Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry data

Investigating the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of NN-220 (Somatropin) in Short Stature Due to Noonan Syndrome

NCTNCT01927861 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other idGHLIQUID-4020Other idU1111-1131-5892Other idJapicCTI-132336

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S · Industry
Design
Randomized · Double masking
Countries
1 country

Japan

Start
19 Aug 2013
Primary completion
12 Jul 2018
Completion
12 Jul 2018
First posted
23 Aug 2013 (estimated)
Last update posted
10 Aug 2020
Conditions
Genetic Disorder · Noonan Syndrome

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
2013201420152016201720182019
  1. Ph 3

    Investigating the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of NN-220 (Somatropin) in Short Stature Due to Noonan Syndrome

    NCT01927861

    19 Aug 2013 to 12 Jul 2018

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of the trial is to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of two doses of NN-220 (somatropin) in short stature due to Noonan syndrome.

Interventions

  • somatropinDrug

Arms2

  • Experimental

    0.033 mg/kg/day

  • Experimental

    0.066 mg/kg/day

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Change in Height SDS (Japanese National Reference Data)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Height SDS was calculated using the formula: SDS = (height - mean)/SD, where height was the height variable measured, mean and SD of height by sex and age for the reference population. The scores were centered around zero. Positive SDS indicated greater height and negative SDS indicated lesser height than the mean of the reference population. The change from baseline (week 0) in the height SDS after 104 weeks of treatment was analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline height SDS as a covariate. Positive value in change from baseline indicated that SDS was better than baseline SDS. Missing values were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.

Secondary outcomes(20)
  1. Height Velocity SDS

    Time frame · Baseline to week 52

    Registry description

    Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height (week 52) and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using the formula: SDS = (height velocity - mean)/SD, where height velocity was the height velocity variable measured, mean and SD of height velocity by sex and age for the reference population. The scores were centered around zero. Positive SDS indicated greater height velocity and negative SDS indicated lesser height velocity than the mean of the reference population.

  2. Height Velocity SDS

    Time frame · Week 52 to week 104

    Registry description

    Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height (week 104) and height at week 52 divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using the formula: SDS = (height velocity - mean)/SD, where height velocity was the height velocity variable measured, mean and SD of height velocity by sex and age for the reference population. The scores were centered around zero. Positive SDS indicated greater height velocity and negative SDS indicated lesser height velocity than the mean of the reference population.

  3. Height Velocity

    Time frame · Baseline to week 52

    Registry description

    Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height (week 52) and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days.

  4. Height Velocity

    Time frame · Week 52 to week 104

    Registry description

    Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height (week 104) and height at week 52 divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days.

  5. Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame · During 104 weeks of treatment

    Registry description

    A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE; for the pivotal phase) was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the date of visit 2 (week 0; start of treatment) and no later than the date of visit 12 (104 weeks; end of pivotal phase). For withdrawal participants (if any), an adverse event with onset date no later than 7 days after the last day of NN-220 treatment was included.

  6. Change in IGF-I (Insulin-like Growth Factor-I)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in IGF-I was evaluated after 104 weeks of treatment. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  7. Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated after 104 weeks of treatment.

  8. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Erythrocytes)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - erythrocytes. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  9. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Leukocytes and Thrombocytes)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - leukocytes and thrombocytes. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  10. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Haemoglobin)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - haemoglobin. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  11. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Haematocrit)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - haematocrit. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  12. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Neutrophils)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - neutrophils. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  13. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Lymphocytes)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - lymphocytes. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  14. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Monocytes)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - monocytes. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  15. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Eosinophils)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - eosinophils. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  16. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Haematology: Basophils)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in haematological parameter - basophils. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  17. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Lipids: Total Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol and HDL Cholesterol)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in lipids: total cholesterol, LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol and HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  18. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Biochemistry: AST, ALT, r-GTP and Alkaline Phosphatase)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in biochemical parameters - aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (r-GTP) and alkaline phosphatase. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  19. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Biochemistry: Total Protein)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in biochemical parameter - total protein. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

  20. Change in Clinical Laboratory Tests (Biochemistry: Blood Urea Nitrogen, Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, Total Calcium and Phosphorus)

    Time frame · Baseline, week 104

    Registry description

    Change from baseline (within 4 weeks prior to week 0) in biochemical parameters - blood urea nitrogen, sodium, potassium, chloride, total calcium and phosphorus. Missing values were imputed using the LOCF method.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, week 104

Change in Height SDS (Japanese National Reference Data)

GroupValue (Standard deviation score)Spread
NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day0.840.09
NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day1.470.09
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline to week 52

Height Velocity SDS

GroupValue (Standard deviation score)Spread
NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day2.801.13
NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day5.011.92
Secondary outcomeMean· Week 52 to week 104

Height Velocity SDS

GroupValue (Standard deviation score)Spread
NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day0.581.59
NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day2.651.76
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline to week 52

Height Velocity

GroupValue (Centimeters per year (cm/year))Spread
NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day7.880.87
NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day9.901.49
Secondary outcomeMean· Week 52 to week 104

Height Velocity

GroupValue (cm/year)Spread
NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day6.200.95
NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day7.991.20
Secondary outcomeNumber· During 104 weeks of treatment

Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

GroupValue (Events)
NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day265
NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day306
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline, week 104

Change in IGF-I (Insulin-like Growth Factor-I)

GroupValue (Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL))Spread
NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day90.465.5
NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day159.188.0
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline, week 104

Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

GroupValue (Percentage of HbA1c)Spread
NN-220 0.033 mg/kg/Day0.140.18
NN-220 0.066 mg/kg/Day0.130.20

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
0.033 mg/kg/DayParticipants received s.c. injection of NN-220, 0.033 mg/kg/day once daily for 234 weeks (104 weeks of pivotal phase + 104 weeks of extension phase + 26 weeks extended treatment phase).0 / 259 / 2524 / 25
0.066 mg/kg/DayParticipants received s.c. injection of NN-220, 0.066 mg/kg/day once daily for 234 weeks (104 weeks of pivotal phase + 104 weeks of extension phase + 26 weeks extended treatment phase).0 / 2610 / 2626 / 26

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies3

Studies that cite this trial.

More studies

3 studies on this page

PubMed tag: none · 2026

Long-term effectiveness and safety of daily growth hormone therapy in Japanese children with Noonan syndrome: a post-marketing surveillance study.

Muroya et al. 2026Endocrine journal

PMID 41285480PMC12895119DOI 10.1507/endocrj.ej25-0116PUB-41285480

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC-ND
Read at source

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2020

Long-term efficacy and safety of two doses of Norditropin® (somatropin) in Noonan syndrome: a 4-year randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in Japanese patients.

Horikawa et al. 2020Endocrine journalcited by 21

PMID 32269181DOI 10.1507/endocrj.ej19-0371PUB-32269181

Rights unknown
Source link

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018

Efficacy and safety of two doses of Norditropin® (somatropin) in short stature due to Noonan syndrome: a 2-year randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in Japanese patients.

Ozono et al. 2018Endocrine journalcited by 19

PMID 29109363DOI 10.1507/endocrj.ej17-0313PUB-29109363

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 3 Years up to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Japanese children with Noonan syndrome clinically diagnosed in one of the following ways: 1. Clinically diagnosed by at least two medical experts using van der Burgt score list, 2. Clinically diagnosed by one medical expert using van der Burgt score list and diagnosed by result of genetic testing for Noonan syndrome, 3. Clinically diagnosed by one medical expert using van der Burgt score list and diagnosed by the same medical expert based on the results of centralised evaluation of facial change using van der Burgt score list * Height SDS (standard deviation score): -2 SDS or below (according to the Japanese reference data) * Age: boys 3 to below 11 years, girls 3 to below 10 years * Height records must be available within the period between 40 and 64 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening) * Prepubertal children (definition for girls breast and pubes of Tanner stage is I, and none of menses, and for boys testicular volume below 4 mL, and pubes and penis of Tanner stage is I) Exclusion Criteria: * Children with known or suspected hypersensitivity against human growth hormone (hGH) or related products (including any components of the trial products) * Children with diabetic type diagnosed with the Japanese Diabetes Society Classification * Children with history or presence of active malignancy * Children who have received GH (growth hormone) treatment * Children who have received systemic administration of the following medications within two years prior to Visit 1 (screening): Thyroid hormone (except replacement therapy), antithyroid hormone, androgen, oestrogen, progesterone, anabolic steroid, adrenocortical steroid treatment period for at least 13 weeks), derivative of gonadotropin releasing hormone and somatomedin C (IGF-I)

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.