Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedNot applicableResults postedRegistry data

Foley OR MisO for the Management of Induction

Short name FORMOMI

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Not applicable
Enrollment
491 participants (actual)
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania · Other
Design
Randomized · Single masking
Countries
1 country

United States

Start
May 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
First posted
6 Aug 2013 (estimated)
Last update posted
18 May 2017
Conditions
Delivery; Prolonged

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
2013201420152016
  1. N/A

    FORMOMI

    NCT01916681

    May 2013 to Jun 2015

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The percentage of women undergoing an induction of labor (IOL) is estimated to be 20% and continues to rise. Simultaneously, the cesarean delivery (CD) rate has continued to increase (2). Induction is a known risk factor for CD. Despite numerous studies evaluating time periods to define a failed IOL, there are no guidelines or accepted definitions of when to call an IOL failed given the incremental gain in vaginal delivery when IOL is prolonged. While decreasing the CD rate is an important primary focus in obstetrics, attention must also be paid to the overall length of labor given that prolonged labor is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Furthermore, a prolonged labor is associated with an increase in direct hospital costs and healthcare utilization. The use of cervical ripening agents, such as vaginal prostaglandin and mechanical dilators, has been demonstrated to reduce labor time and CD rate. In addition to specific individual agents, certain dosing and regimens for IOL and active labor have been compared to evaluate whether a particular dose or regimen can decrease the length of labor and decrease the CD rate. Most of these regimens; however, focus on individual induction agents and few have compared the efficacy of using more than one agent simultaneously. Given the associated risks of prolonged labor and limited data evaluating the use of combined cervical ripening agents, our objective is to evaluate the difference in time to delivery among women who undergo an IOL with four different methods.

Interventions

  • Cervical Foley & MisoprostolDevice
  • Misoprostol AloneDrug
  • Cervical Foley AloneDevice
  • Cervical Foley & PitocinDevice

Arms4

  • Experimental

    Cervical foley & Misoprostol

    Patients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley and misoprostol to induce their labor.

  • Experimental

    Misoprostol only

    Patients randomized to this arm will receive misoprostol only to induce their labor.

  • Experimental

    Cervical foley alone

    Patients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley to induce their labor.

  • Experimental

    Cervical foley & Pitocin

    Patients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley and pitocin to induce their labor.

Primary outcomes3

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Time to Delivery

    Time frame · Hours between start of induction to delivery

    Registry description

    Amount of hours that pass between the start of the induction to delivery.

  2. Length of Stay

    Time frame · Days between admit to hospital and discharge

    Registry description

    Total maternal length of stay as defined as days from the day the induction began to the day of discharge

  3. Severe RDS

    Time frame · enrollment through neonatal discharge

Secondary outcomes(5)
  1. Mode of Delivery

    Time frame · Start of induction to delivery

    Registry description

    Cesarean Delivery

  2. Time to Active Labor

    Time frame · Start of induction to active labor

  3. Regional Anesthesia

    Time frame · During delivery

  4. Chorioamnionitis

    Time frame · Enrollment through deischarge

  5. Maternal Morbidity

    Time frame · Enrollment through discharge

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeMedian· Hours between start of induction to delivery

Time to Delivery

GroupValue (Hours)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol13.1
Misoprostol Only17.6
Cervical Foley Alone17.7
Cervical Foley & Pitocin14.5
Primary outcomeMedian· Days between admit to hospital and discharge

Length of Stay

GroupValue (Days)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol3
Misoprostol Only3
Cervical Foley Alone3
Cervical Foley & Pitocin3
Primary outcomeNumber· enrollment through neonatal discharge

Severe RDS

GroupValue (participants)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol0
Misoprostol Only1
Cervical Foley Alone2
Cervical Foley & Pitocin0
Secondary and other outcome results(5)
Secondary outcomeNumber· Start of induction to delivery

Mode of Delivery

GroupValue (participants)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol34
Misoprostol Only29
Cervical Foley Alone35
Cervical Foley & Pitocin38
Secondary outcomeMedian· Start of induction to active labor

Time to Active Labor

GroupValue (Hours)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol7.4
Misoprostol Only13.3
Cervical Foley Alone11.0
Cervical Foley & Pitocin8.1
Secondary outcomeNumber· During delivery

Regional Anesthesia

GroupValue (participants)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol114
Misoprostol Only111
Cervical Foley Alone114
Cervical Foley & Pitocin121
Secondary outcomeNumber· Enrollment through deischarge

Chorioamnionitis

GroupValue (participants)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol15
Misoprostol Only9
Cervical Foley Alone17
Cervical Foley & Pitocin20
Secondary outcomeNumber· Enrollment through discharge

Maternal Morbidity

GroupValue (participants)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol5
Misoprostol Only8
Cervical Foley Alone13
Cervical Foley & Pitocin10

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Cervical Foley & MisoprostolPatients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley and misoprostol to induce their labor. Cervical Foley \& Misoprostol: A cervical foley combined with misoprostol will be used to induce the patient.–0 / 12330 / 123
Misoprostol OnlyPatients randomized to this arm will receive misoprostol to induce their labor. Misoprostol Alone: Misoprostol will be used alone to induce the patient–0 / 12033 / 120
Cervical Foley AlonePatients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley to induce their labor. Cervical Foley Alone: A cervical foley alone will be used to induce the patient–0 / 12346 / 123
Cervical Foley & PitocinPatients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley and pitocin to induce their labor. Cervical Foley \& Oxytocin: A cervical foley combined with oxytocin will be used to induce the patient–0 / 12546 / 125

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies2

Studies that cite this trial.

More studies

2 studies on this page

Indexing hint: Systematic review · 2023

Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

de Vaan et al. 2023The Cochrane database of systematic reviewscited by 38

PMID 36996264PMC10061553DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub4PUB-36996264

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC
Read at source

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016

Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Levine et al. 2016Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 107

PMID 27824758PMC5127406DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000001778PUB-27824758

Rights unknown
Source link

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
Female
Age
from 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * All women 18 years of age or greater * singleton gestation * vertex presentation * 37 weeks gestational age or greater * undergoing an IOL * bishop score less than or equal to 6 * cervical dilation less than or equal to 2cm Exclusion Criteria: * All women less than 18 years of age * Contraindication for vaginal delivery * Prior cesarean delivery * Multiple gestation * Intrauterine fetal demise * Fetal anomaly * HIV * Unable to consent/ non-English speaking * Non-reassuring fetal heart rate * Patients with hemolysis elevated liver enzymes and low platelets * Eclampsia * Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) 5th percentile with abnormal dopplers * IUGR less than 10th percentile with reversed end diastolic flow * Recurrent late decelerations w * Continuous contractions more than 3 times in 10 minutes at onset of IOL (given that this is a contraindication to misoprostol use at our institution) * Bishop score is greater than 6 * Cervical dilation greater than or equal to 2cm * Confirmed ruptured membranes

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.