Progression-free Survival (PFS)
| Group | Value (months) |
|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat) | 3.3 |
| Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo) | 3.1 |
Trial · Interventional
Active, not recruitingPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataUnited States, South Africa
1 trial · 1 ongoing · 1 with posted results
Exemestane With or Without Entinostat in Treating Patients With Recurrent Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer That is Locally Advanced or Metastatic
NCT0211528229 Mar 2014 to est. 2 Jun 2027
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This randomized phase III trial studies exemestane and entinostat to see how well they work compared to exemestane alone in treating patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced) or another place in the body (metastatic). Estrogen can cause the growth of breast cancer cells. Endocrine therapy using exemestane may fight breast cancer by lowering the amount of estrogen the body makes. Entinostat may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether exemestane is more effective with or without entinostat in treating breast cancer.
Experimental
Arm A (exemestane, entinostat)
Patients receive exemestane PO QD on days 1-28 and entinostat PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT or MRI at baseline, at the end of cycle 3, every 3 cycles, at treatment discontinuation, and during follow-up, collection of blood samples at baseline and day 15 of cycle 1, and collection of archived tissue at baseline. Pre/perimenopausal female patients and all male patients also receive goserelin acetate SC on day 1.
Placebo comparator
Arm B (exemestane, placebo)
Patients receive exemestane as in Arm A and placebo PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo CT or MRI at baseline, at the end of cycle 3, every 3 cycles, at treatment discontinuation, and during follow-up, collection of blood samples at baseline and day 15 of cycle 1, and collection of archived tissue at baseline. Pre/perimenopausal female patients and all male patients also receive goserelin acetate SC on day 1.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame · Assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined to be time from randomization to the earliest documented disease progression as defined by the RECIST criteria, new primary breast cancer, or death without progression. Disease assessment was to continue until disease progression, even after non-protocol anti-cancer therapy was started. Cases with incomplete follow up or without adequate disease evaluations were censored at the date last documented to be free of progression, regardless of whether non-protocol anti-cancer therapy was started or not. Disease progression was based on central review, and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. In addition, the appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS rate.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame · Assessed every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until death
Overall survival (OS) was defined to be time from randomization to death from any cause. Cases who were still alive were censored at the date last known alive.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame · Assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression
Objective response rate was defined as number of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by all randomized patients. Responses were evaluated using the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), and/or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s).
Time-to-treatment Deterioration (TTD)
Time frame · Disease assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression
Time-to-treatment deterioration (TTD) was defined as time from randomization to disease progression or death or worsening of symptoms, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was assessed per RECIST v1.1. Symptoms deterioration was measured by 6 items (GP1, GP2, GP4, GF7, B1, P2, scored 0-24) from the 8-item FACT-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI). Symptom deterioration was defined as two consecutive available decreases of at least 3 points from baseline using the 6-item FBSI in this trial, and the second visit time was used as the time of symptom deterioration in this case, unless it was the final score, for which one decrease was sufficient. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median TTD and TTD rate at a certain time point. Symptoms were assessed every cycle for the first six months after randomization, every two cycles between 6 months and 1 year. It then were assessed based on the same schedule for tumor assessments until disease progression as specified below.
Lysine Acetylation Change in CD45 Blood Mononuclear Cells Between C1D1 and C1D15 and PFS in Patients on Arm A
Time frame · Disease assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression
Peripheral blood samples (PBMCs) were collected prior to therapy and on Days 8 and 15 of cycle 1, for assessment of lysine acetylation, using an assay developed by the Trepel Laboratory, NCI/NIH. CD45 blood mononuclear cells were measured. Patients with lysine acetylation change of 1.5 folds or higher were compared to patients with lysine acetylation change of less than 1.5 folds.
Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life
Time frame · Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was measured using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G). The primary endpoint for HRQL was the FACT-G Trial Outcome Index (TOI) which was an aggregate score of 5 items from the FACT-G-Physical subscale (GP2, GP3, GP4, GP6, and GP7) and 6 items from the FACT-G-Functional subscale (GF1, GF2, GF3, GF4, GF6, and GF7). All items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. FACT-G TOI subscale score was calculated based on the scoring manual, subscale score ranges from 0 to 44, and higher scores indicate better quality of life. The primary comparison of HRQL between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment.
Patient-reported Diarrhea
Time frame · Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3
Diarrhea was measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Patients With Diarrhea (FACIT-Diarrhea) subscale form, which had 11 items, all items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. FACIT-Diarrhea subscale score was calculated based on the scoring manual, subscale score ranges from 0 to 44, and higher score indicates less diarrhea. The primary comparison of patient-reported diarrhea between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment.
Patient-reported Fatigue
Time frame · Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3
Fatigue was measured by PROMIS Fatigue short form, it had 7 items and all items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5. The PROMIS Fatigue total score and T score were calculated based on the scoring manual. The total score ranges from 7 to 35, the T score ranges from 29.4 to 83.2, higher scores indicate more fatigue. The PROMIS Fatigue T score was used for arm comparison. The primary comparison of patient-reported fatigue between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment.
Patient-reported Nausea and Anorexia
Time frame · Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3
Nausea and anorexia were measured by The Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment (FAACT)-additional concerns, which had 12 items, all items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. FAACT-additional concerns subscale score was calculated based on scoring manual. Subscale score ranges from 0 to 48, and higher scores indicate less nausea and anorexia. The primary comparison of patient-reported nausea and anorexia between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (months) |
|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat) | 3.3 |
| Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo) | 3.1 |
| Group | Value (months) |
|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat) | 23.4 |
| Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo) | 21.7 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat) | 4.6 |
| Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo) | 4.3 |
| Group | Value (months) |
|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat) | 2.9 |
| Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo) | 2.9 |
| Group | Value (months) |
|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)- Lysine Acetylation Change>=1.5 Fold | 2.8 |
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat)- Lysine Acetylation Change<1.5 Fold | 2.7 |
| Group | Value (units on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat) | 20.5 | 5.0 |
| Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo) | 20.9 | 4.7 |
| Group | Value (units on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat) | 38.8 | 7.2 |
| Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo) | 41.5 | 4.3 |
| Group | Value (T-score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestane, Entinostat) | 55.5 | 8.2 |
| Arm B (Exemestane, Placebo) | 54.1 | 8.9 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A (Exemestance, Entinostat)Patients receive exemestane PO QD on days 1-28 and entinostat PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pre/perimenopausal female patients and all male patients also receive goserelin acetate SC on day 1. Entinostat: Given PO Exemestane: Given PO Goserelin Acetate: Given SC | 209 / 305 | 151 / 296 | 280 / 296 |
| Arm A (Exemestance, Placebo)Patients receive exemestane as in Arm A and placebo PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pre/perimenopausal female patients and all male patients also receive goserelin acetate SC on day 1. Exemestane: Given PO Goserelin Acetate: Given SC Placebo Administration: Given PO | 203 / 303 | 47 / 293 | 228 / 293 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated