Change in Height SDS (Japanese National Reference Data)
| Group | Value (Standard deviation score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day | 0.84 | 0.09 |
| NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day | 1.47 | 0.09 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataJapan
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Investigating the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of NN-220 (Somatropin) in Short Stature Due to Noonan Syndrome
NCT0192786119 Aug 2013 to 12 Jul 2018
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of the trial is to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of two doses of NN-220 (somatropin) in short stature due to Noonan syndrome.
Experimental
0.033 mg/kg/day
Experimental
0.066 mg/kg/day
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change in Height SDS (Japanese National Reference Data)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Height SDS was calculated using the formula: SDS = (height - mean)/SD, where height was the height variable measured, mean and SD of height by sex and age for the reference population. The scores were centered around zero. Positive SDS indicated greater height and negative SDS indicated lesser height than the mean of the reference population. The change from baseline (week 0) in the height SDS after 104 weeks of treatment was analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline height SDS as a covariate. Positive value in change from baseline indicated that SDS was better than baseline SDS. Missing values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.
Height Velocity SDS
Time frame · Baseline to week 52
Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height (week 52) and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using the formula: SDS = (height velocity - mean)/SD, where height velocity was the height velocity variable measured, mean and SD of height velocity by sex and age for the reference population. The scores were centered around zero. Positive SDS indicated greater height velocity and negative SDS indicated lesser height velocity than the mean of the reference population.
Height Velocity SDS
Time frame · Week 52 to week 104
Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height (week 104) and height at week 52 divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using the formula: SDS = (height velocity - mean)/SD, where height velocity was the height velocity variable measured, mean and SD of height velocity by sex and age for the reference population. The scores were centered around zero. Positive SDS indicated greater height velocity and negative SDS indicated lesser height velocity than the mean of the reference population.
Height Velocity
Time frame · Baseline to week 52
Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height (week 52) and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days.
Height Velocity
Time frame · Week 52 to week 104
Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height (week 104) and height at week 52 divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days.
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
Time frame · During 104 weeks of treatment
A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE; for the pivotal phase) was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the date of visit 2 (week 0; start of treatment) and no later than the date of visit 12 (104 weeks; end of pivotal phase). For withdrawal participants (if any), an adverse event with onset date no later than 7 days after the last day of NN-220 treatment was included.
Change in IGF-I (Insulin-like Growth Factor-I)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in IGF-I was evaluated after 104 weeks of treatment. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated after 104 weeks of treatment.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Erythrocytes)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - erythrocytes. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Leukocytes and Thrombocytes)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - leukocytes and thrombocytes. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Haemoglobin)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - haemoglobin. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Haematocrit)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - haematocrit. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Neutrophils)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - neutrophils. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Lymphocytes)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - lymphocytes. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Monocytes)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - monocytes. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Eosinophils)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - eosinophils. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Basophils)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - basophils. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Lipids: Total Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol and HDL Cholesterol)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in lipids: total cholesterol, LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol and HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Biochemistry: AST, ALT, r-GTP and Alkaline Phosphatase)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in biochemical parameters - aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (r-GTP) and alkaline phosphatase. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Biochemistry: Total Protein)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in biochemical parameter - total protein. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen, Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, Total Calcium and Phosphorus)
Time frame · Baseline, week 104
Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in biochemical parameters - blood urea nitrogen, sodium, potassium, chloride, total calcium and phosphorus. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Standard deviation score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day | 0.84 | 0.09 |
| NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day | 1.47 | 0.09 |
| Group | Value (Standard deviation score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day | 2.80 | 1.13 |
| NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day | 5.01 | 1.92 |
| Group | Value (Standard deviation score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day | 0.58 | 1.59 |
| NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day | 2.65 | 1.76 |
| Group | Value (Centimeters per year (cm/year)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day | 7.88 | 0.87 |
| NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day | 9.90 | 1.49 |
| Group | Value (cm/year) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day | 6.20 | 0.95 |
| NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day | 7.99 | 1.20 |
| Group | Value (Events) |
|---|---|
| NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day | 265 |
| NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day | 306 |
| Group | Value (Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day | 90.4 | 65.5 |
| NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day | 159.1 | 88.0 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of HbA1c) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day | 0.13 | 0.20 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.033 mg/kg/DayParticipants received s.c. injection of NN-220, 0.033 mg/kg/day once daily for 234 weeks (104 weeks of pivotal phase + 104 weeks of extension phase + 26 weeks extended treatment phase). | 0 / 25 | 9 / 25 | 24 / 25 |
| 0.066 mg/kg/DayParticipants received s.c. injection of NN-220, 0.066 mg/kg/day once daily for 234 weeks (104 weeks of pivotal phase + 104 weeks of extension phase + 26 weeks extended treatment phase). | 0 / 26 | 10 / 26 | 26 / 26 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
3 studies on this page
PubMed tag: none · 2026
Muroya et al. 2026Endocrine journal
PMID 41285480PMC12895119DOI 10.1507/endocrj.ej25-0116PUB-41285480
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2020
Horikawa et al. 2020Endocrine journalcited by 21
PMID 32269181DOI 10.1507/endocrj.ej19-0371PUB-32269181
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018
Ozono et al. 2018Endocrine journalcited by 19
PMID 29109363DOI 10.1507/endocrj.ej17-0313PUB-29109363
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated