Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin | 23.8 |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin | 13.0 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name MONALEESA-7
United States, Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Italy, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Arab Emirates
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether treatment with tamoxifen or a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) + goserelin + LEE011 prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to treatment with tamoxifen or a NSAI + goserelin + placebo in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer.
Experimental
Ribociclib + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin
Ribociclib 600 mg daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with NSAI or tamoxifen (tamoxifen 20 mg daily oral or letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral or anastrozole 1 mg daily oral) and goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneous injection (once every 28 days)
Placebo comparator
Placebo + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin
Placebo daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with NSAI or tamoxifen (tamoxifen 20 mg daily oral or letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral or anastrozole 1 mg daily oral) and goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneous injection (once every 28 days). Participants were unblinded once the final OS analysis was conducted and after the implementation of protocol amendment 6 (16-Jul-2019) and were given the option to crossover to treatment with ribociclib +NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame · From randomization to first documented progression or death, assessed up to approximately 29 months
PFS was defined as the period starting from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death caused by any reason. In cases where patients did not experience an event, the PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Clinical deterioration without objective radiological evidence was not considered as documented disease progression. PFS was assessed via local radiology assessment according to RECIST 1.1. As per protocol, the final PFS analysis was conducted after approximately 392 PFS events were documented. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS, and the median PFS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. A stratified Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of PFS, along with 95% confidence interval
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame · From randomization to death, assessed up to approximately 45 months
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. In cases where the patient's death was not recorded, the OS value was censored at the date of the last known patient's survival status. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. As per protocol, the final OS analysis was conducted after approximately 189 deaths were documented. The median OS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group.The distribution of OS between the two treatment arms was compared using a log-rank test at one-sided cumulative 2.5% level of significance. A stratified Cox regression was used to estimate the OS hazard ratio and the associated 95% CI.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame · Up to approximately 29 months
ORR is the percentage of participants with the best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 as per local assessment. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame · Up to approximately 29 months
Percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) lasting 24 weeks or longer as defined in RECIST 1.1 and local assessment. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease: PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20% the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time to Response (TTR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame · Up to approximately 29 months
Time to response is the time from the date of randomization to the first documented response (CR or PR, which must be confirmed subsequently) according to RECIST 1.1 as per local assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate TTR, and the median TTR, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. Participants who did not achieve a confirmed response were censored at the maximum follow-up time for patients who had a PFS event (i.e. either progressed or died due to any cause) or at the date of last adequate tumor assessment otherwise. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame · Up to approximately 29 months
DOR was defined as the time from the first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer as defined in RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DOR, and the median DOR, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. If a participant had not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) by at Least One Category of the Score
Time frame · Baseline, up to approximately 29 months
ECOG PS categorized patients based on their ability to perform daily activities and self-care, with scores ranging from 0 to 5. A score of 0 indicated no restrictions in activity, while higher scores indicated increasing limitations. Time to definitive deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the event, defined as experiencing an increase in ECOG PS by at least one category from the baseline or death. A deterioration was considered definitive if no improvements in the ECOG PS were observed at a subsequent time. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution, and the median time to definitive deterioration, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. Patients receiving any further therapy prior to definitive worsening were censored at their date of last assessment prior to start of therapy. Patients that had not worsened at the data cutoff point were censored at the date of last assessment.
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Scale Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time frame · Up to approximately 29 months
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that includes 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 1 GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items. GHS/QoL scale score ranges between 0 and 100. A high score for GHS/QoL represents better functioning or QoL.The time to definitive 10% deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which is defined as at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of the QoL score (without further improvement above the threshold) or death due to any cause. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution, and the median time to definitive 10% deterioration, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. If a patient had not had an event, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate QoL evaluation.
Change From Baseline in the GHS/QoL Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time frame · Baseline, every 2 cycles after randomization during 18 months, then every 3 cycles up to end of treatment (EOT); EOT; and every 8 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression, assessed up to approximately 29 months. Cycle=28 days
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that includes 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 1 GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items. GHS/QoL scale score ranges between 0 and 100. A high score for GHS/QoL represents better functioning or QoL.The change from baseline in the GHS/QoL score was assessed. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement. For subjects who discontinued treatment without disease progression, post-treatment efficacy visits occurred every 8 weeks during the initial 18 months since start of treatment, followed by visits every 12 weeks until disease progression.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin | 23.8 |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin | 13.0 |
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin | NA |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin | 40.9 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin | 40.9 |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin | 29.7 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin | 79.1 |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin | 69.7 |
| Group | Value (months) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin | NA |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin | NA |
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin | 21.3 |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin | 17.5 |
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin | NA |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin | NA |
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin | NA |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin | 21.2 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin (On-treatment)AEs collected during on-treatment period (up to 30 days post-treatment) | 5 / 335 | 81 / 335 | 326 / 335 |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin (On-treatment)AEs collected during on-treatment period (up to 30 days post-treatment or start of crossover treatment) | 6 / 337 | 49 / 337 | 312 / 337 |
| Placebo Crossover to Ribociclib (On-Treatment)AEs collected during crossover on-treatment period with ribociclib for participants randomized to placebo arm who crossed-over to ribociclib (up to 30 days post- crossover treatment) | 0 / 17 | 1 / 17 | 14 / 17 |
| Ribociclib + NSAI/Tamoxifen + Goserelin (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)Deaths collected in the post- treatment survival follow-up period (starting from day 31 post- treatment to end of study). No AEs were collected during this period | 168 / 251 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| Placebo + NSAI/Tamoxifen+ Goserelin (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)Deaths collected in the post- treatment survival follow-up period (starting from day 31 post- treatment to end of study or start of crossover treatment). No AEs were collected during this period | 202 / 293 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
| Placebo Crossover to Ribociclib (Post-treatment Survival Follow-up)Deaths collected in the crossover post- treatment survival follow-up period (starting from day 31 post-crossover treatment to end of study). No AEs were collected during this period | 1 / 17 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
3 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2022
Lu et al. 2022Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Researchcited by 232
PMID 34965945PMC9377723DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3032PUB-34965945
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2019
Im et al. 2019The New England journal of medicinecited by 767
PMID 31166679DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1903765PUB-31166679
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018
Tripathy et al. 2018The Lancet. Oncologycited by 795
PMID 29804902DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30292-4PUB-29804902
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated