mgRelugolix placebo matching tablets, orally, once daily along with leuprorelin acetate placebo matching injection, subcutaneously (SC), once in 4 weeks for 3 to 6 weeks in run-in period followed by relugolix 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and leuprorelin acetate placebo matching injection, SC, once in 4 weeks for 24 weeks in treatment period. | 0 / 138 | 0 / 138 | 123 / 138 |
| Leuprorelin 1.88 mg or 3.75 mgRelugolix placebo matching tablets, orally, once daily along with leuprorelin acetate placebo matching injection, subcutaneously (SC), once in 4 weeks for 3 to 6 weeks in run-in period followed by leuprorelin acetate 1.88 mg or 3.75 mg, injection, SC, once in 4 weeks and relugolix placebo matching tablets, orally, once daily for 24 weeks in treatment period. | 0 / 142 | 2 / 142 | 134 / 142 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Observational study · 2019
Osuga et al. 2019Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 70
PMID 30741797DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000003141PUB-30741797
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated