Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 4Results postedRegistry data

Fracture (FX) Improvement With Teriparatide: FiX-IT Study

Short name FiX-IT

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Susan L. Greenspan · Other
Design
Randomized · Open label (no masking)
Countries
1 country

United States

Start
Dec 2012
Primary completion
Sept 2016
Completion
Sept 2016
First posted
12 Oct 2012 (estimated)
Last update posted
12 Dec 2017
Conditions
Osteoporosis · Atypical Femoral Fracture

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
201220132014201520162017
  1. Ph 4

    FiX-IT

    NCT01705587

    Dec 2012 to Sept 2016

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

This open label comparison study examines the hypothesis that teriparatide given immediately following repair of an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture will enhance healing and improve bone mineral density compared to delayed treatment (after six months) with teriparatide or no treatment with teriparatide (patients who refuse therapy or for whom teriparatide is contraindicated). Patients with up-front teriparatide in addition will have greater quality of life measures and less pain compared to those with delayed or no therapy.

Interventions

  • teriparatideDrug

Arms2

  • Experimental

    Immediate teriparatide

    Open label teriparatide given immediately following surgical repair of fracture

  • Experimental

    Delayed teriparatide

    Open label teriparatide given six months following surgical repair of fracture

Primary outcomes2

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Radiologic Evidence of Bone Healing

    Time frame · 6, 12 months of treatment

    Registry description

    The radiologic indices of fracture healing included (1) cortical continuity on two of four cortices, (2) persistence of alignment, (3) decreased conspicuity of fracture line, and (4) increased callus formation. For each of these indices, healing was graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 = no change (less than 25%), 2 = minimum healing (25-50%), 3 = moderate healing (50-75%), and 4 = complete healing (greater than 75%). A composite score was calculated by summing the subscale scores for the 4 indices. Composite score scale ranged from 4 to 16 with higher scores indicating more complete healing. The primary grading was performed by a radiologist with expertise in musculoskeletal radiology, then independently repeated by a second radiologist, both of whom were blinded to the study allocation.

  2. Radiologic Evidence of Healing

    Time frame · at 10 weeks for immediate teriparatide group

    Registry description

    Number of participants with persistence of alignment as determined by a radiologist.

Secondary outcomes(4)
  1. Radiologic Healing

    Time frame · at 2, 6, 24, and 48 weeks

  2. Increased Bone Density

    Time frame · at 6 and 12 months

    Registry description

    Percent change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, distal 1/3 radius, and femoral neck

  3. Quality of Life Improvements

    Time frame · at 12 months

    Registry description

    Assessed by quality of life questionnaire (SF-36). There are 8 subscales each ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

  4. Difference in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover

    Time frame · intervals over 12-18 months depending on treatment group

    Registry description

    upfront therapy group compared to delayed therapy group and no therapy group

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeMean· 6, 12 months of treatment

Radiologic Evidence of Bone Healing

GroupValue (units on a scale)Spread
Immediate Teriparatide12.60.6
Delayed Teriparatide11.21.3
Primary outcomeCount of participants· at 10 weeks for immediate teriparatide group

Radiologic Evidence of Healing

GroupValue (Participants)
Immediate Teriparatide5
Delayed Teriparatide4
Secondary and other outcome results(4)
Secondary outcome· at 2, 6, 24, and 48 weeks

Radiologic Healing

GroupValue
Immediate Teriparatidenot posted
Delayed Teriparatidenot posted
Secondary outcomeMean· at 6 and 12 months

Increased Bone Density

GroupValue (percentage change in BMD)Spread
Immediate Teriparatide2.11.5
Delayed Teriparatide-0.61.3
Secondary outcomeMean· at 12 months

Quality of Life Improvements

GroupValue (units on a scale)Spread
Immediate Teriparatide49.36.5
Delayed Teriparatide65.020.3
Secondary outcome· intervals over 12-18 months depending on treatment group

Difference in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover

GroupValue
Immediate Teriparatidenot posted
Delayed Teriparatidenot posted

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Immediate TeriparatideOpen label teriparatide given immediately following surgical repair of fracture teriparatide: 20 microgram once-daily subcutaneous injection0 / 73 / 75 / 7
Delayed TeriparatideOpen label teriparatide given six months following surgical repair of fracture teriparatide: 20 microgram once-daily subcutaneous injection0 / 62 / 65 / 6

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies0

Studies that cite this trial.

No study cites this trial.

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
Female
Age
Not stated
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * postmenopausal women * with osteoporosis who have been on bisphosphonate therapy for one year or more (all bisphosphonates will be included such as alendronate, risdedronate, ibandronate, or zoledronic acid). * Patients will also be included if they are on glucocorticoids or other medications known to affect bone mineral metabolism as these are often found in patients with these types of fractures. * sustain an atypical subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture as defined by the the 2010 ASBMR task force. An atypical fracture must include all of the following: (1) a location in the femur distal to lesser trochanter; (2) no trauma or minimal trauma as a fall; (3) transverse or short oblique configuration; (4) noncomminuted; and (5) complete fracture extends through both cortices and may be associated with a medial spike; incomplete fractures involve only the lateral cortex. Patients who have an incomplete fracture can be included if they fall into the 2010 ASBMR task force definition. Exclusion Criteria: * men * children * those who have had radiation therapy * Paget's disease * treatment with teriparatide for two year in the past * metastatic bone disease * active cancer * hypercalcemia * hyperparathyroidism * metabolic disease other than osteoporosis

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.