Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry data

Palbociclib (PD-0332991) Combined With Fulvestrant In Hormone Receptor+ HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer After Endocrine Failure (PALOMA-3)

NCTNCT01942135 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other idA5481023Other id2013-002580-26

This trial does not test a peptide that PepBank tracks.

  • Measures Goserelin, does not give it. It appears in an outcome measure.

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
521 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Pfizer · Industry
Design
Randomized · Triple masking
Countries
17 countries

United States, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Russia, South Korea, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom

Start
26 Sept 2013
Primary completion
5 Dec 2014
Completion
28 Sept 2022
First posted
13 Sept 2013 (estimated)
Last update posted
4 Apr 2024
Conditions
Metastatic Breast Cancer

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
20142016201820202022
  1. Ph 3

    Palbociclib (PD-0332991) Combined With Fulvestrant In Hormone Receptor+ HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer After Endocrine Failure (PALOMA-3)

    NCT01942135

    26 Sept 2013 to 28 Sept 2022

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The study is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, Phase 3 clinical trial with the primary objective of demonstrating the superiority of palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant (Faslodex®) over fulvestrant alone in prolonging PFS in women with HR+, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease has progressed after prior endocrine therapy. The safety between the two treatment arms will also be compared. During study treatment, pre- and perimenopausal women must be receiving therapy with the LHRH agonist goserelin (Zoladex® or generic).

Interventions

  • PalbociclibDrug
  • FulvestrantDrug
  • PlaceboDrug
  • FulvestrantDrug

Arms2

  • Experimental

    Arm A

    Given until objective progression, symptomatic deterioration, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first.

  • Active comparator

    Arm B

    Given until objective progression, symptomatic deterioration, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first.

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame · From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (assessed up to 12 months)

    Registry description

    PFS is the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of disease (PD)or death due to any cause in absence of documented PD. Participants lacking an evaluation of tumor response after randomization had their PFS time censored on the date of randomization with the duration of a day. Participants with documentation of PD or death after a long interval (2 or more incomplete or non-evaluable assessments) since the last tumor assessment were censored at the time of last objective assessment that did not show PD. The length of PFS was calculated as PFS time (months) =\[progression/death date(censor date) - randomization date + 1\]/30.4. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST v1.1) a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions.

Secondary outcomes(19)
  1. Overall Survival (OS)-Number of Participants Who Died

    Time frame · From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years)

    Registry description

    OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization were to have their OS times be censored at randomization. The length of OS was calculated as OS time (months) = \[death date (censor date) - randomization date + 1\]/30.4.

  2. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame · From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years)

    Registry description

    OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization were to have their OS times be censored at randomization. The length of OS was calculated as OS time (months) = \[death date (censor date) - randomization date + 1\]/30.4.

  3. Survival Probabilities at Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

    Time frame · From randomization until death (assessed up to 36 months)

    Registry description

    One-, Two- or Three-year Survival Probability is defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Survival time was censored to last date the participant is known to be alive.

  4. Objective Response (OR)

    Time frame · From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)

    Registry description

    OR is defined as the overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the RECIST version 1.1 Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (longest for non-nodal and short axis for nodal target lesions); Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

  5. Duration of Response (DR)

    Time frame · From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)

    Registry description

    DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as \[the date response ended (ie, date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)\]/30.4. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median of the DR is provided below. No inferential statistical analysis were done for DR. The DR was only calculated for the participants with a CR or PR.

  6. Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)

    Time frame · From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)

    Registry description

    CBR is defined as the overall complete response (CR), partial response (PR) , or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks according to the RECIST version 1.1. Clinical Benefit Response Rate (CBRR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR, PR, or SD ≥24 weeks relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received antitumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, a best response of SD ≥24 weeks, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD ≥24 weeks was counted as non-responders in the assessment of CBR. Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: CR, disappearance of all target lesions; PR, ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; OR = CR + PR.

  7. Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Palbociclib

    Time frame · Cycle 1/Day 15 and Cycle 2/Day 15

    Registry description

    Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For palbociclib, a steady-state trough was to be defined as a predose plasma concentration following at least 8 consecutive days of 125 mg daily dose without dosing interruption and the time window for the PK collection was to be between 22 and 26 hours after the dose (the day prior to PK collection) and no more than 1 hour post-dose on the day of PK collection.

  8. Ctrough for Fulvestrant

    Time frame · Cycles 2/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1

    Registry description

    Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For fulvestrant, a steady-state trough was to be defined when a patient had received all prior planned doses and the sample was collected predose.

  9. Ctrough for Goserelin

    Time frame · Cycles 2/ Day 1 and Cycle 3/ Day 1

    Registry description

    Ctrough was defined as steady-state predose concentration. Observed directly from data. For goserelin, a steady-state trough was to be defined when a patient had received all prior planned doses and the sample was collected predose.

  10. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional Scale Scores

    Time frame · From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

    Registry description

    The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant.

  11. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ-C30 Symptom Scale Scores

    Time frame · From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

    Registry description

    The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from "not at all" to "very much" and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant.

  12. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ BR23) Functional Scale Scores

    Time frame · From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

    Registry description

    The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning.

  13. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EORTC QLQ BR23 Symptom Scale Scores

    Time frame · From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

    Registry description

    The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represent more severe symptoms.

  14. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D)- Health Index Scores

    Time frame · From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

    Registry description

    The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The first part consists of 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/ depression); a participant is asked to rate each state on a three level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem) with higher levels indicating greater severity/ impairment Published weights are available that allow for the creation of a single summary score called the EQ-5D index, which basically ranges from 0 to 1 with low scores representing a higher level of dysfunction and 1 as perfect health. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

  15. Change From Baseline Between Treatment Comparison in EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores Scale

    Time frame · From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.

    Registry description

    The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

  16. Time to Deterioration (TTD)

    Time frame · Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 4, Day 1 of every alternate cycle after that until the end of treatment, as of 05 December 2014

    Registry description

    A time to event analysis was pre-specified for pain. An analysis of TTD in pain defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase of ≥10 points in pain. Deterioration will be defined increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of quartiles (time to deterioration) with 95% CI is mentioned below.

  17. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs; All Causalities)

    Time frame · From the date of randomization up to 28 calendar days (±7 days) after last dose of study intervention (up to 8.4 years).

    Registry description

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Severity will be graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0.

  18. Participants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Hematology Results

    Time frame · From baseline to end of treatment/withdrawal (up to 4.5 years)

    Registry description

    Number of participants with shifts from Grade ≤2 at baseline values to post-baseline values (shift to Grade 3 or 4) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, V4.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade ≤2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 postbaseline (for parameters Anemia, Hemoglobin increased, Neutrophil count decreased, Platelet count decreased, and White blood cell count decreased) were reported.

  19. Participants With Shifts From CTCAE Grade ≤2 at Baseline to CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline for Chemistry Results

    Time frame · From baseline to end of treatment/withdrawal (up to 4.5 years)

    Registry description

    Number of participants with shifts from Grade ≤2 at baseline values to post-baseline values (shift to Grade 3 or 4) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, V4.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade ≤2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 postbaseline (for parameters ALT increased, ALP increased, AST increased, Blood bilirubin increased, Creatinine increased, Hypercalcemia, Hyperkalemia, Hypermagnesemia, Hypernatremia, Hypoalbuminemia, Hypocalcemia, Hypokalemia, Hypomagnesemia, and Hyponatremia) were reported.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeMedian· From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (assessed up to 12 months)

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

GroupValue (months)
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant9.2
Placebo + Fulvestrant3.8
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeCount of participants· From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years)

Overall Survival (OS)-Number of Participants Who Died

GroupValue (Participants)
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant201
Placebo + Fulvestrant109
Secondary outcomeMedian· From randomization until death (up to 4.5 years)

Overall Survival (OS)

GroupValue (months)
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant34.9
Placebo + Fulvestrant28.0
Secondary outcomeNumber· From randomization until death (assessed up to 36 months)

Survival Probabilities at Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3

GroupValue (Survival Probability)
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant85.5
Placebo + Fulvestrant84.8
Secondary outcomeNumber· From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)

Objective Response (OR)

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant21.0
Placebo + Fulvestrant8.6
Secondary outcomeMedian· From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)

Duration of Response (DR)

GroupValue (Months)
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant10.4
Placebo + Fulvestrant9.0
Secondary outcomeNumber· From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 2 years)

Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant66.3
Placebo + Fulvestrant39.7
Secondary outcomeGeometric mean· Cycle 1/Day 15 and Cycle 2/Day 15

Observed Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Palbociclib

GroupValue (nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL))Spread
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant70.7044

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Palbociclib + FulvestrantParticipants were administered an initial dose of 125 mg per day orally continuously for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off that can be reduced to 100 mg or 75 mg in case of toxicity; repeated at each subsequent cycle and fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and then every 28 days. Pre- and perimenopausal women received goserelin at least 4 weeks before study treatment start and continued receiving concurrent ovarian function suppression with goserelin administered subcutaneously every 28 days during the active treatment phase. Maximum treatment duration was 105 cycles.201 / 34778 / 345341 / 345
Placebo + FulvestrantParticipants were administered placebo orally continuously dosed for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off; repeated at each subsequent cycle and Fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on Days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and then every 28 days. Pre- and perimenopausal women received goserelin at least 4 weeks before study treatment start and continued receiving concurrent ovarian function suppression with goserelin administered subcutaneously every 28 days during the active treatment phase. Maximum treatment duration was 93 cycles.109 / 17433 / 172161 / 172

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies3

Studies that cite this trial.

More studies

3 studies on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017

Palbociclib Combined with Fulvestrant in Premenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer and Prior Progression on Endocrine Therapy: PALOMA-3 Results.

Loibl et al. 2017The oncologistcited by 108

PMID 28652278PMC5599195DOI 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0072PUB-28652278

Rights unknown
Source link

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016

Palbociclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer: Detailed Safety Analysis From a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study (PALOMA-3).

Verma et al. 2016The oncologistcited by 195

PMID 27368881PMC5061543DOI 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0097PUB-27368881

Rights unknown
Source link

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2015

Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.

Turner et al. 2015The New England journal of medicinecited by 1,208

PMID 26030518DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1505270PUB-26030518

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Other registry references

References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.

  • DerivedLi H, Wu Y, Zou H, Koner S, Plichta JK, Tolaney SM, Zhang J, He YW, Wei Q, Tang L, Zhang H, Zhang B, Guo Y, Chen X, Li K, Lian L, Ma F, Luo S. Clinical efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy in HR-positive/HER2-0 and HER2-low-positive metastatic breast cancer: a secondary analysis of PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 trials. EBioMedicine. 2024 Jul;105:105186. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105186. Epub 2024 Jun 10. PMID 38861871
  • DerivedRugo HS, Im SA, Joy AA, Shparyk Y, Walshe JM, Sleckman B, Loi S, Theall KP, Kim S, Huang X, Bananis E, Mahtani R, Finn RS, Dieras V. Effect of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy on time to chemotherapy across subgroups of patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: Post hoc analyses from PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3. Breast. 2022 Dec;66:324-331. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 15. PMID 36463643
  • DerivedZhu Z, Turner NC, Loi S, Andre F, Martin M, Dieras V, Gelmon KA, Harbeck N, Zhang C, Cao JQ, Yan Z, Lu DR, Wei P, VanArsdale TL, Rejto PA, Huang X, Rugo HS, Loibl S, Cristofanilli M, Finn RS, Liu Y. Comparative biomarker analysis of PALOMA-2/3 trials for palbociclib. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022 Aug 16;6(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41698-022-00297-1. PMID 35974168
  • DerivedRugo HS, Cristofanilli M, Loibl S, Harbeck N, DeMichele A, Iwata H, Park YH, Brufsky A, Theall KP, Huang X, McRoy L, Bananis E, Turner NC. Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: Analyses From PALOMA-3. Oncologist. 2021 Aug;26(8):e1339-e1346. doi: 10.1002/onco.13833. Epub 2021 Jun 12. PMID 34037282
  • DerivedIwata H, Umeyama Y, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Schnell P, Mori Y, Fletcher O, Marshall JC, Johnson JG, Wood LS, Toi M, Finn RS, Turner NC, Bartlett CH, Cristofanilli M. Evaluation of the Association of Polymorphisms With Palbociclib-Induced Neutropenia: Pharmacogenetic Analysis of PALOMA-2/-3. Oncologist. 2021 Jul;26(7):e1143-e1155. doi: 10.1002/onco.13811. Epub 2021 Jun 7. PMID 33955129
  • DerivedFinn RS, Rugo HS, Gelmon KA, Cristofanilli M, Colleoni M, Loi S, Schnell P, Lu DR, Theall KP, Mori A, Gauthier E, Bananis E, Turner NC, Dieras V. Long-Term Pooled Safety Analysis of Palbociclib in Combination with Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Updated Analysis with up to 5 Years of Follow-Up. Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):e749-e755. doi: 10.1002/onco.13684. Epub 2021 Mar 10. PMID 33486783
  • DerivedFinn RS, Cristofanilli M, Ettl J, Gelmon KA, Colleoni M, Giorgetti C, Gauthier E, Liu Y, Lu DR, Zhang Z, Bartlett CH, Slamon DJ, Turner NC, Rugo HS. Treatment effect of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy by prognostic and intrinsic subtype and biomarker analysis in patients with bone-only disease: a joint analysis of PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 clinical trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(1):23-35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05782-4. Epub 2020 Aug 11. PMID 32783178
  • DerivedEttl J, Im SA, Ro J, Masuda N, Colleoni M, Schnell P, Bananis E, Lu DR, Cristofanilli M, Rugo HS, Finn RS. Hematologic adverse events following palbociclib dose reduction in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: pooled analysis from randomized phase 2 and 3 studies. Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Mar 12;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01263-0. PMID 32164785
  • DerivedMasuda N, Mukai H, Inoue K, Rai Y, Ohno S, Mori Y, Hashigaki S, Muramatsu Y, Umeyama Y, Iwata H, Toi M. Neutropenia management with palbociclib in Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2019 Sep;26(5):637-650. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00970-7. Epub 2019 May 24. PMID 31127500
  • DerivedTurner NC, Liu Y, Zhu Z, Loi S, Colleoni M, Loibl S, DeMichele A, Harbeck N, Andre F, Bayar MA, Michiels S, Zhang Z, Giorgetti C, Arnedos M, Huang Bartlett C, Cristofanilli M. Cyclin E1 Expression and Palbociclib Efficacy in Previously Treated Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1169-1178. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00925. Epub 2019 Feb 26. PMID 30807234
  • DerivedMasuda N, Inoue K, Nakamura R, Rai Y, Mukai H, Ohno S, Hara F, Mori Y, Hashigaki S, Muramatsu Y, Nagasawa T, Umeyama Y, Huang X, Iwata H. Palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: PALOMA-3 subgroup analysis of Japanese patients. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;24(3):262-273. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1359-3. Epub 2018 Nov 3. PMID 30392115
  • DerivedTurner NC, Slamon DJ, Ro J, Bondarenko I, Im SA, Masuda N, Colleoni M, DeMichele A, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, Harbeck N, Loibl S, Andre F, Puyana Theall K, Huang X, Giorgetti C, Huang Bartlett C, Cristofanilli M. Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1926-1936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810527. Epub 2018 Oct 20. PMID 30345905
  • DerivedCristofanilli M, DeMichele A, Giorgetti C, Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Im SA, Masuda N, Verma S, Loi S, Colleoni M, Theall KP, Huang X, Liu Y, Bartlett CH. Predictors of prolonged benefit from palbociclib plus fulvestrant in women with endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer in PALOMA-3. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 8. PMID 30308388
  • DerivedRugo HS, Turner NC, Finn RS, Joy AA, Verma S, Harbeck N, Masuda N, Im SA, Huang X, Kim S, Sun W, Iyer S, Schnell P, Bartlett CH, Johnston S. Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in older women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a pooled analysis of randomised PALOMA clinical studies. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 25. PMID 30053671
  • DerivedDieras V, Rugo HS, Schnell P, Gelmon K, Cristofanilli M, Loi S, Colleoni M, Lu DR, Mori A, Gauthier E, Huang Bartlett C, Slamon DJ, Turner NC, Finn RS. Long-term Pooled Safety Analysis of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Apr 1;111(4):419-430. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy109. PMID 30032196
  • DerivedWedam SB, Beaver JA, Amiri-Kordestani L, Bloomquist E, Tang S, Goldberg KB, Sridhara R, Ibrahim A, Kim G, Kluetz P, McKee A, Pazdur R. US Food and Drug Administration Pooled Analysis to Assess the Impact of Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer on Clinical Trial Outcomes and Radiographic Assessments. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1225-1231. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.6917. Epub 2018 Mar 9. PMID 29522361
  • DerivedTurner NC, Finn RS, Martin M, Im SA, DeMichele A, Ettl J, Dieras V, Moulder S, Lipatov O, Colleoni M, Cristofanilli M, Lu DR, Mori A, Giorgetti C, Iyer S, Bartlett CH, Gelmon KA. Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases. Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):669-680. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx797. PMID 29342248
  • DerivedFribbens C, O'Leary B, Kilburn L, Hrebien S, Garcia-Murillas I, Beaney M, Cristofanilli M, Andre F, Loi S, Loibl S, Jiang J, Bartlett CH, Koehler M, Dowsett M, Bliss JM, Johnston SR, Turner NC. Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):2961-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3061. Epub 2016 Jun 6. PMID 27269946

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
Female
Age
from 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Women 18 years or older with metastatic or locally advanced disease, not amenable to curative therapy * Confirmed diagnosis of HR+/HER2- breast cancer * Any menopausal status * Progressed within 12 months from prior adjuvant or progressed within 1 month from prior advanced/metastatic endocrine breast cancer therapy * On an LHRH agonist for at least 28 days, if pre-/peri-menopausal, and willing to switch to goserelin (Zoladex ®) at time of randomization. * Measurable disease defined by RECIST version 1.1, or bone-only disease * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 0-1 * Adequate organ and marrow function, resolution of all toxic effects of prior therapy or surgical procedures * Patient must agree to provide tumor tissue from metastatic tissue at baseline Exclusion Criteria: * Prior treatment with any CDK inhibitor, fulvestrant, everolimus, or agent that inhibits the PI3K-mTOR pathway * Patients with extensive advanced/metastatic, symptomatic visceral disease, or known uncontrolled or symptomatic CNS metastases * Major surgery or any anti-cancer therapy within 2 weeks of randomization * Prior stem cell or bone marrow transplantation * Use of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.