Time to Delivery
| Group | Value (Hours) |
|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & Misoprostol | 13.1 |
| Misoprostol Only | 17.6 |
| Cervical Foley Alone | 17.7 |
| Cervical Foley & Pitocin | 14.5 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedNot applicableResults postedRegistry dataShort name FORMOMI
United States
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The percentage of women undergoing an induction of labor (IOL) is estimated to be 20% and continues to rise. Simultaneously, the cesarean delivery (CD) rate has continued to increase (2). Induction is a known risk factor for CD. Despite numerous studies evaluating time periods to define a failed IOL, there are no guidelines or accepted definitions of when to call an IOL failed given the incremental gain in vaginal delivery when IOL is prolonged. While decreasing the CD rate is an important primary focus in obstetrics, attention must also be paid to the overall length of labor given that prolonged labor is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Furthermore, a prolonged labor is associated with an increase in direct hospital costs and healthcare utilization. The use of cervical ripening agents, such as vaginal prostaglandin and mechanical dilators, has been demonstrated to reduce labor time and CD rate. In addition to specific individual agents, certain dosing and regimens for IOL and active labor have been compared to evaluate whether a particular dose or regimen can decrease the length of labor and decrease the CD rate. Most of these regimens; however, focus on individual induction agents and few have compared the efficacy of using more than one agent simultaneously. Given the associated risks of prolonged labor and limited data evaluating the use of combined cervical ripening agents, our objective is to evaluate the difference in time to delivery among women who undergo an IOL with four different methods.
Experimental
Cervical foley & Misoprostol
Patients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley and misoprostol to induce their labor.
Experimental
Misoprostol only
Patients randomized to this arm will receive misoprostol only to induce their labor.
Experimental
Cervical foley alone
Patients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley to induce their labor.
Experimental
Cervical foley & Pitocin
Patients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley and pitocin to induce their labor.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Time to Delivery
Time frame · Hours between start of induction to delivery
Amount of hours that pass between the start of the induction to delivery.
Length of Stay
Time frame · Days between admit to hospital and discharge
Total maternal length of stay as defined as days from the day the induction began to the day of discharge
Severe RDS
Time frame · enrollment through neonatal discharge
Mode of Delivery
Time frame · Start of induction to delivery
Cesarean Delivery
Time to Active Labor
Time frame · Start of induction to active labor
Regional Anesthesia
Time frame · During delivery
Chorioamnionitis
Time frame · Enrollment through deischarge
Maternal Morbidity
Time frame · Enrollment through discharge
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Hours) |
|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & Misoprostol | 13.1 |
| Misoprostol Only | 17.6 |
| Cervical Foley Alone | 17.7 |
| Cervical Foley & Pitocin | 14.5 |
| Group | Value (Days) |
|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & Misoprostol | 3 |
| Misoprostol Only | 3 |
| Cervical Foley Alone | 3 |
| Cervical Foley & Pitocin | 3 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & Misoprostol | 0 |
| Misoprostol Only | 1 |
| Cervical Foley Alone | 2 |
| Cervical Foley & Pitocin | 0 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & Misoprostol | 34 |
| Misoprostol Only | 29 |
| Cervical Foley Alone | 35 |
| Cervical Foley & Pitocin | 38 |
| Group | Value (Hours) |
|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & Misoprostol | 7.4 |
| Misoprostol Only | 13.3 |
| Cervical Foley Alone | 11.0 |
| Cervical Foley & Pitocin | 8.1 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & Misoprostol | 114 |
| Misoprostol Only | 111 |
| Cervical Foley Alone | 114 |
| Cervical Foley & Pitocin | 121 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & Misoprostol | 15 |
| Misoprostol Only | 9 |
| Cervical Foley Alone | 17 |
| Cervical Foley & Pitocin | 20 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & Misoprostol | 5 |
| Misoprostol Only | 8 |
| Cervical Foley Alone | 13 |
| Cervical Foley & Pitocin | 10 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical Foley & MisoprostolPatients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley and misoprostol to induce their labor. Cervical Foley \& Misoprostol: A cervical foley combined with misoprostol will be used to induce the patient. | – | 0 / 123 | 30 / 123 |
| Misoprostol OnlyPatients randomized to this arm will receive misoprostol to induce their labor. Misoprostol Alone: Misoprostol will be used alone to induce the patient | – | 0 / 120 | 33 / 120 |
| Cervical Foley AlonePatients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley to induce their labor. Cervical Foley Alone: A cervical foley alone will be used to induce the patient | – | 0 / 123 | 46 / 123 |
| Cervical Foley & PitocinPatients randomized to this arm will receive a cervical foley and pitocin to induce their labor. Cervical Foley \& Oxytocin: A cervical foley combined with oxytocin will be used to induce the patient | – | 0 / 125 | 46 / 125 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
2 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Systematic review · 2023
de Vaan et al. 2023The Cochrane database of systematic reviewscited by 38
PMID 36996264PMC10061553DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub4PUB-36996264
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016
Levine et al. 2016Obstetrics and gynecologycited by 107
PMID 27824758PMC5127406DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000001778PUB-27824758
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated