Progression Free Survival (PFS)
| Group | Value (months) |
|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate | NA |
| Octreotide LAR | 8.5 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name NETTER-1
United States, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This was a multicenter, stratified, open, randomized, comparator-controlled, parallel-group phase III study comparing treatment with Lutathera plus best supportive care (30 mg Octreotide LAR) to treatment with high dose (60 mg) Octreotide LAR in participants with metastasized or locally advanced, inoperable, somatostatin receptor positive, histologically proven midgut carcinoid tumours with progression despite LAR treatment.
Experimental
177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate
* 30 mg Octreotide LAR treatment for symptom control continued until the end of study, unless the participant progressed or died. * Treatment consisted of a cumulative administered radioactivity of 29.6 Giga Becquerel (GBq) (800 mCi) 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate: Four administrations of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi). * Concomitant amino acids were given with each administration for kidney protection. * 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate was administered at 8 +/- 1-week intervals, which could be extended up to 16 weeks to accommodate resolving acute toxicity. * In case participants experienced clinical symptoms (i.e. diarrhoea and flushing) associated with their carcinoid tumours, Octreotide s.c. rescue injections were allowed.
Active comparator
Octreotide LAR
* 60 mg Octreotide LAR treatment every 4 weeks (i.m. injections) until the end of the study, unless the participant progressed or died. * In case participants experienced clinical symptoms (i.e. diarrhoea and flushing) associated with their carcinoid tumours, s.c. Octreotide rescue injections were allowed.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame · From date of randomization until date of radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first until Primary Analysis cutoff date reached on 24July2015, assessed up to approximately 34 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to documented centrally assessed disease progression, as evaluated by the Independent Review Committee (IRC), or death due to any cause. If a participant had no centrally assessed progression and had not died at the time of the primary endpoint analysis, the participant was regarded as censored in the context of a time to event analysis at the date of last evaluable tumor assessment. Disease progression was determined by objective tumor response status using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1).
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame · From date of randomization until date of progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first until Primary Analysis cutoff date reached on 24July2015, assessed up to approximately 34 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) was calculated as the proportion of patients with tumour size reduction (sum of partial responses (PR) and complete responses (CR)) according to RECIST 1.1.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame · From date of randomization until date of death from any cause up to final safety cut-off date reached on 18Jan2021, assessed up to approximately 100 months
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or the date of last contact (censored observation) prior to the date of the data cut-off, and during the entire study period (i.e. the treatment period plus follow-up).
Rate of Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame · 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months
Survival estimates were collected every 12 Months up to 60 Months to compare OS between the two treatment groups.
Time to Tumour Progression (TTP)
Time frame · From date of randomization until date of progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first until Primary Analysis cutoff date reached on 24July2015, assessed up to approximately 34 months
Time to Tumour Progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization to progression centrally assessed. It included patients who dropped out due to toxicity, but omitted patients who died without measured progression (censored to last follow-up date or death date).
Duration of Response (DoR)
Time frame · From date of randomization until date of progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first until Primary Analysis cutoff date reached on 24July2015, assessed up to approximately 34 months
The Duration of Response (DoR) was defined as the time from initially meeting the criteria for response (CR or PR) until the time of progression by RECIST 1.1.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame · From informed consent signature through study completion reached at final safety cutoff date on 18July2021, assessed up to approximately 101 Months
The distribution of adverse events was done via the analysis of frequencies for Adverse Event (AEs), Serious Adverse Event (SAEs) and Deaths, through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters.
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire
Time frame · Inclusion (Baseline) (BL), Week 72, Week 120
The Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) was developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to assess quality of life in cancer patients. It includes five function domains (physical, emotional, social, role, cognitive), eight symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea, and appetite loss), as well as global health/quality-of-life and financial impact. Subjects respond on a four-point scale from "not at all" to "very much" for most items. Raw scores are linearly transformed so each score ranged a 0-100, where higher scores indicate worse symptoms (e.g., more severe/worsened) and lower scores indicate less symptoms (e.g., less severe/improvement).
Change From Baseline in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Neuroendocrine Carcinoid Module (EORTC QLQ-GINET21)
Time frame · Inclusion (Baseline) (BL), Week 72, Week 120
The Quality of Life GI Neuroendocrine Tumor survey (QLQ GINET21) contains a total of 21 items: four single-item assessments relating to muscle and/or bone pain (MBP), body image (BI), information (INF) and sexual functioning (SX), together with 17 items organized into five proposed scales: endocrine symptoms (ED; three items), GI symptoms (GI; five items), treatment-related symptoms (TR; three items), social functioning (SF) and disease-related worries (DRW; three items). The response format of the questionnaire is a four-point Likert scale. Responses are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale using EORTC guidelines, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (months) |
|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate | NA |
| Octreotide LAR | 8.5 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of Participants) |
|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate | 14.7 |
| Octreotide LAR | 4.0 |
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate | 48.0 |
| Octreotide LAR | 36.3 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of Survival Estimates) |
|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate | 91.0 |
| Octreotide LAR | 79.7 |
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate | NA |
| Octreotide LAR | 8.7 |
| Group | Value (Months) |
|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate | NA |
| Octreotide LAR | 1.9 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate | 105 |
| Octreotide LAR | 90 |
| Group | Value (Scores on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate | 3.232 | 12.4857 |
| Octreotide LAR | -4.242 | 10.0101 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate* 30 mg Octreotide LAR treatment for symptom control continued until the end of study, unless the participant progressed or died. * Treatment consisted of a cumulative administered radioactivity of 29.6 Giga Becquerel (GBq) (800 mCi) 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate: Four administrations of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi). * Concomitant amino acids were given with each administration for kidney protection. * 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate was administered at 8 +/- 1-week intervals, which could be extended up to 16 weeks to accommodate resolving acute toxicity. * In case participants experienced clinical symptoms (i.e. diarrhoea and flushing) associated with their carcinoid tumours, Octreotide s.c. rescue injections were allowed. | 70 / 111 | 40 / 111 | 105 / 111 |
| Octreotide LAR* 60 mg Octreotide LAR treatment every 4 weeks (i.m. injections) until the end of the study, unless the participant progressed or died. * In case participants experienced clinical symptoms (i.e. diarrhoea and flushing) associated with their carcinoid tumours, s.c. Octreotide rescue injections were allowed. | 68 / 112 | 31 / 112 | 90 / 112 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated