Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Registry dataNavigation Brain Stimulation for Evaluation of the Neuroprotective Drug Efficiency in Patients After Ischemic Stroke.
Short name 3C
Overview
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Clinical Institute of the Brain, Russia · Other
- Design
- Randomized · Open label (no masking)
- Countries
1 country
Russia
- Start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011
- Completion
- Nov 2011
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Last update posted
- 23 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Conditions
- Stroke
Timeline
1 trial · 1 completed
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 3
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
Ischemic stroke (IS) causes high mortality and severe disability. To improve outcome it's very important to choose the right way of the management of the patient and an appropriate drugs. There is a large number of the so-called neuroprotective drugs, which were effective in laboratory, but didn't show positive results in clinical studies with using traditional clinical scales scores as a primary outcome measures. Specialists suggest, that the investigators could receive better results if the investigators change design of the studies, particularly if the investigators select more precise and sensitive method of assessment. Aim of this study: to determine the role of navigated brain stimulation (NBS) for evaluation of the changes in the motor centers and motor tracts after administration of different cerebroprotective drugs. (The substances won't be compared to each other).
Interventions
- citicolineDrug
- L-Alpha glycerylphosphorylcholineDrug
- cerebrolysinDrug
Arms3
Active comparator
cerebrolysin
IV
Active comparator
L-Alpha glycerylphosphorylcholine
IV
Active comparator
citicoline
IV and per os
Primary outcomes3
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
MEP(motor evoked potential) parameter: motor threshold
Time frame · 2 months
MEP(motor evoked potential) parameter: latency
Time frame · 2 months
MEP(motor evoked potential) parameter: amplitude
Time frame · 2 months
Secondary outcomes(9)
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength scores
Time frame · 2 months
Barthel index
Time frame · 2 months
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time frame · 2 months
Number of Participants with Adverse Events
Time frame · 2 months
Change from Baseline in Alpha waves percentage
Time frame · 2 months
Registry description
EEG parameter
Change from Baseline in Beta waves percentage
Time frame · 2 months
Registry description
EEG parameters
Change from Baseline in Delta waves percentage
Time frame · 2 months
Registry description
EEG parameter
Change from Baseline in Theta waves percentage
Time frame · 2 months
Registry description
EEG parameter
Presence of the abnormal epileptiform activity
Time frame · 2 months
Registry description
EEG parameters
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
Completed trials do not always post results.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- All
- Age
- from 18 Years up to 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.